[Retired] The LCD Thread

[xtknight]

Originally posted by: pm
I bought a 24" Soyo M24EI4 last night to replace a 22" NEC 1350X trinitron CRT. I love the screen for working - the image is bright, beautiful and crisp and the real estate at 1920x1200 is amazing. The colors are nice, the display angle is great and text is crisp and looks fabulous. In fact, I have only great things to say about the monitor until about 30 minutes ago.

I fired up Unreal Tournament 2004 for a bit before going to bed and it was horrible. I played it at my usual resolution - 1280x1024 but that had letterboxing, so I switched to 1280x800. The image looks fine when I'm not moving, but as soon as things get crazy (as they tend to do in UT2004), I'm not sure what happened, but it was like I couldn't see anything very well. I can't explain why exactly things looked awful, but I had a really hard time seeing stuff. It wasn't ghosting I don't think... but whatever it was, it looked terrible and I played horribly, and now I have a bit of a headache.

Eyestrain can induce nausea. When you use a lower resolution, the monitor has to interpolate and ghosting increases because more pixels are being used. This is my best guess as to what is happening to you. I'm sure Soyo cut some corners on the scaler to make this LCD affordable. But you should see to it that your graphics card is being used as a scaler, in the NVIDIA options.

1280x1024 is distorted, and quite a low res on a 1920x1200 native display. See if this happens at 1920x1200. I think your graphics card should be able to handle this, at least at low detail. Maybe this isn't preferable, but it would isolate the problem.

Is this input lag, is it the response rate (monitor is rated for 6ms), is it the 60Hz refresh? Whatever it is... I'm feeling sad because this wonderful monitor is going to have to go back to Office Max. I'll try it again tomorrow, but I'm sure it wasn't my imagination.

Backlights in LCDs flicker from around 200-600 Hz to modulate brightness. But, the display itself is hold-type meaning that the current image is static until it is updated. When it is updated, it is updated at-once, meaning all pixels are requested to transition. There is no raster pattern like on a CRT (scanning electron gun).

If you're grasping for straws you could try using a brightness or contrast of 100 to see if it helps (some LCDs use brightness to control backlight, some use contrast).

Occasionally the polarity of LCD pixels will be reversed to prevent burn-in issues but generally this causes flickering only with certain patterns.

Any guesses on what's causing my problem? I know that I have problems with flicker on CRT's less than 72Hz. I'm a little sensitive to CRT refresh. I understand that LCD refresh is totally different, but I'm still wondering if the image isn't updating fast enough.

I'd love to hear any advice - I don't want to return this screen.


Video card: EVGA 7600GT
Screen: 24" Soyo M24EI4 - lowered contrast and brightness and set color to 6500k and aside from that changed nothing on it.

It's hooked up with DVI, running normally at 1920x1200@60Hz, in game at 1280x800@60Hz. On my CRT this was a good resolution for high FPS.

See if there is anything you can describe that might be causing your nausea. Try to isolate it, see if it happens with other games.

I don't think the image not updating enough is a problem for you. Most LCDs are very easy on the eyes since they give you a continuously lit image.

 

[xtknight]

Originally posted by: KevinC
What is generally the difference between the Samsung 226BW and the 2232BW (newer)

xtknight,
did you notice in that link you posted about the 22" PVA, a little down:

I took the opportunity to ask a representative from Samsung product line about the recent panel lottery on the popular SM226BW model. The issue was certainly acknowledged and was down to unprecedented demand for the screen. However, to their knowledge, the SM2232BW only uses Samsung's own TN Film panel at present, and the aim is to provide all stocks with this panel as many users had hoped for.

so that means all of the 2232BW use the 'S' panel? wouldn't that be the better buy than the 226bw?

I am going to wait and see. According to Samsung France, 226BW was supposed to be all "S" after a certain date also but this obviously didn't materialize. The 2232GW has gotten a review of "great graphics/text" from PC World (of all the 22"s they tested) so it's a start, at least. But I don't know about the 2232BW. GW=glossy, BW=classic matte.

226BW vs 2232BW? Probably nothing except the design but the 2232BW sure does look good.

 

[xtknight]

Originally posted by: yacoub
Question: Is this monitor still this S-IPS panel? Because it's priced at around $1100 right now on Dell's site, not the $1400 listed in the topic post, so I'm wondering if it's just a sale or if they've switched to a cheaper, crappier panel as they're wont to do.

30": Dell UltraSharp 3007WFP-HC, 2560x1600 (16:10)
* Panel: WG S-IPS (LG.Philips LM300WQ1); true 8-bit, 16.7M colors

I am pretty sure it is and will always be S-IPS. I don't see the word "S-PVA" in the big 3007WFP thread at HardForum so I assume that hasn't changed.

 

[xtknight]

Originally posted by: StarTech
Any thoughts on the Viewsonic VX1940W ? Newegg has it for $240. It is a 1680x1050.

I just moved and my Dell 2005 wide ended packed in storage. I need a temporary solution until I move to a larger place. Use for web browsing and minor office work.
It may be of value to have longer page (1050) than typical 900.

Wow, 1680x1050 19". Never seen that before, actually. But I haven't seen any reviews on this monitor either.

Samsung's 931BW and 940BW are decent low-res 1440x900 19" widescreen solutions. Even a 226BW for $280 AR for 1680x1050.

Consider the HP L2045w for $230 AR: http://www.newegg.com/Product/...x?Item=N82E16824176073

Not sure what you mean by 1050 vs 900. 1440x1050 (20.1") vs 1440x900 (19"w), or 1680x1050(20.1") vs 1440x900 (19"w)? There are a couple 1440x1050 monitors too actually.

Another 19"w (1440x900): 941BW for $170 AR: http://www.newegg.com/Product/...x?Item=N82E16824001088

Not all that certain about the 941BW but it looks good. I think the L2045w is the best choice for you for now. Plus once you get your Dell it'll make dual monitor config easy (same size) if you intend on keeping the HP.

 

[StarTech]

Originally posted by: xtknight

Originally posted by: StarTech
Any thoughts on the Viewsonic VX1940W ? Newegg has it for $240. It is a 1680x1050.

I just moved and my Dell 2005 wide ended packed in storage. I need a temporary solution until I move to a larger place. Use for web browsing and minor office work.
It may be of value to have longer page (1050) than typical 900.

Wow, 1680x1050 19". Never seen that before, actually. But I haven't seen any reviews on this monitor either.

Samsung's 931BW and 940BW are decent low-res 1440x900 19" widescreen solutions. Even a 226BW for $280 AR for 1680x1050.

Consider the HP L2045w for $230 AR: http://www.newegg.com/Product/...x?Item=N82E16824176073

Not sure what you mean by 1050 vs 900. 1440x1050 (20.1") vs 1440x900 (19"w), or 1680x1050(20.1") vs 1440x900 (19"w)? There are a couple 1440x1050 monitors too actually.

Another 19"w (1440x900): 941BW for $170 AR: http://www.newegg.com/Product/...x?Item=N82E16824001088

Not all that certain about the 941BW but it looks good. I think the L2045w is the best choice for you for now. Plus once you get your Dell it'll make dual monitor config easy (same size) if you intend on keeping the HP.

The problem is actual size it takes. Due to where I have my desk in the apartment's multifunction living room I do not want to go with a big monitor. I was considering getting a regular 17" and not a 17W because the 1024 vs 900. The regular 19"s are too big for now. I do not have a use for a dual monitor. I always have my Thinkpad T60p in front of me and the second monitor for my home PC a little on the side for occasional stuff. When I get done with the T60 I close it and place on top the keyboard for the other system which is identical to the T61p (made by lenovo, with thinkpad form factor).

So bottom line is I will get a 17" standard size or may be this one. The L2045w is very nice but is 4 inches taller. Too big for the visual line on the room geometry.

My point about the 1050 vs 900 for the vertical resolution is that it allows for a bit more vertical space.

Thanks for the comments.

 

[xtknight]

Originally posted by: StarTech

Originally posted by: xtknight

Originally posted by: StarTech
Any thoughts on the Viewsonic VX1940W ? Newegg has it for $240. It is a 1680x1050.

I just moved and my Dell 2005 wide ended packed in storage. I need a temporary solution until I move to a larger place. Use for web browsing and minor office work.
It may be of value to have longer page (1050) than typical 900.

Wow, 1680x1050 19". Never seen that before, actually. But I haven't seen any reviews on this monitor either.

Samsung's 931BW and 940BW are decent low-res 1440x900 19" widescreen solutions. Even a 226BW for $280 AR for 1680x1050.

Consider the HP L2045w for $230 AR: http://www.newegg.com/Product/...x?Item=N82E16824176073

Not sure what you mean by 1050 vs 900. 1440x1050 (20.1") vs 1440x900 (19"w), or 1680x1050(20.1") vs 1440x900 (19"w)? There are a couple 1440x1050 monitors too actually.

Another 19"w (1440x900): 941BW for $170 AR: http://www.newegg.com/Product/...x?Item=N82E16824001088

Not all that certain about the 941BW but it looks good. I think the L2045w is the best choice for you for now. Plus once you get your Dell it'll make dual monitor config easy (same size) if you intend on keeping the HP.

The problem is actual size it takes. Due to where I have my desk in the apartment's multifunction living room I do not want to go with a big monitor. I was considering getting a regular 17" and not a 17W because the 1024 vs 900. The regular 19"s are too big for now. I do not have a use for a dual monitor. I always have my Thinkpad T60p in front of me and the second monitor for my home PC a little on the side for occasional stuff. When I get done with the T60 I close it and place on top the keyboard for the other system which is identical to the T61p (made by lenovo, with thinkpad form factor).

So bottom line is I will get a 17" standard size or may be this one. The L2045w is very nice but is 4 inches taller. Too big for the visual line on the room geometry.

My point about the 1050 vs 900 for the vertical resolution is that it allows for a bit more vertical space.

Thanks for the comments.

I can't find any immediate fault with the VX1940W. I say give it a try.

 

[pm]

Good advice, xknight and nataku00. You guys were right - letterboxing the game so that it runs at it's native resolution (for the screen anyway) with black boxes around it cleaned it up and it looks fine. It's still not perfect, but it's much much better. Which is good. I'll keep the screen.

 

[brencat]

Hi gang. I currently use a 9 year old Iiyama Vision Master Pro CRT which I love, but am building a new PC and thinking of moving into the 21st century by also getting a new LCD.

Since I'm 75% gaming / 25% web/office work, my choices for reasonable money seem to be:

Samsung 226BW (or new 2232BW) - TN, $280ish

Samsung 215TW - S PVA, $350 AR

Based on all the comments, the 226BW should be my pick for gaming. But the 215TW caught my attention b/c of the panel and the fact that colors will be more vibrant. I haven't been able to part with my CRT yet b/c I'm very picky about image quality, and it is very high quality monitor and great for FPS which is pretty much all I play.

What would you do in my situation? Or should I just stay with my CRT and wait for the next-gen LCDs? Thx in advance, B.

 

[Beny]

i have 206 bw !!! it's better than lg !! it's my

 

[StarTech]

Originally posted by: xtknight

Originally posted by: StarTech

Originally posted by: xtknight

Originally posted by: StarTech
Any thoughts on the Viewsonic VX1940W ? Newegg has it for $240. It is a 1680x1050.

I just moved and my Dell 2005 wide ended packed in storage. I need a temporary solution until I move to a larger place. Use for web browsing and minor office work.
It may be of value to have longer page (1050) than typical 900.

Wow, 1680x1050 19". Never seen that before, actually. But I haven't seen any reviews on this monitor either.

Samsung's 931BW and 940BW are decent low-res 1440x900 19" widescreen solutions. Even a 226BW for $280 AR for 1680x1050.

Consider the HP L2045w for $230 AR: http://www.newegg.com/Product/...x?Item=N82E16824176073

Not sure what you mean by 1050 vs 900. 1440x1050 (20.1") vs 1440x900 (19"w), or 1680x1050(20.1") vs 1440x900 (19"w)? There are a couple 1440x1050 monitors too actually.

Another 19"w (1440x900): 941BW for $170 AR: http://www.newegg.com/Product/...x?Item=N82E16824001088

Not all that certain about the 941BW but it looks good. I think the L2045w is the best choice for you for now. Plus once you get your Dell it'll make dual monitor config easy (same size) if you intend on keeping the HP.

The problem is actual size it takes. Due to where I have my desk in the apartment's multifunction living room I do not want to go with a big monitor. I was considering getting a regular 17" and not a 17W because the 1024 vs 900. The regular 19"s are too big for now. I do not have a use for a dual monitor. I always have my Thinkpad T60p in front of me and the second monitor for my home PC a little on the side for occasional stuff. When I get done with the T60 I close it and place on top the keyboard for the other system which is identical to the T61p (made by lenovo, with thinkpad form factor).

So bottom line is I will get a 17" standard size or may be this one. The L2045w is very nice but is 4 inches taller. Too big for the visual line on the room geometry.

My point about the 1050 vs 900 for the vertical resolution is that it allows for a bit more vertical space.

Thanks for the comments.

I can't find any immediate fault with the VX1940W. I say give it a try.

I ordered one this morning. Should be here Tuesday. Thanks.

 

[xtknight]

Originally posted by: brencat
Hi gang. I currently use a 9 year old Iiyama Vision Master Pro CRT which I love, but am building a new PC and thinking of moving into the 21st century by also getting a new LCD.

Since I'm 75% gaming / 25% web/office work, my choices for reasonable money seem to be:

Samsung 226BW (or new 2232BW) - TN, $280ish

Samsung 215TW - S PVA, $350 AR

Based on all the comments, the 226BW should be my pick for gaming. But the 215TW caught my attention b/c of the panel and the fact that colors will be more vibrant. I haven't been able to part with my CRT yet b/c I'm very picky about image quality, and it is very high quality monitor and great for FPS which is pretty much all I play.

What would you do in my situation? Or should I just stay with my CRT and wait for the next-gen LCDs? Thx in advance, B.

If you game a lot then I would consider the 226BW. But the 215TW does deliver a good deal of more image quality. The problem is, it has a lot of input lag. If you think you're sensitive to this then stay away. If not then the 215TW may be an easy choice for you.

Don't forget that the NEC 20WMGX2 is back to $360 AR. Best overall solution to your dilemma, IMO. Few sacrifices on the color or gaming side. Indeed your CRT was a great one, so you may come to expect quality like the S-IPS NEC (glossy/OptiClear coating).

Viewing angles will be almost as good as a CRT. The 215TW will be good too but it will have a little more gray shifting. The 226BW has the most restrictive viewing angles although when it comes to immediate viewing angle, it may not differ from the 215TW much. At wide angles, the 215TW will win easy. The 20WMGX2 has great viewing angles all-around.

When it comes to input lag, the NEC is fairly low, but it isn't a 226BW. But even most hardcore gamers won't notice anything.

If I were you I'd use the NEC on standard DV mode, ADVM off, Native color mode for best performance. When (brightness+contrast)>100 or so you may get some grayscale clipping (less colors at ends of scale) which is actually true for most LCDs so keep that in mind. Not saying those are exact numbers but you can look at a grayscale and everything to calibrate it. It is easy to tell when the end of the scale gets clipped (revert it at least 10% if this happens). Native on the NEC is roughly 6400K, very close to D65. I think it is closer to sRGB than the "sRGB" mode is.

 

[physic]

Hey all, I've been looking pretty hard for a 24'' monitor, but it seems (somewhat surprisingly) there isn't really a great one. With the ghosting problems of the Dell 2407WFP-HC and the lack of availability of the non-HC Dell 2407WFP, there doesn't seem to be a really strong contender. The Benq seems pretty hard to find, at least for a decent price, the Gateway seems to have ghosting issues as well, and Soyo QC is terrible. Sigh... any suggestions? At this rate the Dell E248WFP for $400 is starting to look good even though it's TN...

I do game, but I'm somewhat wary of TN screens. The Dell 228WFP's yellowish tinge bothers me... I know TN monitors aren't as good for color reproduction, but are all TN monitors that bad? Would the E248WFP be any better, say?

 

[brencat]

Originally posted by: xtknight
If you game a lot then I would consider the 226BW. But the 215TW does deliver a good deal of more image quality. The problem is, it has a lot of input lag. If you think you're sensitive to this then stay away. If not then the 215TW may be an easy choice for you.

Don't forget that the NEC 20WMGX2 is back to $360 AR. Best overall solution to your dilemma, IMO. Few sacrifices on the color or gaming side. Indeed your CRT was a great one, so you may come to expect quality like the S-IPS NEC (glossy/OptiClear coating).

Thx for the reply xt. Yes, I had also considered the NEC but was really hoping for slightly bigger screen real estate than 20". Still not sure what I'm going to do but appreciate your comments on the 215TW -- at least now I know that one is NOT what I'm looking for. I'm very detail oriented and notice everything...the input lag would drive me insane.

 

[imported_cam1]

Hi guys,

I am looking at this LCD for gaming.

Hanns·G HG-191RPB

http://www.newegg.com/Product/...x?Item=N82E16824254015

I need to buy one this weekend. Please let me know whether it is a good choice or not


I am also thinking of Samsung 906BW
http://www.newegg.com/Product/...x?Item=N82E16824001094

Please advise on which one is better for games.

Thanks

 

[mastertech01]

I tried searching through this thread but cant find the answer to why you removed the Planar 26 from the recommended list. You have notes that this was added some time back but I see nothing for it in the lists now.

 

[xtknight]

Originally posted by: mastertech01
I tried searching through this thread but cant find the answer to why you removed the Planar 26 from the recommended list. You have notes that this was added some time back but I see nothing for it in the lists now.

At the top I have a brief note about it:
Oct 21, 2007: Pulled PX2611W only as a precaution, due to less than favorable ExtremeTech review. May re-add later if more favorable reviews show up, although the 275T seems to be a better deal for many people at this point.

I can't recommend an LCD I'm not reasonably sure about. I have never recommended a Planar before and there has never been a pro review of the PX so I decided my initial addition of it was premature. I initially added it because of its panel but ever since, less positive comments on HardForum and from other reviews have deterred me. It does seem to have screen uniformity problems. Until there's a good, thorough pro review I won't be putting it up.

 

[xtknight]

Originally posted by: physic
Hey all, I've been looking pretty hard for a 24'' monitor, but it seems (somewhat surprisingly) there isn't really a great one. With the ghosting problems of the Dell 2407WFP-HC and the lack of availability of the non-HC Dell 2407WFP, there doesn't seem to be a really strong contender. The Benq seems pretty hard to find, at least for a decent price, the Gateway seems to have ghosting issues as well, and Soyo QC is terrible. Sigh... any suggestions? At this rate the Dell E248WFP for $400 is starting to look good even though it's TN...

Before you get the Dell, why don't you consider the Samsung 245BW@$450 AR:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/...x?Item=N82E16824001234

It is a TN but probably much better tuned than the Dell. Viewing angles should be OK for single-person use.

There's also the LP2465 (8-bit) for $530 AR: http://www.newegg.com/Product/...x?Item=N82E16824176059

You'll get slightly better angles and some interpolation options. Maybe more "stable" image/color in some cases (useful only for photo editing). Other than that, the 245BW is probably a better choice for you esp. considering price to be honest.

There is the Gateway FHD2400 too, but I haven't had time to research it.

I do game, but I'm somewhat wary of TN screens. The Dell 228WFP's yellowish tinge bothers me... I know TN monitors aren't as good for color reproduction, but are all TN monitors that bad? Would the E248WFP be any better, say?

I've never seen a review of the E248. The 245BW even though it is a TN, is a decent one with good contrast. Here's a good review of it: http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/samsung_245b.htm

It is very suitable for gaming due to low input lag. It should make most gamers happy.

 

[xtknight]

Originally posted by: cam1
Hi guys,

I am looking at this LCD for gaming.

Hanns·G HG-191RPB

http://www.newegg.com/Product/...x?Item=N82E16824254015

I need to buy one this weekend. Please let me know whether it is a good choice or not

Thanks

Try the Samsung 941BW instead. Cheaper and better performance:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/...x?Item=N82E16824001088

 

[xtknight]

Originally posted by: brencat

Originally posted by: xtknight
If you game a lot then I would consider the 226BW. But the 215TW does deliver a good deal of more image quality. The problem is, it has a lot of input lag. If you think you're sensitive to this then stay away. If not then the 215TW may be an easy choice for you.

Don't forget that the NEC 20WMGX2 is back to $360 AR. Best overall solution to your dilemma, IMO. Few sacrifices on the color or gaming side. Indeed your CRT was a great one, so you may come to expect quality like the S-IPS NEC (glossy/OptiClear coating).

Thx for the reply xt. Yes, I had also considered the NEC but was really hoping for slightly bigger screen real estate than 20". Still not sure what I'm going to do but appreciate your comments on the 215TW -- at least now I know that one is NOT what I'm looking for. I'm very detail oriented and notice everything...the input lag would drive me insane.

I'm OCD (only reason I spent $700 on an NEC originally). But I get used to things and they don't bother me. Obviously nothing can be perfect but the 20WMGX2 is close enough that it satisfies me.

Notice how much I edit my posts? Please believe me when I say it.

 

[Butterbean]

I was reading at [HArd] that the Samsung 245BW will be 399 at some places for Black Friday. Frys and Circuit City were two places I have seen listed.

 

[tyagi]

I'm a bit confused about the current Samsung range of LCDs. I'm in the market to replace my aging Iiyama 19" CRT (HM903DT), for use with my Mac Mini (60% email/web, 20% programming and text editing, 20% productivity apps) and occasionally playing a game on my PC (just MMORPGs, no FPS). I believe my Mac Mini will do 1920x1200 as its maximum resolution.

I was considering the Dell 2407-HC, but having read about the issues with this screen, I started looking at other makes, and also smaller screens. The reason for looking at smaller screens is that, if a 27" screen costs X, a 24" screen costs 0.75*X and a 22" screen costs .33*X, then why not just buy a good 22" screen now, and upgrade to a 27" (or larger screen) in a couple of years' time, possibly saving some money in the process? Given that I can buy two Samsung 226BW for the price of a 2407-HC, the numbers just don't work on the larger screens at the moment.

Anyway.. economics aside, my understanding is that Samsung also has a good policy with regard to dead or stuck pixels. I read a Support entry on their Website, which stated that within a given time period, they would replace an LCD screen if it had any dead or stuck pixels. Is this the case?

With regard to Samsung models, I'm just confused about the differences between the 226BW, the 226CW and the 2232BW. Can anyone comment?
My understanding is that the 226BW is a good, current, 22" model, but there's uncertainly about the quality of panel you'll get. The 226CW removes this uncertainty, with only Samsung panels being used, and the 2232BW is a new external styling of the 22" model, but there is still some uncertainty about which panel you'll get (reference http://forum.lesnumeriques.com...jet_2037_1.htm#t15893).

I could also be tempted towards the new Dell TN 24", or the Samsung 245B 24", but haven't seen too many reviews or comments on these yet.
Personally, I think I'll be fine with a TN panel as I'll always be sat at a desk in front of the screen.

 

[imported_cam1]

Guys,

What do you thing of 906BW for gaming?

http://www.newegg.com/Product/...x?Item=N82E16824001094


Thanks.

 

[xtknight]

Originally posted by: cam1
Guys,

What do you thing of 906BW for gaming?

http://www.newegg.com/Product/...x?Item=N82E16824001094


Thanks.

Sorry, I don't really know. If I had to guess, it would be great for gaming. Might be better than the 941BW, and more comparable to the 206BW/226BW series. I say give it a shot.

 

[xtknight]

Originally posted by: tyagi
I'm a bit confused about the current Samsung range of LCDs. I'm in the market to replace my aging Iiyama 19" CRT (HM903DT), for use with my Mac Mini (60% email/web, 20% programming and text editing, 20% productivity apps) and occasionally playing a game on my PC (just MMORPGs, no FPS). I believe my Mac Mini will do 1920x1200 as its maximum resolution.

I was considering the Dell 2407-HC, but having read about the issues with this screen, I started looking at other makes, and also smaller screens. The reason for looking at smaller screens is that, if a 27" screen costs X, a 24" screen costs 0.75*X and a 22" screen costs .33*X, then why not just buy a good 22" screen now, and upgrade to a 27" (or larger screen) in a couple of years' time, possibly saving some money in the process? Given that I can buy two Samsung 226BW for the price of a 2407-HC, the numbers just don't work on the larger screens at the moment.

I don't know. It all depends on your needs really. I think buying a 24" is a much better idea. You can't go by size alone. As a general rule, 24" monitors have a higher resolution, a smaller dot pitch, and considerably better color performance. And dealing with dual monitors can be anything from frustrating to enjoyable depending on your OS and what you do.

Anyway.. economics aside, my understanding is that Samsung also has a good policy with regard to dead or stuck pixels. I read a Support entry on their Website, which stated that within a given time period, they would replace an LCD screen if it had any dead or stuck pixels. Is this the case?

For the US? I don't think so.

This doesn't seem to indicate that: http://ars.samsung.com/custome...ROD_SUB_ID=0&PROD_ID=0

With regard to Samsung models, I'm just confused about the differences between the 226BW, the 226CW and the 2232BW. Can anyone comment?
My understanding is that the 226BW is a good, current, 22" model, but there's uncertainly about the quality of panel you'll get. The 226CW removes this uncertainty, with only Samsung panels being used, and the 2232BW is a new external styling of the 22" model, but there is still some uncertainty about which panel you'll get (reference http://forum.lesnumeriques.com...jet_2037_1.htm#t15893).

I could also be tempted towards the new Dell TN 24", or the Samsung 245B 24", but haven't seen too many reviews or comments on these yet.
Personally, I think I'll be fine with a TN panel as I'll always be sat at a desk in front of the screen.

Overdrive is a little less aggressive in the 2232BW than the 226BW:

http://translate.google.com/tr...fr%7Cen&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

Additionally, the 2232BW may be using S panels only this time around, which is a great thing. Unfortunately input lag on the 2232BW is much higher for some reason.

The 226CW is a wide gamut version of the 226BW but its performance looks lackluster at best.

I'm not recommending that at the moment. I am waiting for some reviews of the 22" LG L227WT, the wide color gamut version of the L226WT, though.

If you're looking for a 22" screen the 226BW is still your best choice for gaming due to 2232BW's input lag concerns and lack of reviews.

Other than that, give the ViewSonic VX2255wmb a good look. If you don't like the design of it, then the 226BW is fine too. ViewSonic's interface may not be as good and they have been known for some DVI issues but at least they use consistent panels in their monitors.

 

[imported_cam1]

Thanks xtKnight for your help.