[Retired] The LCD Thread

Page 252 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Gautama2

Golden Member
Jun 13, 2006
1,463
0
0
I'm at a crossroads. I'm looking to buy a new 22" monitor. Black levels, backlight bleeding, color reporoduction, and ghosting are all important issues to me. I'm willing to go up to $300, but I've found these three deals:

Dell Ultrasharp 2208WFP for $202 with free shipping, there is a $50 off Dell monitors coupon floating around, too.
http://accessories.us.dell.com...bsd&cs=04&sku=320-6107

ViewSonic VX2255wmb for $230 + $25 shipping
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000O...t75910-20&linkCode=asn

HP W2207H for $250 with free shipping
http://www.amazon.com/W2207H-2...3U6/ref=dp_ob_title_ce


I'm learning towards the HP right now, but which one is the best? And is it worth it over the cheap Dell?
 

brencat

Platinum Member
Feb 26, 2007
2,170
3
76
Originally posted by: Gautama2
I'm at a crossroads. I'm looking to buy a new 22" monitor. Black levels, backlight bleeding, color reporoduction, and ghosting are all important issues to me. I'm willing to go up to $300

I'm learning towards the HP right now, but which one is the best? And is it worth it over the cheap Dell?
I saw that hp 2207 recently for the first time and it certainly is a nice product if you like glossy screens and comes with a nice stand. However, it is outclassed in my opinion by the LG L227WTG (also a glossy screen, though not as overbearing like with the hp) for just a few dollars more:

LG L227WTG -- $280 shipped @ Frys.com

Best Buy also sold this for $249 on sale right before Xmas and it will probably go on sale again very soon if I had to bet. The LG is also the #1 pick in the OP above for Hardcore gaming. If the LG wasn't around, the hp would be my second choice however.

Edit: Almost forgot...don't know if you're considering a 22" 1080p but if you are, the BenQ E2200HD is supposed to be good. Also, Asus is making some nice stuff -- recently saw an Asus VH226H at Best Buy and it was beautiful. FYI, I'm not a Samsung fan at all -- I've seen much of their 22" and 24" TN-based line, and I'm not impressed. Ditto for Acer.
 

Gautama2

Golden Member
Jun 13, 2006
1,463
0
0
That LG looks really really nice. I'll drive around tomorrow and see if I can see it in person.
 

M0RPH

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2003
3,305
1
0
Originally posted by: brencat

I saw that hp 2207 recently for the first time and it certainly is a nice product if you like glossy screens and comes with a nice stand. However, it is outclassed in my opinion by the LG L227WTG (also a glossy screen, though not as overbearing like with the hp) for just a few dollars more:

LG L227WTG -- $280 shipped @ Frys.com

It says anti-glare screen treatment in the link you gave.
 

brencat

Platinum Member
Feb 26, 2007
2,170
3
76
Originally posted by: M0RPH
Originally posted by: brencat

I saw that hp 2207 recently for the first time and it certainly is a nice product if you like glossy screens and comes with a nice stand. However, it is outclassed in my opinion by the LG L227WTG (also a glossy screen, though not as overbearing like with the hp) for just a few dollars more:

LG L227WTG -- $280 shipped @ Frys.com

It says anti-glare screen treatment in the link you gave.

Yes. And it says that at Best Buy's website as well. Nevertheless, it is a glossy screen -- just not quite as glossy as the hp 2207h/2408h.
 

NTB

Diamond Member
Mar 26, 2001
5,179
0
0
Originally posted by: xtknight
Originally posted by: NTB
How bad is a glossy-style screen in an office environment? I've wanted a larger monitor at work for quite a while and I really like the HP w2207h that I just recently bought for home use - especially the fact that it can be rotated and used in portrait mode

And, while I'm thinking about it: my PC at work is a ~3-year old, Pentium4-based dell with built-in Intel graphics...would that be enough to drive a monitor like this?

Nathan

I'm not sure; I've never used a glossy display in an office environment. I assume the standard office is just fluorescent-lit from the ceiling. It really depends on a lot of things too like how picky you are. Personally I think I'd do fine in that environment with a glossy panel.

The HP w2408h is the obvious 24" glossy equivalent to what you have.

If your built-in Intel graphics provide a DVI port, then probably. If it only provides a VGA port, then probably not.

Boo on the graphics I checked this week, and my work PC only has VGA output. As for the monitor, I *was* looking at the 2408h until I found the 2207. The higher resolution in the 24" model would have been nice, but the price was a bit steep - I only paid ~$250 for the 22", while most places are asking $400+ for the 24".
 

Ingenuitor

Junior Member
Jul 30, 2008
21
0
0
Hello all I'm looking for three higher end monitors that are no more than 20". My mounting apparatus will only accept three 20" or two 26". http://us.st12.yimg.com/us.st....rtechcorp_2036_2988345 I think I have decided to go with three bringing the total to 60" of monitors. This will be plenty to look at I think. Plus it will be a more well balanced in function and looks as well.

What would you recommend for a fulltime graphic designer that is also a software programmer and a part time photographer? I need to buy three monitors and the ideal in my mind would be three 20" that can be rotated easily for reviewing very long coded documents of programming and high resolution portrait images in CS4, video and web pages.

All this will be mounted on a tri monitor mount and attached to an ergonomic pneumatic desk unit. I assume nor more than $1000 tops each for the panels but would like to pay less if I can. From what I read NEC are the best way to go, but is there better or similar for less money. Acer looks nice, but not 100% sure. http://www.newegg.com/Product/...x?Item=N82E16824009126

Here is a whole mess of 20's i found on New Egg http://www.newegg.com/Product/...&bop=And&Order=REVIEWS

Any recommendations are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your time.
 

aceO07

Diamond Member
Nov 6, 2000
4,491
0
76
Originally posted by: xtknight
Originally posted by: aceO07
I'm considering the HP LP2475W to replace my DELL 2001fp, which has developed major vertical strips.

What's a good price trusted reseller that I could buy it from? It's $594 on Amazon with prime shipping, but I'm in NY. So after tax, it's like $645.

Not sure if you'll be able to get it cheaper than that. There's HP.com ... http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc...70-444767-3648442.html

Not sure how that NY tax works? I recall Newegg sending people letters saying the tax was no longer charged or something like that? Maybe that was only Newegg?

The cheapest I've found is around $590 online with free shipping and no tax. Unfortunately I've never ordered from that vendor before.

Amazon and HP(I think) will charge NY tax (8.375%) on purchases. I'm leaning towards Amazon since I like their 2 day shipping and their return policy is nice. Though the final price will be around $645. I'm sure hp.com will be much more since it's $620 and add tax and shipping.
 

Diocles

Junior Member
Oct 2, 2006
18
0
0
Originally posted by: xtknight
Originally posted by: Diocles
Question #1: What do you do against 3:2 pulldown (that is, when one frame of the 24 fps movie apears for 2, and the next one for 3 refreshes on your 60Hz display, and this causes great judder) when you're watching movies on your LCD monitor?

Problem #2: Until now, I've had a 19'' which supported 75Hz natively and everything was just fine. But then I bought a HP 2475W, which can't do 75Hz but max 60Hz, which was _terrible_. Then I found out it can actually do 50Hz natively, which made things a lot better, but still not perfect as most movies are 24 fps, so about 2 frames a second are displayed 20ms longer (3 refreshes instead of 2).

That's the player's or encoder's responsibility. So maybe something like Media Player Classic Home Cinema will do it, or some of the more popular DVD software. Perhaps with some ffdshow/AviSynth stuff. I'm not too familiar with how all that stuff works together.

I thought when DVDs were encoded for home use they were set to be seen on a 60 Hz TV (NTSC) anyway so I'm not sure where this 24fps really comes in besides at the production level. Edit: or player level

And I don't believe the input lag is cumulative. If each frame was that much laggier we'd have serious issues. But, the frame actually being shown on the monitor (assuming n is the current frame) would be n-2 assuming the display had 2 frames of lag. Therefore, the speed of update isn't really different, only the offset. It's just buffering a couple for frame processing.

I've heard of 120Hz TV that should solve this problem, but I don't need a LCD TV, because I sit close to the monitor.

Question #2: But I still require something with good colors, low input lag, 72/75Hz support and >24'' size (may be either TN, IPS, VA). Does such a monitor exist?

My question, mostly for my knowledge, is what kind of media are you playing that is 24fps? I think the player or encoder should be doing this. Apparently "soft telecine" is when the player does it, and "hard telecine" is when the encoder does it.

The reason I ask is, you'll be doomed finding a monitor over 22" that does a true 75 Hz.

Sorry, I wasn't clear enough, I'll try to do my best this time. Most (99%) of movies are encoded at 24 or 25fps, or something very close to these. On the other hand, my new HP 2475W supports only 60Hz natively. So somewhere, a 3:2 pulldown must take place. If the video source is a PC, then the media player program has to do this (it eats 24fps input but it can draw only to a 60Hz output).

However, I find the effect (the judder) of the 3:2 pulldown so annoying, that I simply can't watch movies on the new display. (The old 19'' 75Hz is just fine...)

So one solution would be the change the display to a 75Hz, but, as I reckoned and you reinforced this information, 75Hz display above 22'' is nonexistent.

The only other possible solution is to fix the signal coming from the PC, and this the topic I'm looking for information about. I've tried many media players (including MPC HC), but they all produce the same artifacts. I can't believe that the other at least 2 billion PC users are not annoyed to the bones by this, so there must be some simple solution I don't know of. Or is it just me who's way to sensitive for this kind of stuff?

Edit:

Video to illustrate judder: On youtube
Original video, 24 fps @ 75Hz: Photograph (3.2sec exposure time) (Notice the 3:3:3:3:3:3:3:3:3:4 pulldown, which is quite tolerable.)
Original video, 24 fps @ 60Hz: Photograph (3.2sec exposure time) (Notice the 3:2 pulldown, which is totally unacceptable.)

Original video and photos are also available at: here


 

10e

Member
May 21, 2002
100
0
0
1:1 pixel mapping and PC aspect ratio scaling are two different things.

If I set my ATI video card to "centred timings" or my nVidia card to "do not scale" in their respective control panels, the monitor will give me 1:1 pixel mapped display. 1280x720, 1440x900, 1680x1050 etc... all show in the middle of the screen at the native resolution with black bars around them. So a 1680x1050 resolution will have 15 pixel black bars top and bottom (1080-1050/2) and 120 pixel black bars (1920-1680/2) left and right.

I think what Jarred did in his review is set the video card to "use display's built in scaling" (in nVidia) or "GPU Scaling" to OFF in ATI CCC and the monitor gave back all sorts of weird images. This I can also agree happened to me with both an ATI 4870 and nVidia 8600GTS and the E2200HD and E2400HD. I unfortunately didn't see how Jarred set up his PC video settings, so I can only theorize.

I generally advise people to let the video card do the scaling. It results in no performance penalty or increase of input lag. This is preferable. You get full resolution with the performance of lower resolutions. This should work with the G80 8800GTS you have, as I have the same card and it works very well at scaling up resolutions to full or aspect on its own.

I have tested both E2400HD and E2200HD with an HDMI cable box as well in 720p and 1080i and both showed the image properly and played sound through their tinny little speakers. This was also the case with PS3 and Xbox 360 over HDMI, and Xbox 360 over VGA at 1920x1080 resolution. The additional advantage these monitors have is the ability to enable "overscan" which will cut off 1% of the screen on all sides to eliminate any signal noise from cable/digital set top broadcasts with HDMI or disable it for 100% 1080p 1:1 pixel mapped broadcasts.

1080p support for PC monitors is not necessarily important, but most games over the past couple of years support this resolution because they will use any resolution the video card will display on a monitor/screen. I used a 1080p TV as a monitor for most of 2007 over DVI to HDMI and most recent games allowed me to select 1080p resolution including Oblivion, Bioshock, Crysis, etc... as well as lower resolutions like 1680x1050, 1440x900, or even 1776x1000.

To be honest, for PC only, I'd still recommend a 24" 1920x1200 monitor if you have the budget for it. There are still a number of them that can be used very well with consoles or cable boxes too.

Originally posted by: ibex333
Originally posted by: 10e
Originally posted by: ibex333
Hey xtknight, I'm having great difficulty finding a decent 22" gaming monitor UNDER $300 that has a 1:1 scaling option. Do you know of any? Originally I wanted to get a 16:9 HD monitor that happens to be priced below $300 AND have 1:1 scaling... That is proving impossible, so now I'm willing to settle for 16:10 as long as it meets my other requirements.

The BenQ E2200HD is a 22" with 1:1 pixel mapping and 1920x1080 resolution (16:9). It's not explicitly stated in the manual or OSD, but it does do it. It also has low input lag. DVI, HDMI, VGA.

NCIXUS also has the E2400HD for under $285.00, but shipping may put it over $300.00. it's a 1920x1080/16:9 monitor 24". This also has 1:1 pixel mapping. DVI, HDMI, VGA.

If you are having trouble finding the BenQ, and wish to have 1:1 pixel mapping on a PC, the Samsung 2343BW/BWX will do it with PC only. It has a strange 2048x1152 resolution, but it seems pretty good too. Only DVI and VGA though.

Quoted from Anandtech's review here: http://www.anandtech.com/displ...howdoc.aspx?i=3449&p=3

"The E2200HD has two aspect ratio options, Full and Aspect. "Full" is supposed to stretch whatever resolution you're running to fill the whole screen. "Aspect" should maintain the aspect ratio of whatever resolution you're using and fill as much of the screen as possible, leaving you with black bars on the top/bottom or left/right sides."

Are you sure this monitor has 1:1? From the review it doesn't look like it. I wanted to go for the 24" since the price difference is negligible, but according to the same review, the E2400HD is significantly worse than the E2200HD when it comes to non-native resolutions.

Also, I'd like to know how important is the 1080p support on PC monitors? I don't have any game consoles, but I figured this might be important for the future if they start making games specifically for these resolutions. Well, that and this monitor can double as a small TV hooked up to my cable box through HDMI. If there aren't many reasons to get a 1080p monitor as far as PC usage goes, I'm wondering if I should just get a 16:10 monitor instead...

 

10e

Member
May 21, 2002
100
0
0
Maybe this would interest you:

http://www.prad.de/en/monitore...acer-b223w-part19.html

It's the Acer B223W that apparently handles 50hz quite nicely. Unfortunately 48hz causes a non-defeatable "notification" message rendering it virtually useless. It is a TN monitor, so visually it will not be nearly as nice as the HP. You may want to read the whole review to see what they think.

You may find a solution, but it will likely not be over DVI. A user on another forum (Hardforum.com) pushed his LG L227WTG-PF monitor to 84hz over VGA, so if you are able to put up with slightly blurrier image over analog that is another option. Unfortunately the HP does not have VGA, so you will not be able to get this going on your specific screen with analog, as there is no way component will do it. You will be relegated to using VGA.

There are some 120hz monitors coming which may also do this better. Viewsonic has one that I know of that is dual-link DVI and 1680x1050 resolution, so maybe that will be an option.

Good luck.

Originally posted by: Diocles


Sorry, I wasn't clear enough, I'll try to do my best this time. Most (99%) of movies are encoded at 24 or 25fps, or something very close to these. On the other hand, my new HP 2475W supports only 60Hz natively. So somewhere, a 3:2 pulldown must take place. If the video source is a PC, then the media player program has to do this (it eats 24fps input but it can draw only to a 60Hz output).

However, I find the effect (the judder) of the 3:2 pulldown so annoying, that I simply can't watch movies on the new display. (The old 19'' 75Hz is just fine...)

So one solution would be the change the display to a 75Hz, but, as I reckoned and you reinforced this information, 75Hz display above 22'' is nonexistent.

The only other possible solution is to fix the signal coming from the PC, and this the topic I'm looking for information about. I've tried many media players (including MPC HC), but they all produce the same artifacts. I can't believe that the other at least 2 billion PC users are not annoyed to the bones by this, so there must be some simple solution I don't know of. Or is it just me who's way to sensitive for this kind of stuff?

Edit:

Video to illustrate judder: On youtube
Original video, 24 fps @ 75Hz: Photograph (3.2sec exposure time) (Notice the 3:3:3:3:3:3:3:3:3:4 pulldown, which is quite tolerable.)
Original video, 24 fps @ 60Hz: Photograph (3.2sec exposure time) (Notice the 3:2 pulldown, which is totally unacceptable.)

Original video and photos are also available at: here

 

Diocles

Junior Member
Oct 2, 2006
18
0
0
Originally posted by: 10e
Maybe this would interest you:

http://www.prad.de/en/monitore...acer-b223w-part19.html

It's the Acer B223W that apparently handles 50hz quite nicely. Unfortunately 48hz causes a non-defeatable "notification" message rendering it virtually useless. It is a TN monitor, so visually it will not be nearly as nice as the HP. You may want to read the whole review to see what they think.

You may find a solution, but it will likely not be over DVI. A user on another forum (Hardforum.com) pushed his LG L227WTG-PF monitor to 84hz over VGA, so if you are able to put up with slightly blurrier image over analog that is another option. Unfortunately the HP does not have VGA, so you will not be able to get this going on your specific screen with analog, as there is no way component will do it. You will be relegated to using VGA.

There are some 120hz monitors coming which may also do this better. Viewsonic has one that I know of that is dual-link DVI and 1680x1050 resolution, so maybe that will be an option.

Good luck.

Thanks for the reply.

Actually, the HP supports both VGA and native 50 Hz (over DVI). So I could watch 25fps movies without judder, if 25 fps movies were not less than 5% of all. 24 fps movies still suffer from something like 2:2:2:2:2:2:3 pulldown, which is nearly as bad. I'll try 48 Hz over VGA, and keep an eye out for the 120Hz displays though.
 

weh

Junior Member
May 2, 2008
2
0
0
Ingenuitor,

Check out the HP LP2065. It is a very high quality H-IPS panel (best for photo and sRGB work) and it is very reasonable in price.
 

xtknight

Elite Member
Oct 15, 2004
12,974
0
71
Originally posted by: M0RPH
Originally posted by: brencat

I saw that hp 2207 recently for the first time and it certainly is a nice product if you like glossy screens and comes with a nice stand. However, it is outclassed in my opinion by the LG L227WTG (also a glossy screen, though not as overbearing like with the hp) for just a few dollars more:

LG L227WTG -- $280 shipped @ Frys.com

It says anti-glare screen treatment in the link you gave.

Yeah, this is incorrect. It should say "anti-reflective screen treatment". I think it's Engrish.

To make matters even worse, my "L227WTG" has a sticker that just says "glare" on it.
 

xtknight

Elite Member
Oct 15, 2004
12,974
0
71
Originally posted by: Diocles
Originally posted by: xtknight
Originally posted by: Diocles
Question #1: What do you do against 3:2 pulldown (that is, when one frame of the 24 fps movie apears for 2, and the next one for 3 refreshes on your 60Hz display, and this causes great judder) when you're watching movies on your LCD monitor?

Problem #2: Until now, I've had a 19'' which supported 75Hz natively and everything was just fine. But then I bought a HP 2475W, which can't do 75Hz but max 60Hz, which was _terrible_. Then I found out it can actually do 50Hz natively, which made things a lot better, but still not perfect as most movies are 24 fps, so about 2 frames a second are displayed 20ms longer (3 refreshes instead of 2).

That's the player's or encoder's responsibility. So maybe something like Media Player Classic Home Cinema will do it, or some of the more popular DVD software. Perhaps with some ffdshow/AviSynth stuff. I'm not too familiar with how all that stuff works together.

I thought when DVDs were encoded for home use they were set to be seen on a 60 Hz TV (NTSC) anyway so I'm not sure where this 24fps really comes in besides at the production level. Edit: or player level

And I don't believe the input lag is cumulative. If each frame was that much laggier we'd have serious issues. But, the frame actually being shown on the monitor (assuming n is the current frame) would be n-2 assuming the display had 2 frames of lag. Therefore, the speed of update isn't really different, only the offset. It's just buffering a couple for frame processing.

I've heard of 120Hz TV that should solve this problem, but I don't need a LCD TV, because I sit close to the monitor.

Question #2: But I still require something with good colors, low input lag, 72/75Hz support and >24'' size (may be either TN, IPS, VA). Does such a monitor exist?

My question, mostly for my knowledge, is what kind of media are you playing that is 24fps? I think the player or encoder should be doing this. Apparently "soft telecine" is when the player does it, and "hard telecine" is when the encoder does it.

The reason I ask is, you'll be doomed finding a monitor over 22" that does a true 75 Hz.

Sorry, I wasn't clear enough, I'll try to do my best this time. Most (99%) of movies are encoded at 24 or 25fps, or something very close to these. On the other hand, my new HP 2475W supports only 60Hz natively. So somewhere, a 3:2 pulldown must take place. If the video source is a PC, then the media player program has to do this (it eats 24fps input but it can draw only to a 60Hz output).

However, I find the effect (the judder) of the 3:2 pulldown so annoying, that I simply can't watch movies on the new display. (The old 19'' 75Hz is just fine...)

So one solution would be the change the display to a 75Hz, but, as I reckoned and you reinforced this information, 75Hz display above 22'' is nonexistent.

The only other possible solution is to fix the signal coming from the PC, and this the topic I'm looking for information about. I've tried many media players (including MPC HC), but they all produce the same artifacts. I can't believe that the other at least 2 billion PC users are not annoyed to the bones by this, so there must be some simple solution I don't know of. Or is it just me who's way to sensitive for this kind of stuff?

Edit:

Video to illustrate judder: On youtube
Original video, 24 fps @ 75Hz: Photograph (3.2sec exposure time) (Notice the 3:3:3:3:3:3:3:3:3:4 pulldown, which is quite tolerable.)
Original video, 24 fps @ 60Hz: Photograph (3.2sec exposure time) (Notice the 3:2 pulldown, which is totally unacceptable.)

Original video and photos are also available at: here

Maybe this will interest you. A 480 Hz display, which as far as I can tell, operates natively at 240 Hz: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2337675,00.asp

Sadly few of these advances are coming to monitors.

I'll have to check out that judder stuff in a bit. I think I've seen the judder you're talking about in theaters.
 

ZetaEpyon

Golden Member
Jun 13, 2000
1,118
0
0
Originally posted by: paperfist
Does anyone own a Dell SP2309W 23" LCD or consider it a gaming LCD?

Thanks

This LCD also caught my eye recently. Given the cost, it's almost certainly a TN panel, which would be good for gaming, but the high resolution could require quite a bit of graphics horsepower to run at native resolution, depending on the game.

I'm definitely interested to hear if anyone else has experience with this monitor.
 

you2

Diamond Member
Apr 2, 2002
5,763
981
126
I'm rather unhappy with the HP LP2065 I received from amazon week of dec 24. The issue is backlight is excessively too bright in one corner (about 15% of the screen). For games (like witcher) which want to paint that corner black it stands out like a sore thumb. for text work, art work or games that paint the entire screen it is not noticable.

If I apply pressure to the bazel in the corner that fixes the problem but i don't see a way to apply the pressure perm. Does anyone know if i remove the four outer screws (on the back) if there are inner screws connecting the front bazel?

Anyways I've used quite a few lcds over the years and I'm not that picky. This one is exceptionally poor. I'm not sure if it is specific to this monitor or all hps.

I'm inquiring with amazon about a possible return but I'm not sure I want to go through the hassle/expense.


Originally posted by: weh
Ingenuitor,

Check out the HP LP2065. It is a very high quality H-IPS panel (best for photo and sRGB work) and it is very reasonable in price.

 

brencat

Platinum Member
Feb 26, 2007
2,170
3
76
Originally posted by: ZetaEpyon
Originally posted by: paperfist
Does anyone own a Dell SP2309W 23" LCD or consider it a gaming LCD?

Thanks

This LCD also caught my eye recently. Given the cost, it's almost certainly a TN panel, which would be good for gaming, but the high resolution could require quite a bit of graphics horsepower to run at native resolution, depending on the game.

I'm definitely interested to hear if anyone else has experience with this monitor.

There is a dedicated thread at Hardforum about this monitor if you want to check it out. Also from what I've seen, this is a glossy screen whereas the other lower resolution 1080p monitors, S2309W and S2409W are matte screens.
 

Ingenuitor

Junior Member
Jul 30, 2008
21
0
0
I will look into this, thank you for the info, seems some others are not satisfied. What about NEC or Acer even? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks
 

Ingenuitor

Junior Member
Jul 30, 2008
21
0
0
Originally posted by: weh
Ingenuitor,

Check out the HP LP2065. It is a very high quality H-IPS panel (best for photo and sRGB work) and it is very reasonable in price.

I will look into this, thank you for the info, seems some others are not satisfied. What about NEC or Acer even? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks
 

paperfist

Diamond Member
Nov 30, 2000
6,517
280
126
www.the-teh.com
Originally posted by: brencat
Originally posted by: ZetaEpyon
Originally posted by: paperfist
Does anyone own a Dell SP2309W 23" LCD or consider it a gaming LCD?

Thanks

This LCD also caught my eye recently. Given the cost, it's almost certainly a TN panel, which would be good for gaming, but the high resolution could require quite a bit of graphics horsepower to run at native resolution, depending on the game.

I'm definitely interested to hear if anyone else has experience with this monitor.

There is a dedicated thread at Hardforum about this monitor if you want to check it out. Also from what I've seen, this is a glossy screen whereas the other lower resolution 1080p monitors, S2309W and S2409W are matte screens.

Thanks for the heads up on the Hardforum tip

It seems like the S2309W is a little different (1920x1080 - 5ms - .266mm - & 1000:1 contrast ratio) then the SP2309W (2048x1152 - 2ms - .249mm - & 80,000:1 contrast ratio)

The S2409W has: 1920x1080 - 5ms - .276mm & 1000:1 contrast ratio. So spec wise it seems like the SP2309W kicks the other 2's butt...

BTW, How come it seems like everyone is down on glossy screens? I have a matte finish laptop and my friend has a glossy one and I have screen envy His looks so much more vivid and realistic then what I have.
 

brencat

Platinum Member
Feb 26, 2007
2,170
3
76
I personally like glossy screens -- still using a 10yr old CRT (not for much longer...BenQ V2400W on the way!). Then again, my monitor is in a corner office cabinet away from sunlight. Only in mid summer when the sun is at high noon does it come through the skylights in the office and annoy me.

But it also depends on HOW glossy. For example, the hp 2408h is excessively so IMO, whereas the LG L227WTG-PF is just right. I recently saw these 2 monitors in person so that is why I made this particular comparison.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |