- Jul 3, 2000
- 2,323
- 1
- 0
Originally posted by: LTC8K6
Does it really matter?
What % of the market is using SLI?
I think it might be better if ATI didn't have it at all, actually.
Originally posted by: Cooler
Yes it is a paper launch . They are not going to mass produce last years gen master cards when they have to make current gen as well.
Originally posted by: Killrose
Voodoo who? Never heard of'em. And Cross-Fire R520 is what i'm more interested in, although I'll never buy one or SLi for that matter.
Originally posted by: LTC8K6
Does it really matter?
What % of the market is using SLI?
I think it might be better if ATI didn't have it at all, actually.
Originally posted by: swatX
Originally posted by: LTC8K6
Does it really matter?
What % of the market is using SLI?
I think it might be better if ATI didn't have it at all, actually.
3- 5 %?
Originally posted by: Hacp
Seriously, Why crossfire? I bet ATI will lose alot of money because of crossfire. They should have let Nvidia keep the dual GPU market for now, and work on a better solution for the r520s. Right now, its too expensive, and too late. IMO, if they had crossfire support for ANY mobo with 2x 16 PCI-E slots, then it would have been a BIG hit.
Originally posted by: ayabe
Originally posted by: Cooler
Yes it is a paper launch . They are not going to mass produce last years gen master cards when they have to make current gen as well.
But you would think they would be mass-producing the boards and would have those ready to go.
Hopefully this isn't a sign of things to come, you know 2 days from now.