Rigging the Election - Video I: Clinton Campaign and DNC Incite Violence at Trump Rallies

[sdifox]

Droolroo seems to still think that Projekt O'Queef's video is actually true....lol! And YouTube is censoring a fucking liar! OMG!!! (note my triple exclamation marks = SERIOUS!)

Game over, man... game over...



Look for corn...

Droolroo seems to still think that Projekt O'Queef's video is actually true....lol! And YouTube is censoring a fucking liar! OMG!!! (note my triple exclamation marks = SERIOUS!)

Game over, man... game over...



Look for corn...

Acorn :awe:

 

[Victorian Gray]

What Donna can't say says it all.
Megyn Kelly Grills Donna Brazile on Democrats Inciting Violence at Trump Rally Podesta Emails
Ben King

Much the same with Hillary's dodge
Hillary Clinton Ends Press Conference After She is Asked About Project Veritas Action Videos
Project Veritas Action

Complaint Filed Against Clinton’s Campaign Following O’Keefe Videos
http://freebeacon.com/politics/complaint-filed-clintons-campaign-following-okeefe-videos/

PROJECT VERITAS EXPOSÉ COULD FORCE DONNA BRAZILE RESIGNATION
http://www.revorepublic.com/project-veritas-expose-may-lead-to-donna-brazile-resignation/

YouTube Censors Project Veritas’s Undercover Videos
https://www.chicksontheright.com/youtube-censors-project-veritass-undercover-videos/

Next drop, is tomorrow I believe.

Do parrots eat acorns?

 

[boomerang]

Troll on then.

Wait, so you guys don't think O'Keefe did something illegal? I guess I assumed based on the anger against him that that's what you guys were thinking. Interesting.

I figured the position of the leftists would be that O'Keefe was breaking the law and the position of the righties would be that Favol, Creamer, the DNC, the Hillary campaign and by association Hillary herself were breaking the law. Favol and Creamer lost their jobs over this which is curious if they did nothing wrong. I assumed that the FBI would be interested either way. But if you guys have no beef with O'Keefe that involves breaking any laws and neither does the FBI, I guess he'll be free to continue.

We live in a sometimes curious world. It's amazing what people can get away with right out in the open.

 

[LegendKiller]

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...em-playbook-rigging-polls-through-oversamples

But wait, I thought that all of these things were outputs from polling, not inputs?

 

[DrDoug]

Acorn :awe:

LOL! I should have said "Check for acorns..."! Damn.

Wait, so you guys don't think O'Keefe did something illegal?

Do you just reach into your ass, dry, and pull this stuff out or do you use a lube beforehand?

 

[sdifox]

Wait, so you guys don't think O'Keefe did something illegal? I guess I assumed based on the anger against him that that's what you guys were thinking. Interesting.

I figured the position of the leftists would be that O'Keefe was breaking the law and the position of the righties would be that Favol, Creamer, the DNC, the Hillary campaign and by association Hillary herself were breaking the law. Favol and Creamer lost their jobs over this which is curious if they did nothing wrong. I assumed that the FBI would be interested either way. But if you guys have no beef with O'Keefe that involves breaking any laws and neither does the FBI, I guess he'll be free to continue.

We live in a sometimes curious world. It's amazing what people can get away with right out in the open.

In both cases someone has to make a complaint to FBI. And if the FBI thinks there is enough ground to initiate an investigation, they open an investigation.

That is why I suggested O'Keefe should go to the feds with the raw footage if he really has something illegal on tape.

 

[jackstar7]

Wait, so you guys don't think O'Keefe did something illegal? I guess I assumed based on the anger against him that that's what you guys were thinking. Interesting.

I figured the position of the leftists would be that O'Keefe was breaking the law and the position of the righties would be that Favol, Creamer, the DNC, the Hillary campaign and by association Hillary herself were breaking the law. Favol and Creamer lost their jobs over this which is curious if they did nothing wrong. I assumed that the FBI would be interested either way. But if you guys have no beef with O'Keefe that involves breaking any laws and neither does the FBI, I guess he'll be free to continue.

We live in a sometimes curious world. It's amazing what people can get away with right out in the open.

And troll you shall.

 

[brycejones]

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...em-playbook-rigging-polls-through-oversamples

But wait, I thought that all of these things were outputs from polling, not inputs?

zerohedge says it all.

 

[zinfamous]

OrroOOrOO: this is an honest question because I really am curious.

What is it like to be a complete sucker? I mean, what is your day to day? Do you scare people on the subway, do people avoid you? Are you totally incognito, doing the Lord's work despite what everyone thinks? How does a sucker operate in a world that is so consistently against every thought they have and every move they make?

Are you just angry every waking hour of every day?

 

[agent00f]

Wait, so you guys don't think O'Keefe did something illegal? I guess I assumed based on the anger against him that that's what you guys were thinking. Interesting.

I figured the position of the leftists would be that O'Keefe was breaking the law and the position of the righties would be that Favol, Creamer, the DNC, the Hillary campaign and by association Hillary herself were breaking the law. Favol and Creamer lost their jobs over this which is curious if they did nothing wrong. I assumed that the FBI would be interested either way. But if you guys have no beef with O'Keefe that involves breaking any laws and neither does the FBI, I guess he'll be free to continue.

We live in a sometimes curious world. It's amazing what people can get away with right out in the open.

Lying to gullible dumbasses on the internet isn't illegal.

 

[DrDoug]

Here's some real news about the President who is out campaigning for Hillary that the OP can chew on...

The president said they had flirted for years with a strain of bare-knuckled partisanship that appealed to people who sought to delegitimize him by falsely asserting that he was born outside the United States and was plotting to take Americans’ guns and impose martial law.

Now, he said, they should be held to account for the consequences.

“They just stood by and said nothing, and their base actually began to believe this crazy stuff,” Mr. Obama said. “Donald Trump didn’t start this. He just did what he always does, which is slap his name on it, take credit for it and promote it.”

“Now, when suddenly it’s not working,” he added, “suddenly that’s a deal breaker. Well, what took you so long? What the heck?”

Poor OP, your manly man is losing because women hate his guts, as do a majority of men as I just heard on ABC News radio. Yup, even 53% of men don't like Trump. Look at the bright side though; now you can think of yourself as an oppressed minority...

A Trump supporter...lol!

 

[fskimospy]

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...em-playbook-rigging-polls-through-oversamples

But wait, I thought that all of these things were outputs from polling, not inputs?

Lol zerohedge. Keep unskewing those polls, it worked out fabulously in 2012 using your exact same argument!

Remember how you were puffing your chest out a month or so ago about how Clinton (the 'battleaxe') was doomed, based on these same polls? Amazing how fast you went from boasting about them to complaining that they must be biased against you. Gee, I wonder what changed.

This is a great example of emotion trumping reason. Har.

 

[Pens1566]

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...em-playbook-rigging-polls-through-oversamples

But wait, I thought that all of these things were outputs from polling, not inputs?

The beating you're going to take on 11-8 around 9pm or so will be one for the ages.

 

[Meghan54]

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...em-playbook-rigging-polls-through-oversamples

But wait, I thought that all of these things were outputs from polling, not inputs?

You do understand that that polling company was for INTERNAL Democrat polling, not for the public polling you see from the likes of ABC, Fox, Monmouth Univ., Quinnepac, NBC, CBS, Selzer, Ipsos, etc., right?

No, you probably don't understand internal polling vs. public polling. How's this...show me one national or state poll with Atlas Project as the responsible party for generating said poll.

 

[jman19]

You do understand that that polling company was for INTERNAL Democrat polling, not for the public polling you see from the likes of ABC, Fox, Monmouth Univ., Quinnepac, NBC, CBS, Selzer, Ipsos, etc., right?

No, you probably don't understand internal polling vs. public polling. How's this...show me one national or state poll with Atlas Project as the responsible party for generating said poll.

There's also a misunderstanding of what oversampling means and why it is used. Doesn't stop the low information dopes on ZH, Reddit, etc. from foaming at the mouth.

 

[Jhhnn]

There's also a misunderstanding of what oversampling means and why it is used. Doesn't stop the low information dopes on ZH, Reddit, etc. from foaming at the mouth.

Foaming at the mouth is the objective. They just find different excuses for doing so.

 

[AnonymouseUser]

Part III just dropped:

 

[MongGrel]

Part III just dropped:

If he had anything that matters it would have been released long before now, instead of the current Trump death spiral into the ground.

But running around proudly posting with your signature says a lot to begin with.

It's like you are proud of being ignorant, and do not even seem to be aware of it in your own mind.

 

[jman19]

Part III just dropped:

About as meaningful as something you'd "drop" while on the throne.

 

[AnonymouseUser]

About as meaningful as something you'd "drop" while on the throne.

That's a low blow. I thought only Repubs called Clinton a piece of shit.

 

[MongGrel]

That's a low blow. I thought only Repubs called Clinton a piece of shit.

Why are you bothering to re post the media link again ?

Trump is still in la la land.

http://www.reuters.com/video/2016/1...ger-happy?videoId=370239285&videoChannel=1003

 

[Meghan54]

That's a low blow. I thought only Repubs called Clinton a piece of shit.

Speaking of low blows, how's your day job going?

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

Part III just dropped:

dammit, that's really going to do it. she's officially done for, she doesn't stand a chance.
FINISH HER! GO FOR THE KILL!!

 

[MongGrel]

Plunk.

I'm not sure why Underoos is liking things while not posting in his thread.

 

[sdifox]

Plunk.

I'm not sure why Underoos is liking things while not posting in his thread.

Oh god that was precious.