Whew, this joke again!That you actually believe she is in immediate control of all those things you listed goes in direct conflict with your username.
Whew, this joke again!
She chose to have the server in opposition to council. She took credit for her great works in the middle east.
Either she did it and she can take credit, or she didn't do it and it isn't a qualification. Is Kerry equally powerless? Is it time to eliminate the office of the secretary of state?
Hey, it's a good joke and it works.
As to the rest ... I'm sure the failed states are entirely her fault, as are the outside donations she deposited the check for herself on her lunch break. You have the same problem Cheeto Mussolini does in that you think a person in a position of power is ALL POWERFUL and can do whatever they want with no checks or input from anyone else. Once you realize that's not the case, likely once you take Civics in 8th grade, you'll see (hopefully) how monumentally asinine this train of thought actually is.
It doesn't really.
Having not read through this entire exchange, I would agree that Brazile abused her position within CNN's organization by forwarding a tip to Hillary Clinton, though any reasonable unbiased person could not possibly think that such an over-prepared candidate like Hillary would be unprepared for such a benign question, and thus find this tip useful. What I think is really going in here is that you are grasping at straws with this email dump because the bombshells you and so many others had desperately wanted just simply don't exist, and thus people are trying to elevate seemingly minor, albeit interesting revelations within these emails to the level of a major scandal, and they simply are not. In a normal election year with 2 highly disciplined candidates, the media might have jumped on this simply because there is little else to talk about. In the year of Trump and his daily baiting of the media with his ridiculous candidacy, this email shit just isn't going to break through. Just face the reality. Republicans nominated a turd, which is allowing a highly qualified but flawed Democratic candidate to skate into the white house. Saying they are equally bad just because neither is perfect is engaging in blatant intellectual dishonesty, and thankfully most of the traditional media are doing their jobs and wont go along with this false equivalency.
Yet no one has made a critical claim that withstands scrutiny. Just the insult over and over. It loses is impact after the unteenth time it is alleged in absence of any evidence.Actually, it really does - your post history proves it.
It doesn't really.
Trump isn't my problem, seriously, I don't know how many times I have to explain it.
Still, id like to address your commentary. If the president doesn't have all of these powers then why are we in a perpetual state of emergency, why do we need the extension of the AUMF, and why are all the Democrats spouting nonsense about Trump as 'a fascist overlord?' Why did Bush hate black people when he didn't use mind powers to teleport trailers after Katrina? Following on this logic, the Democrats expected Trump to give back racists money (they did the same thing with Ron Paul, who was left of Obama on gay marriage in 2008) but Hillary isn't expected to return money from a country that throws gays off of buildings and makes women ride in the back? If she can send a few emails and get a public employee to setup a server she was specifically told not to do, then certainly she can have other (actually important to the operation of the us government) things done in the same manner.
It is quite obvious that your world view is shaped by alternative media outlets, so it's difficult to know where to begin.
a.) We are not in a perpetual state of crisis. That is just what the right spews non-stop to keep their anxiety riven base all riled up.
b) Bush's response to Katrina is universally regarded as terrible
c) Equating Trump taking money from racists to support his campaign with money accepted by world renown Charity bearing the Clinton's name that does a tremendous job is flatly dishonest. Like many on the right, I assume you operate from this base assumption that the Clinton foundation is corrupt and exists solely for the Clinton's personal benefit rather than it's well known charity mission, disregarding any burden of proof to support your assumption. So lets assume Hillary faciliated a transfer of money from a ruthless dictator and channeled it into Aids prevention in Africa....whats the problem with this again? Dont feed me any pay to play bullshit without proof of a tangible exchange that would constitute an abuse of her position as SOS.
d) I have never seen a story that suggests a public employee set up her private email server, which she had used prior to her nomination as SOS when she was a US senator. Do you have any proof to back up this claim, or is this just more unsubstantiated bullshit you gleaned from your FUD media sources? The worst Clinton can be indicted of regarding this email issue is negligence born out of a sense of entitlement, which is not all that surprising given it's a former first lady who is kind of a big deal. Knock against her? Sure. Disqualifying?...Hardly.
Part 4 is up
Rigging the Election - Video IV: $20K Wire Transfer From Belize Returned
MY GOD MAN!! HOW ARE WE NOT SEEING THIS ON EVERY NEWS BROADCAST, AND ON EVERY NEWS SITE?!? YOU'VE BLOWN IT WIDE OPEN!!Part 4 is up
Rigging the Election - Video IV: $20K Wire Transfer From Belize Returned
a) Is Washington Post alternative media?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...s-in-a-state-of-emergency-30-of-them-in-fact/
b) boo hoo, was he or was he not accused of hating black people because he did not use magical powers to make trailers appear?
c) no problem at all, Trump hasn't passed any legislation supporting racists so I'm sure that apologies for leftist nonsense will be forthcoming. Still, Hillary probably shouldn't have approved sending them all those weapons.
d) have you been paying any attention at all?
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...enter-of-hillary-clinton-s-email-scandal.html
"But Pagliano also had an unusual employment arrangement. He was pulling down a six-figure salary at the State Department, which put him at the high-end of the pay scale for what appeared to be an ordinary tech support job. But Paliano was also being paid on the side in cash by the Clinton family, something his immediate supervisors didn’t know. In fact, they were never clear on precisely what his job was and didn’t know that during office hours, Pagliano was working for Clinton personally to maintain her private email system."
It doesn't really.
Trump isn't my problem, seriously, I don't know how many times I have to explain it.
Still, id like to address your commentary. If the president doesn't have all of these powers then why are we in a perpetual state of emergency, why do we need the extension of the AUMF, and why are all the Democrats spouting nonsense about Trump as 'a fascist overlord?' Why did Bush hate black people when he didn't use mind powers to teleport trailers after Katrina? Following on this logic, the Democrats expected Trump to give back racists money (they did the same thing with Ron Paul, who was left of Obama on gay marriage in 2008) but Hillary isn't expected to return money from a country that throws gays off of buildings and makes women ride in the back? If she can send a few emails and get a public employee to setup a server she was specifically told not to do, then certainly she can have other (actually important to the operation of the us government) things done in the same manner.
Pagliano? A story from July? He did work with Clinton's server & he did receive immunity, likely over tax issues. The rest is hearsay.
Your whole schtick plays like an episode of Seinfeld where somebody gets twisted over the Soup Nazi-
No indictment for you! And nothing left to do except whine piteously.
I don't think of myself as part of some club that governs my belief system and obligates me to rush to the internet in defense of idiot politicians doing idiot things. Its liberating, thinking for yourself and expending the effort to come to your own conclusions without them being prepackaged for you by your betters.Centrism implies acting like a republican at times, too. Just a heads up having a lot of trouble figuring that out is why people think of you the way they do.
the election has been rigged for decades, only 2 choices, both almost always suck, illusion of choice, blah blah blah
I don't think of myself as part of some club that governs my belief system and obligates me to rush to the internet in defense of idiot politicians doing idiot things. Its liberating, thinking for yourself and expending the effort to come to your own conclusions without them being prepackaged for you by your betters.
What are three things you love about Trump? What are three things that you despise about Trump? Just curious.
The claim was that Pagliano was the public employee that setup the server. Was that claim borne out in the quote, yes or no?
It doesn't really.
Trump isn't my problem, seriously, I don't know how many times I have to explain it.
Still, id like to address your commentary. If the president doesn't have all of these powers then why are we in a perpetual state of emergency, why do we need the extension of the AUMF, and why are all the Democrats spouting nonsense about Trump as 'a fascist overlord?' Why did Bush hate black people when he didn't use mind powers to teleport trailers after Katrina? Following on this logic, the Democrats expected Trump to give back racists money (they did the same thing with Ron Paul, who was left of Obama on gay marriage in 2008) but Hillary isn't expected to return money from a country that throws gays off of buildings and makes women ride in the back? If she can send a few emails and get a public employee to setup a server she was specifically told not to do, then certainly she can have other (actually important to the operation of the us government) things done in the same manner.
I don't think of myself as part of some club that governs my belief system and obligates me to rush to the internet in defense of idiot politicians doing idiot things. Its liberating, thinking for yourself and expending the effort to come to your own conclusions without them being prepackaged for you by your betters.
Three things I love:
1) He's not a career politician
2) He's not afraid to call it like he sees it
3) He can't be bought by special interest groups or people like Soros
Three things I despise:
1) He occasionally says stupid things (see 2 above)
2) He did some skits with WWE back in the day
3) His religious overtones
1) He's a career con man
2) He tells it the way he knows you want to hear it
3) He's already owned by his creditors