No one is ever found innocent in court, it's guilty or not guilty.
The reason the two dead fellows can't be called victims is that assumes guilt on the part of KR. We don't know if they're victims, they could be perpetrators.
No one is ever found innocent in court, it's guilty or not guilty.Like someone else predicted, I won't be surprised if he will be found "innocent" due to the bias of the Judge from the get go. Why tell the prosecution that the two people he "murdered" cannot be referred to as "victims"? Hopefully the jury will do so otherwise.
The Kyle Rittenhouse Judge Is the Actual Worst
“I think Kyle Rittenhouse is going to get off. They gave the case to the worst judge in town.”www.vanityfair.comKyle Rittenhouse looks like he’s headed for an acquittal, legal analyst says
On Monday, the prosecution’s case against an Illinois teen, 18-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse, collapsed with a confounding unforced error.nypost.com
I asked a simple question. What am I supposed to see? I know you ammosexuals assume every armed white man shooting an unarmed person is a hero but by law it actually depends on the circumstances of the shooting.thank god there are people who understand that an aggressor does not need a weapon to defend himself. why is that so fucking hard for you people to understand that? you guys are very butt hurt that the trial is not going in your way so you won't get your virtual blood on your tongue. swampy ass forum.
Drone video shown at Kyle Rittenhouse trial shows teen fatally shooting man at close range during Kenosha protests - CBS NewsThe footage showed Rosenbaum following Rittenhouse before Rittenhouse suddenly spins around and fires his rifle at him. Rosenbaum falls, and Rittenhouse runs around a car.
The footage showed Rosenbaum following Rittenhouse before Rittenhouse suddenly spins around and fires his rifle at him. Rosenbaum falls, and Rittenhouse runs around a car.
thanks for the clarification.No one is ever found innocent in court, it's guilty or not guilty.
The reason the two dead fellows can't be called victims is that assumes guilt on the part of KR. We don't know if they're victims, they could be perpetrators.
And neither conclusively means the accused did or did not do what they were charged with.No one is ever found innocent in court, it's guilty or not guilty.
KR was the aggressor the minute he aimed the gun at Rosenbaum seconds before KR ran to the spot where he shot Rosenbaum.I asked a simple question. What am I supposed to see? I know you ammosexuals assume every armed white man shooting an unarmed person is a hero but by law it actually depends on the circumstances of the shooting.
For example most self-defense laws need a reasonable fear of imminent bodily harm or death. Now to an ammosexual this may seem like a low bar since you guys are deathly afraid of immigrants, melanin, women, liberals, vaccines, books, civil rights, voting rights, and Big Bird. None of those however are reasonable fears under the law.
He also can’t have been the aggressor before shooting.
So help me out and put what happened in context. What am I supposed to see in that video? What happened before the drone video?
Of course not. Isn't the rule "beyond a reasonable doubt"?And neither conclusively means the accused did or did not do what they were charged with.
That often happens when there's incredibly obvious video evidence, well enough for any normal person to look at it and say 'yep, that person did the wrong thing.In the case of KR, the media had convicted him the day after the event.
Nope, I hate him because he placed himself in a situation where he knew he'd have an opportunity to shoot someone in 'self defense', then fucks like you waddle out to say that it was self defense.You hate KR for political reasons and would happily see him spend the rest of his life behind bars.
Yep, the ongoing abuse of self-defense by the right-wing is the heart of the issue here. The law in all states is explicit in that a person cannot be an aggressor to an altercation, and use the claim of self-defense to evade prosecution for their actions. And yet over and over and over again that is exactly what conservatives are doing to justify their violence, even in cases that are just fucking egregious.That often happens when there's incredibly obvious video evidence, well enough for any normal person to look at it and say 'yep, that person did the wrong thing.
Nope, I hate him because he placed himself in a situation where he knew he'd have an opportunity to shoot someone in 'self defense', then fucks like you waddle out to say that it was self defense.
If this was a black guy that went to a Trump rally with a 'Fuck Trump' shirt and an AR-15, then shot a few folk, you'd be calling him guilty, because he would be.
Perfect example right here. I never sad he was innocent, though it may not matter due to the inept prosecution. You hate what you think he stands for, and you want him punished for that. What you don't understand is that thinking is why we have jury's and trials. You want to convict through hate, I find the other method preferable.That often happens when there's incredibly obvious video evidence, well enough for any normal person to look at it and say 'yep, that person did the wrong thing.
Nope, I hate him because he placed himself in a situation where he knew he'd have an opportunity to shoot someone in 'self defense', then fucks like you waddle out to say that it was self defense.
If this was a black guy that went to a Trump rally with a 'Fuck Trump' shirt and an AR-15, then shot a few folk, you'd be calling him guilty, because he would be.
Why do you say the inept prosecution? The judge has done more to the contributions of ineptness.Perfect example right here. I never sad he was innocent, though it may not matter due to the inept prosecution. You hate what you think he stands for, and you want him punished for that. What you don't understand is that thinking is why we have jury's and trials. You want to convict through hate, I find the other method preferable.
Your words, not mine. He did an action that deserves punishment, that's all.You hate what you think he stands for, and you want him punished for that.
Perfect example right here. I never sad he was innocent, though it may not matter due to the inept prosecution. You hate what you think he stands for, and you want him punished for that. What you don't understand is that thinking is why we have jury's and trials. You want to convict through hate, I find the other method preferable.
This judge is giving the performance of a lifetime.
Yet you spew the exact same crap here.Even i don't punish myself with that crap.
Yet you spew the exact same crap here.
And don't forget the ubiquitous "who, me?!?' defense. That shit never gets oldClassic delusional symptoms. 'Oh I'm not like them' - when you are exactly like them and worse.
Typical right wing POS pretending to themselves they aren't a POS because they like how that makes them feel better.
It’s sad. Here we have again a poor kid consumed and obsessed with guns and thus obsessed with the biggest nastiest guns made. Guns that at one time were only allowed in the armed forces I.e. the military. Naturally a 17 year old kid is going to want to own one of those nasty big guns for themself, and so much so that he asked an adult to help buy this gun that he himself knew he could not buy nor own on his own.
Thanks NRA. Good job in making America a country of gun lovers. But not just gun lovers, a country of the gun obsessed.
The differences in defendants outside and inside court always makes me laugh.
That's right dipshit, court those Proud Boys, throw that OK symbol. Message received loud and clear.
What am I supposed to see here? I see a man with no obvious weapons in his hand running at KR who turns and shoots him several times at close range with his rifle.