Let me help you. I said is there any other evidence... So, given the only evidence that was introduced in court was by Kyle and his friend and given his propensity for both lying and being comfortable breaking laws (driving without a license, straw purchase, that he was a MEDIC). And also not finding his story credible that the gun was stored in a safe in his friend's father's house but somehow the day he needed it, he walked into the house and his AR15 was not in a safe. I do not find any of his testimony or that of his friend credible. And so absent any other corroborating evidence, I do no believe it is has been established or is a A FACT that he did not cross state lines with a rifle. Now, it is also NOT a FACT that he did cross state lines with a gun. But I still believe the latter is more likely given his propensity for not giving a shit and LYING.