I got just the one for you too .. No spoilers and no peaking though...You Germans sure like the idea of tattooing people.
It's not bravery to intentionally place oneself in a situation where one will have to kill in "self-defense," it's just a sick way to get away with killing people.
There is no evidence those individuals were looting our rioting. Most people were there just observing or generally protesting.Are we supposed to ignore the fact that the existence of "a situation where one will have to kill in "self-defense" is the root of the problem?
Follow a couple of simple rules and you can avoid being killed by someone who is acting in self defense. First, don't be out rioting, looting or otherwise causing damage to persons or property. Second, should you choose to engage in these acts, don't be stupid enough to attack an armed individual who is clearly attempting to defend against such actions.
Or if you are black don't be out in a neighborhood where white people think you don't belong.Are we supposed to ignore the fact that the existence of "a situation where one will have to kill in "self-defense" is the root of the problem?
Follow a couple of simple rules and you can avoid being killed by someone who is acting in self defense. First, don't be out rioting, looting or otherwise causing damage to persons or property. Second, should you choose to engage in these acts, don't be stupid enough to attack an armed individual who is clearly attempting to defend against such actions.
When he shot the first guy, he didn't try to give first aid.
He's a piece of shit, just like anyone that defends him.
Are we supposed to ignore the fact that the existence of "a situation where one will have to kill in "self-defense" is the root of the problem?
Follow a couple of simple rules and you can avoid being killed by someone who is acting in self defense. First, don't be out rioting, looting or otherwise causing damage to persons or property. Second, should you choose to engage in these acts, don't be stupid enough to attack an armed individual who is clearly attempting to defend against such actions.
If there were a bunch of lynch mobs out that night looking to attack people why were the only people shot and killed in proximity to Rittenhouse?Given the lynch mob that chased Rittenhouse down, caught him, tried to pummel, CLUB, and SHOOT him, who the !@#$ is going to stick around waiting to be murdered?
One man already attacked him. There is gunfire in the air. And other people are inciting violence against Rittenhouse, yelling to "brain" him. Which they then proceeded to actually try and do, btw. In case the strong video evidence of them trying to follow up on those threats somehow escaped your notice.
Shows what you think of our right to Life, Liberty, and Pursuit of Happiness. All because you are a sick !@#$ who only cares about his own, and doesn't give a damn that a lynch mob tried to kill a teen on the streets. Your complaint is that they failed to kill him. To hell with you.
Given the lynch mob that chased Rittenhouse down, caught him, tried to pummel, CLUB, and SHOOT him, who the !@#$ is going to stick around waiting to be murdered?
One man already attacked him. There is gunfire in the air. And other people are inciting violence against Rittenhouse, yelling to "brain" him. Which they then proceeded to actually try and do, btw. In case the strong video evidence of them trying to follow up on those threats somehow escaped your notice.
Shows what you think of our right to Life, Liberty, and Pursuit of Happiness. All because you are a sick !@#$ who only cares about his own, and doesn't give a damn that a lynch mob tried to kill a teen on the streets. Your complaint is that they failed to kill him. To hell with you.
Cause he was the one they went after.If there were a bunch of lynch mobs out that night looking to attack people why were the only people shot and killed in proximity to Rittenhouse?
You are a jackass. Rittenhouse clearly wanted to shoot people and become famous. He injected himself into the situation pretending to be a medic and the magically the only people shot that day were by him. He is a wack job. If you want to defend cosplaying vigilante nuts creating havoc, you are a problem.Given the lynch mob that chased Rittenhouse down, caught him, tried to pummel, CLUB, and SHOOT him, who the !@#$ is going to stick around waiting to be murdered?
One man already attacked him. There is gunfire in the air. And other people are inciting violence against Rittenhouse, yelling to "brain" him. Which they then proceeded to actually try and do, btw. In case the strong video evidence of them trying to follow up on those threats somehow escaped your notice.
Shows what you think of our right to Life, Liberty, and Pursuit of Happiness. All because you are a sick !@#$ who only cares about his own, and doesn't give a damn that a lynch mob tried to kill a teen on the streets. Your complaint is that they failed to kill him. To hell with you.
There is no evidence those individuals were looting our rioting. Most people were there just observing or generally protesting.
Rittenhouse went looking to kill people and become famous. He claimed he was a medic. When he shot the first guy, he didn't try to give first aid. When someone told him to call 911 while they tried to compress the wound, he called a friend to show off that he shot someone instead.
He's a piece of shit, just like anyone that defends him.
The simple rule should be sociopaths should not be allowed to walk around with guns cosplaying cops and vigilantes.
How did race play into this or is that all you have left?Or if you are black don't be out in a neighborhood where white people think you don't belong.
We don't know everything that happened that night. Two primary witnesses are dead. But we do know a kid that had praised himself shooting people on social media injected himself into a situation under false pretenses, and then did exactly that. You support blood hungry vigilante cosplaying wanna bes doing this. You are a garbage person deep down.The persons who were there "just observing or generally protesting" and did not attack an armed individual went home that night.
Lol!!
Clearly identifying a good guy with a gun is pretty fucking easy but identifying a good guy without a gun, well that’s just nonsense!
Do you hear how fucking dumb you guys are? Seriously, do you hear it?
I’ll break it down for you just in case you aren’t as stupid as you come across in your post.
For one, identifying whether or not a person is doing good or bad is pretty fucking hard when both parties are in a situation where things are getting out of hand. Hell, it’s pretty fucking difficult to identify when both parties think they are the good guy.
But you know what about your post was the dumbest fucking thing you said? It’s that you think someone who clearly isn’t law enforcement has any right to threaten, let alone kill, another person because they think someone is in the wrong.
You idiots support vigilantism like marvel comics is real life and everyone is either a hero or a bad guy and things are black and white with nothing in between. News flash, it’s not black and white and while you excuse someone who won a competition because they had a gun you knowingly or unknowingly advocate for a society that is being anti democratic and certainly not in adherence with the constitution.
They refuse to accept the evidence of the kid fantasizing about doing this, then going and doing it, and then calling a friend to tell them his great story. The one and only reason people got shot that night is because Kyle Rittenhouse wanted to go shoot people.If there were a bunch of lynch mobs out that night looking to attack people why were the only people shot and killed in proximity to Rittenhouse?
And the other 'they' believe it is their God given right to kill protesters. Rittenhouse bragged of wanting to do what he did before he did it. Hardly a heroic act of self-defense.They consider attacking other people their god given right to "protest".
"How dare Americans be armed and able to protect themselves from us?!"
I am going to reply to this, as I was the one that liked your post.Or if you are black don't be out in a neighborhood where white people think you don't belong.
The law isn't the problem. And no one wants to take away anyone's right to protect themselves. The issue is that some people seem to believe that their right to self-defense means being able to start the fight they end up having to protect themselves in.If someone is really that irate that the law was properly followed ... get the law changed to where you cannot protect yourself, or whatever you think needs done.
Let me help you. My original post was in response to someone who suggested an interstate weapons charge. There is no evidence (zip, zilch, nada) that the gun left Wisconsin. There is a statement from Kyle and corroborated by his friend that it didn't. Your belief that they're not credible has no bearing on the FACT that there's no evidence proving otherwise.
My understanding was the gun remained in Wisconsin. He didn't cross state lines with it.
It's legal in about 28 States. Some restrictions may apply.
Open Carry Laws by State
www.concealedcarry.com
Are we supposed to ignore the fact that the existence of "a situation where one will have to kill in "self-defense" is the root of the problem?
Follow a couple of simple rules and you can avoid being killed by someone who is acting in self defense. First, don't be out rioting, looting or otherwise causing damage to persons or property. Second, should you choose to engage in these acts, don't be stupid enough to attack an armed individual who is clearly attempting to defend against such actions.
What happened was that one side celebrated being able to get away with killing members of the other side by proxy. So expect more people to go out looking and hoping for more ways to kill in 'self-defense.' It is apparently what you want.