You are just sad and crying angry tears because you didn't get your way and get to lynch the guy. The law was carried out as written. You are the fascist that wanted to lynch an innocent man, but a jury of his peers prevailed and found him NOT GUILTY on ALL counts.You would have done excellently in the south during lynchings. Or in kangaroo courts of fascists. If the GQP made Trump emperor and the SC said it's ok, you'd be like, well, they said it's ok k.
Terrible people the lot of you.
You are such a fucking idiot.Didn't seem like a veiled threat. I took it as those two seem to be new best friends since the judge looked out for his well being rather then do his job in an unbiased manner.
Besides, you have no problem with veiled threats. I say that based on your silence concerning Paul Gosar.
Here you go sunnybunny, get a rifle just like your heroes rifle.Blue states should immediately pass laws to shore up the types of issues that let this scum bag walk.
Now, with that said, the guy that kicked off the entire shit show was KR.. He went there illegally armed to intimidate and start trouble.
Kyle's social media posts were not allowed to be mentioned. Of his post about wanting to have a gun when there were BLM protestors around, implying he wanted to shoot some. Or about becoming famous. Or his history of him beating up some girl. The trial was rigged and indifferent moderates like greenman don't care because they are just dishones and they enjoy that.Go read the article in post number #385 about the verdict. Now, with that said, the guy that kicked off the entire shit show was KR.. He went there illegally armed to intimidate and start trouble. The Evidence that was not allowed to be used in court by the bias judge, gives very clear picture of his intentions. He found the trouble he went there to cause, and shot an unarmed man.. and then shot the next two people who tried to stop him from running away from the scene... All 3 shootings happened in 1 minute 20 seconds.. The little princess got away with murder because of the way the laws in that state are written, he had a judge who catered to his acquittal, and because he was a white boy. How many other people walk away with zero convictions of any charges when shooting an unarmed person short of a police officer? Specially when they where illegally caring? Very few if any, and I am pretty certain, if any have, where all white.. There isn't a colored person in this country that would have gotten away scot free like this little murdering princess did. Hell, if a colored person did what KR did, they would have been shot on the same street by the cops who let KR just walk on by.
I won't be surprised if the little murdering princess gives himself away that it wasn't self defense during one of the many interviews and right wing tv spots he will be having. The problem is, unless it is live, the right wing media will edit the truth out so they can keep him as their poster child. When that happens, I hope to hell the prosecutor goes after him for any charges that won't be considered double jeopardy, starting with perjury.
You are a nasty creature. Similar to so many of those that cheered on the most horrific political and legal movements in history. Everyone here knows it. You lot are twisted. Just like your whole Trumpie movement, started by a horrific man with zero principles, just like you. It's disgusting.You are just sad and crying angry tears because you didn't get your way and get to lynch the guy. The law was carried out as written. You are the fascist that wanted to lynch an innocent man, but a jury of his peers prevailed and found him NOT GUILTY on ALL counts.
You like veiled threats as long as they are against people that look like me. That's why you are a dishonest cvnt.You are such a fucking idiot.
"I say that based on your silence concerning Paul Gosar."
People that look stupid? I've never seen you and have no idea what you look like.You like veiled threats as long as they are against people that look like me. That's why you are a dishonest cvnt.
While I agree with it in principle, seems like a nightmare to enforce, trying to decide not only whether one was threatened, but if he had a viable retreat.Yes, I think blue states should mimic MA's laws, Duty to Retreat laws specifically.
While I agree with it in principle, seems like a nightmare to enforce, trying to decide not only whether one was threatened, but if he had a viable retreat.
Of course, we could just ban people from walking around open carrying AR15s, but that would be too simple and effective.
The police and national guard were tasked with controlling the situation, you know, like people with actual training and equipment to do so. Not a 17 year old kid who wants to become a macho vigalante. Of course, now we see what a crybaby he really is in court. Certainly not someone emotionally mature enough to walk into a dangerous situation with a loaded AR15. And of course we have to have the usual right wing victim shaming. They still are human beings, with just the same right to not be gunned down as anyone else.Guess no blame at all on the rioters who were the ones that really started this 'shitshow'....if they showed up to just peacefully protest and not loot or riot, none of this would have ever happened...but we know that was never really a possibility. It also funny that there is no mention that they were ones out there to start trouble and destroy property even before KR showed up.
And I guess there is no blame for the individuals who actually instigated the attacks on KR...on their own free will, they tried to kick him, strike him in the head with a skate board and point a gun at him....how different would the night have been if those things that KR did not initiate did not happen? There were others out there with rifles to protect businesses and strange how the ones who were not assaulted did not shoot anyone.
And lastly, since plenty of predictions of KR's future were made here, so one has to wonder what future would have awaited those who attacked KR had they chose not to assault him even though we will never know because they choose poorly...
Nearly impossible in the states that allow it.While I agree with it in principle, seems like a nightmare to enforce, trying to decide not only whether one was threatened, but if he had a viable retreat.
Of course, we could just ban people from walking around open carrying AR15s, but that would be too simple and effective.
The police and national guard were tasked with controlling the situation, you know, like people with actual training and equipment to do so. Not a 17 year old kid who wants to become a macho vigalante. Of course, now we see what a crybaby he really is in court. Certainly not someone emotionally mature enough to walk into a dangerous situation with a loaded AR15. And of course we have to have the usual right wing victim shaming. They still are human beings, with just the same right to not be gunned down as anyone else.
States would pay $10,000 bounty on successful civil suits against those who do not retreat. Defendants barred from recovering legal costs.
Nullification of common law (and now elections) is a conservative feature.If ever there was a fixed outcome, this trial was one of them. As lame as the prosecution's performance was, it's not out of the realm of plausibility to think they too played their part in the grand scheme of things.
It all reminds me of how McConnell piggybacked the last two Heritage sponsored activist conservative stooges into that packed supreme kangaroo court of theirs. Those fuckers now own that corrupted court and there was absolutely nothing ethical and moral about the way they went about it.
If the right wing wants to support vigilantes who fantasize on social media about having guns to shoot people they don't like, and then go insert themselves in situations to perform extra judicial killings, I now fully support armed liberals shooting up stop the steal pro Trump rallies where these people are trying to overthrow democracy. That is sedition. I couldn't think of a better reason to open fire on people, overthrowing democracy is a big deal to reasonable people. Shoot without mercy.
I'd also make it law that judge and any lawyers and any jury involved in the case do not support Trump. So they can't suppress evidence for example. Supporting Trump is supporting a traitor to America, therefore you are unfit and undeserving and unqualified to serve in a court of law in the you are trying to overthrow in any capacity.Make sure they get video of of someone else CLEARLY instigating an attack on them so it can be used as video in court for their defense....
Right, they’ll deny the racial profiling when picking the Albery jury pool. It’s not illegal to politically profile.I'd also make it law that judge and any lawyers and any jury involved in the case do not support Trump. So they can't suppress evidence for example. Supporting Trump is supporting a traitor to America, therefore you are unfit and undeserving and unqualified to serve in a court of law in the you are trying to overthrow in any capacity.
Fuck you and fuck all you people.
Fuck you and fuck all you people.
Your snowflaky faux concern is hilarious. Do you also cry when people 'badmouth' white supremacists and fascists? Wait...are you on the Kenosha PD?!?I thought personal attacks weren't allowed in PN anymore???
Right, they’ll deny the racial profiling when picking the Albery jury pool. It’s not illegal to politically profile.
Your snowflaky faux concern is hilarious. Do you also cry when people 'badmouth' white supremacists and fascists? Wait...are you on the Kenosha PD?!?
I'm guessing you don't like being called out on bullshit and idiocy? Just a guess, judging by your few posts in this thread.I don't frequent PN often...now I remember why....
I didn't find a valid statement to reply to, kind of a regular thing with you idiots. Your 'questions' were already discussed and gone over here in the thread. It isn't my fault if you ignore them and act like it's still questionable.If you have don't have any valid response, I guess you can go ahead and attack me again....