Right after the jury finishes deliberating.When is the verdict due?
there is no 'due' time, it's whenever the jury reaches a verdict or is ruled they are deadlocked.When is the verdict due?
Possession and purchase are 2 different things.Wonder why someone else had to buy it for him then, lol. Guess Dominick Black will walk too.
In which case they can replace locked jurors with the alternates.there is no 'due' time, it's whenever the jury reaches a verdict or is ruled they are deadlocked.
The irony of a traitor like you complaining about lefties not liking the constitution is just too much!
You mean the woman that was on the opposite side of a blocked door? Yeah, that one.It's a classic for sure.
I like this new one too, where violent "rioters" should be able to be shot like Kyle Rittenhouse did, but a "rioter" like Ashi Babbit? Well that's murder, she's a martyr.
Possession and purchase are 2 different things.
This right here is why I think that all elected officials should be required to pass drug screenings just like all the regular schmoes that have to for employment.My guess is that very few from wall street are peddling drugs on the street corner, something that would trigger a search. The first rule of crime is "Don't be seen".
You mean the woman that was on the opposite side of a blocked door? Yeah, that one.
I wouldn't have any issue with that at all. A yearly audit would be fine as well.This right here is why I think that all elected officials should be required to pass drug screenings just like all the regular schmoes that have to for employment.
In which case they can replace locked jurors with the alternates.
They’d have to be hung on all five (?) charges. They have the ability to be hung on one charge and not the others.No, you can't replace jurors in the event of a deadlock. You just end up with a hung jury.
They have the ability to be hung on one charge and not the others.
Of course taj is wrong...par for the course.That's right, but the point is you can't replace jurors with alternates to get a verdict on a charge when the jury can't agree. That's what taj is arguing.
This from the poster who openly hates the 14a and believes the 1a doesn't apply to any speech disagrees with... lol.Dreaming of no Constitution........ par for the leftist course.
My guess is that very few from wall street are peddling drugs on the street corner, something that would trigger a search. The first rule of crime is "Don't be seen".
Uniform and universal enforcement of bad laws would be the quickest way to get those laws repealed.This right here is why I think that all elected officials should be required to pass drug screenings just like all the regular schmoes that have to for employment.
didn't he say the something similar with Chauvin, or am I imagining that?Exactly as expected, Cucker is claiming jurors are scared to find Rittenhouse not guilty.
I’m sure Insannity will echo this, along with Laura Ingrate.
Edit...looks like Cucker is devoting his entire show to this.
Wouldn’t surprise me.didn't he say the something similar with Chauvin, or am I imagining that?
Remind us where in the Capitol building she was shot again?You mean the woman that was on the opposite side of a blocked door? Yeah, that one.
yes sounds like a logical plan, have a gun and if someone trys to rip it from your hands assume they are going to kill you with it and they are crazy.
Merely pointing a gun at someone IS a threat of lethal force. It is, for all the person down-barrel knows, the last step before pulling the trigger. If you have to wait for a trigger to be pulled before you can finally call someone with a firearm an imminent lethal threat, then you basically have to wait to be dead.
Say the situation was Grosskreutz witnessed Mr Rittenhouse shoot Rosenbaum and moved toward him with weapon drawn - Rittenhouse fires as he did and missed - And then Grosskreutz fires back and kills Rittenhouse. Or ... skateboard guy witnessed Rittenhouse shoot Rosenbaum - he moves toward him with his skateboard - Rittenhouse fires as he did and misses - Skateboard guy bashes Rittenhouse head in with his skateboard and kills him. Both cases are grounds for acquittal on self defense claims, Correct?