Outside of a few hours were I could not listen/watch while working, once one sees the entirety of the trial, it became obvious Rittenhouse should be found not guilty. It is so sad people died, but the assailants brought that upon themselves, not the victim - Kyle. I also found it interesting that independent media, not MSM, provided the facts of what ended up in the case.Can't believe anyone would have reasonably expected anything different after being presented with all the evidence. The only way he could have been found guilty is if they had allowed mail in voting.
Or maybe in a different city with a sequestered jury. I don’t believe for one second that they went home and never listened to their fav news sources.
And it didn’t take you 180 pages this time...Damn I love being right yet again.
We’ll never know.I don't know about that. Everything I saw on the news channels dealt with feelings and speculation that seemed to ignore the laws, as written, and the facts, as presented. In my opinion, the verdict reflects the latter.
Victim??? You cannot call yourself a 'victim' when shooting unarmed people. Maybe it wasn't Homicide, but not even reckless endangerment?? WTF!Outside of a few hours were I could not listen/watch while working, once one sees the entirety of the trial, it became obvious Rittenhouse should be found not guilty. It is so sad people died, but the assailants brought that upon themselves, not the victim - Kyle. I also found it interesting that independent media, not MSM, provided the facts of what ended up in the case.
Seriously? Just ask yourself, "Would the "assailants" have been dead if Rittenhouse had not been there with an AR15? He got away with killing 2 people. Maybe he was not legally guilty of homicide, but he most certainly is morally responsible for the deaths of 2 people.Outside of a few hours were I could not listen/watch while working, once one sees the entirety of the trial, it became obvious Rittenhouse should be found not guilty. It is so sad people died, but the assailants brought that upon themselves, not the victim - Kyle. I also found it interesting that independent media, not MSM, provided the facts of what ended up in the case.
Sooner or later liberals will come to the conclusion that the only option that remains to them is to also be heavily armed.
The grift must go on.No. He's going to be around for the next 5 years at least as a conservative commentator and gun rights advocate. He will make bank appearing for 30 seconds on various conservative TV news stations. Will be a millionaire by the time this is over. Conservative media darling. All of this because he shot two people to death and shot a third.
Or maybe in a different city with a sequestered jury. I don’t believe for one second that they went home and never listened to their fav news sources.
You gotta realize for the ammosexual crowd killing a “bad guy” with the object of their fetish is their ultimate dream.Seriously? Just ask yourself, "Would the "assailants" have been dead if Rittenhouse had not been there with an AR15? He got away with killing 2 people. Maybe he was not legally guilty of homicide, but he most certainly is morally responsible for the deaths of 2 people.
Outside of a few hours were I could not listen/watch while working, once one sees the entirety of the trial, it became obvious Rittenhouse should be found not guilty. It is so sad people died, but the assailants brought that upon themselves, not the victim - Kyle. I also found it interesting that independent media, not MSM, provided the facts of what ended up in the case.
I appreciate the emotional statements you make. I am only focused on the trial and facts that were brought out and the jury verdict after nearly 4 days of deliberations.Seriously? Just ask yourself, "Would the "assailants" have been dead if Rittenhouse had not been there with an AR15? He got away with killing 2 people. Maybe he was not legally guilty of homicide, but he most certainly is morally responsible for the deaths of 2 people.
TY. Your first statement is factually incorrect. The rest is a series of assumptions on your part from which you are drawing a conclusion to fit your narrative.You're only saying that because you identify with Rittenhouse and not the victims. But if those identities we're swapped, you'd not only be howling for the death sentence, you probably would've gotten it.
What's really interesting is how conservatives don't see how deeply driven by identity politics they are.
The bias and slant of your stated opinions has been obvious for a long time, you don't have to pretend just for this topic.TY. Your first statement is factually incorrect. The rest is a series of assumptions on your part from which you are drawing a conclusion to fit your narrative.
Nope. Believe it or not, we read what you guys post, here and elsewhere, and believe every word of the fucked up, angry, everyone-I-don't-like-must-die BS you say.TY. Your first statement is factually incorrect. The rest is a series of assumptions on your part from which you are drawing a conclusion to fit your narrative.
Yes, American justice and the rule of law wins again. Not guilty on all counts, self defense wins.No way!!!
/sarcasm