I know, it's hilarious. I mean, I wouldn't doubt that he's the smartest guy that he knows. But, you know, king of shit hill and all.
The guy who lied about having a law degree wants to tell us about who he thinks is a good source of legal analysis.
You are just being coy as you know damn well this discussion is about the AR 15 that KR used, the very one this whole line of discussion is about. You know that, as you are the one who put up the link and pictures about the "small" differences between the AR15 and the M4. So stop with your manipulation BS.
With that said, go look up what classifies a gun as an assault weapon by definition.. Note what classifies it as an assault weapon.. (hint, it's primarily having the ability to switch between automatic and semi automatic mode). The definition doesn't give a fuck if it's a deer rifle or a squirrel rifle.. Only people who like to try to use manipulation in their argument do. Which leads us back to the point I was making about the ability to mod the AR15 to be automatic. You can't manipulate your way out of that very fact, which is all you are trying to do..
cool. so ban them.You can modify ANY Semiautomatic to become fully automatic.
I've said this several times.
cool. so ban them.
Good luck with that.
To say an AR15 is literally the same as an M4 for example is silly.
Why? do you have eyes like I have eyes? I have eyes. Maybe you don't?
Obviously you are ignorant on the subject.
I agree that the "LOOK" almost the same.
you turned a subject about how normal functioning people in society approach the world into one where unsociable ammosexuals like yourself think the rest of the world need to appease your wholly useless lust for gun porn in order to talk about the subject of how the toys you love murder people.
You have no idea how useless your semantics are when it comes to engaging this topic in any relevant way. Go shove a few clips up your ass, Francis.
I thought it was easy to understand that I was talking about visualization and emulation. To that end, the picture you included makes my point.
cool. so ban them.
you turned a subject about how normal functioning people in society approach the world into one where unsociable ammosexuals like yourself think the rest of the world need to appease your wholly useless lust for gun porn in order to talk about the subject of how the toys you love murder people.
You have no idea how useless your semantics are when it comes to engaging this topic in any relevant way. Go shove a few clips up your ass, Francis.
two pictures of big black murder toys. Literally no difference.
That is how fucked this place is. I have stated many times that I have no problem with proper gun control laws.
Ammosexual my ass.
You are the one that stated that:
There is literally no difference between a Military Assault rifle and an AR15.
You sure about that?
two pictures of big black murder toys. Literally no difference.
You sure about that?
Good god! Learn to fucking read! Both of you also need to learn to follow a conversation unless derailing the conversation is your goal.
Good god! Learn to fucking read! Both of you also need to learn to follow a conversation unless derailing the conversation is your goal.
Since the original post was a poll on what the verdict might be is a mute point now there is no thread to derail.
The Arbery case suggests otherwise.I really couldn’t care less about KR and whether or not he got convicted or not, what concerns me is what this ruling means and that is that vigilantism is ok and so is killing people in cold blood so long as there is a hint of self defense. The ruling also makes it clear that you had better kill the person and not injure them if you want to be free from convictions.
It’s a bad precedent to set and will have enormous consequences that will not make this country safer. The lack of foresight by the right, while unsurprising, is really unfortunate.
The guy who lied about having a law degree wants to tell us about who he thinks is a good source of legal analysis.
I really couldn’t care less about KR and whether or not he got convicted or not, what concerns me is what this ruling means and that is that vigilantism is ok and so is killing people in cold blood so long as there is a hint of self defense. The ruling also makes it clear that you had better kill the person and not injure them if you want to be free from convictions.
It’s a bad precedent to set and will have enormous consequences that will not make this country safer. The lack of foresight by the right, while unsurprising, is really unfortunate.
Suggests what?
You are one delusional white supremacist.I didn't lie about anything dickhead. Which you seem to do incessantly. Also, unlike you or anyone else on this forum, I have been 100% right on every legal case I've talked about. I also cite actual practicing attorneys and even link their info as well when I use them. Most around here want to cite looney non practicing attorneys like Devin or someone from CNN like they have any. A legal expert for CNN is basically what Nick Rivera is to a doctor:
I welcome you to go back through my post history for every case I posted a predicted outcome and see I had never been wrong so far. I don't have a JD, but I have more than a fair share of classes in legal analysis and applications of laws. I have family members that do have JD and had practiced at one point. As I've mentioned as well, I tend to use a large source of various lawyers and watch what they say. This includes Devin who I did say gets things right when the case isn't politically charged. Or when he is doing a video on pure procedure. Those are just ones that post videos, I talk to a fair share of actual attorneys I've come to know over the years (mostly through family connections) or even in video games (you'd be surprised how many lawyers play MMOs for some reason).
Still being coy and playing stupid to what my point was, which I even spelled it out to you. Please, carry on acting acting like a complete ignorant dumbass.You can modify ANY Semiautomatic to become fully automatic.
I've said this several times.
Hey, dumbfuck, the very article you posted says the m4 and ar-15 are basically the same gun, except for the automatic feature the AR-15 does not have. Let me guess, you cherry pick only certain pieces in that article, that you believe supports your bullshit, just like you do about everything else.. "The world according to pcgeek11". Fuck all to everything else.Good luck with that.
To say an AR15 is literally the same as an M4 for example is silly.