justoh
Diamond Member
- Jun 11, 2013
- 3,686
- 81
- 91
It gives rocket science a bad name; it makes them look like a bunch of dorks with the fashion sense of a porn producer.
Your point being?
It gives rocket science a bad name; it makes them look like a bunch of dorks with the fashion sense of a porn producer.
Yes, and I think this is a stance a lot of people are taking. I also think that if it were limited to that there wouldn't have been any real controversy and the press coverage would have been a lot lower. But we're talking about this now because a vocal group of people have deemed this "casual misogyny" and an example of how women aren't welcome in STEM.
It gives rocket science a bad name; it makes them look like a bunch of dorks with the fashion sense of a porn producer.
Nah. It's simply idiotic and gives true feminism a bad name.
Even though a woman gave him the shirt. Someone should let her know she's oppressing herself.
There's that small-mindedness, I was referring to.
Are you from texas by any chance?
So you're saying that judging people by their appearance is in fact the correct way to do things?
Good, we can all go back to the way things were, and only pretty women matter. Uggos should shut up.
Thanks for clearing that up.
Oh, so we're just going for rampant hyperbole today? Is that why you want to kill every woman in the world? You depraved monster.
Also not appropriate for going out in public.
Why?
Planning on painting me with a broad brush?
Do you suppose if this guy had been gay and wearing a shirt covered in cartoon dongs that such a fuss would have been made?
That's sexist
... Yes? Are you implying it wouldn't?
But that was your intention, correct? (To stereotype me based on where I live?)
I'll help you.
I am (in no particular order):
- pro-small government
- pro-gun
- pro-choice
- pro-environment
- pro-nuclear
- pro-woman
- pro-self-determination
- anti-war
- anti-tax
Which of your little groups do I fit in? :hmm:
That's exactly what I'm implying.
If there was any outrage over flamboyantly gay attire in the "wrong setting" it would be coming from an entirely different group. The right wing nutjobs would be up in arms.
Instead the only ones up in arms are the left wing nutjobs. It's always nice of you to self-identify so normal people can ignore your insanity.
If you think this is just complaining from wannabes who cant hold a candle to someone who just landed a probe on a comet, youre wrong. Talk to my friend, the cosmologist Katie Mack. Or the planetary scientist Sarah Horst. Or geologist Mika McKinnon. Or astrophysicist Catherine Q.* Or planetary geologist Emily Lakdawalla. Or radio astronomer Nicole Gugliucci. Or professor and science communicator extraordinaire Pamela Gay. Or Carolyn Porco, who worked on the Voyager mission and is the leader of the Cassini imaging team, the space probe thats been orbiting Saturn for over a decade now.
Please apologize for your blatant sexism from earlier, with tears. Or are you a hypocrite?
?
Edit:
If you're referring to "broad brush", you should ..ahem...brush up on your English idioms:
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/paint_with_a_broad_brush
Whether or not you intended to be offensive, i was offended, and now i'm demanding an apology. Stop deflecting.
Oh, I get it now! You're an idiot!
Yeah, if you can't tell the difference between you misinterpreting a phrase and someone wearing an obviously inappropriate shirt we're done here.
That's exactly what I'm implying.
If there was any outrage over flamboyantly gay attire in the "wrong setting" it would be coming from an entirely different group. The right wing nutjobs would be up in arms.
Instead the only ones up in arms are the left wing nutjobs. It's always nice of you to self-identify so normal people can ignore your insanity.
Face it, that shirt was completely inappropriate for the event.
So your contention is that it is absolutely impossible for someone to think that a shirt featuring either half-naked women OR half-naked men is somehow inappropriate in a professional setting? Only feminists will complain about one, only "right wing nutjobs" the other? That's absurd. Most people would probably think that a shirt featuring a half-naked adult of any gender in a sexual pose is not something you should wear in a professional environment, period. It doesn't have to be about feminism or homophobia, it's about keeping sex out of the workplace. This is why so many professional offices have to resort to dress codes. Apparently the concept of "keep sexual situations out of the office" is too confounding for some people to grasp.