News Roe v. Wade overturned

[sportage]

CNN: Supreme Court leak investigation heats up as clerks are asked for phone records in unprecedented move

You know, they aren't ever gonna find the guy or gal because it WAS someone sitting on the high court. Either a justice, or the wife of a justice too giddy with glee to keep a secret after hubby leaked the decision to her. And we all know who we're talking about.

And so, dare the high court go after a sitting justice? Or the wife of a sitting justice? Can we ever trust these guys or their wives again?
Hmmm, need a clue? Just name a name that rimes with giddy? How bout Ginni? Giddy old Ginni, too excited to keep a secret and too willing to put one over on those evil abortion-loving democrats. No doubt Clarence was all in for prematurely letting the cat out of the bag, and who better to do that than Giddy old Ginni herself?
Oh That Beaver....

 

[fskimospy]

CNN: Supreme Court leak investigation heats up as clerks are asked for phone records in unprecedented move

You know, they aren't ever gonna find the guy or gal because it WAS someone sitting on the high court. Either a justice, or the wife of a justice too giddy with glee to keep a secret after hubby leaked the decision to her. And we all know who we're talking about.

And so, dare the high court go after a sitting justice? Or the wife of a sitting justice? Can we ever trust these guys or their wives again?
Hmmm, need a clue? Just name a name that rimes with giddy? How bout Ginni? Giddy old Ginni, too excited to keep a secret and too willing to put one over on those evil abortion-loving democrats. No doubt Clarence was all in for prematurely letting the cat out of the bag, and who better to do that than Giddy old Ginni herself?
Oh That Beaver....

View attachment 62391

Maybe while the Supreme Court is at it they can check the phone records of their wives and see if any of them tried a coup.

 

[dank69]

Maybe while the Supreme Court is at it they can check the phone records of their wives and see if any of them tried a coup.

You can't do a coup if you're a Republican. You are just helping God's chosen ones through whatever means are necessary.

 

[Fenixgoon]

Maybe while the Supreme Court is at it they can check the phone records of their wives and see if any of them tried a coup.

it's only a coup if it's from the coup d'etat region of france. otherwise it's just sparkling insurrection.

/stolen joke

edit: man, remember when brutuskend had his stolen jokes? makes me really feel like a lifer here now...i'm old. put me down (and i'm maybe half of boomer's age! )

 

[conehead433]

It would surely seem to me that forcing a woman to have a child that she can not afford to care for, or doesn't have the ability to care for is a violation of the 8th ammendment. The Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution states that: “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.”

 

[Brovane]

I found this to be very interesting discussion between a OB/Gyn and ZDoggMD.

She brought up some interesting points about how the current Anti-Abortion laws can take away treatment options for doctors.
She brought a concern around what is called a missed-abortion. That is the fetus has miscarriage so the pregnancy is no longer viable but the fetus is still inside the uterus. You need to get the fetus out of the Uterus before it becomes septic but it isn't a elective termination.
She also brought up the issue for a lot of people without adequate health-care. You can have a problem that someone is coming in for their first pre-natal visit at 14-16 weeks but during the examination something else is discovered like pelvic cancer. Now there is a dilemma that you want to start radiation treatment ASAP but cannot along as the woman is pregnant.

Abortion: Medical & Ethical Realities (w/Dr. Alexandre West)

 

[fskimospy]

I found this to be very interesting discussion between a OB/Gyn and ZDoggMD.

She brought up some interesting points about how the current Anti-Abortion laws can take away treatment options for doctors.
She brought a concern around what is called a missed-abortion. That is the fetus has miscarriage so the pregnancy is no longer viable but the fetus is still inside the uterus. You need to get the fetus out of the Uterus before it becomes septic but it isn't a elective termination.
She also brought up the issue for a lot of people without adequate health-care. You can have a problem that someone is coming in for their first pre-natal visit at 14-16 weeks but during the examination something else is discovered like pelvic cancer. Now there is a dilemma that you want to start radiation treatment ASAP but cannot along as the woman is pregnant.

Abortion: Medical & Ethical Realities (w/Dr. Alexandre West)

It's things like this that I believe will cause problems for Republicans, but not until 2024 as there's not enough time here. Even current abortion laws can cause problems like this but the ones Roe has prevented from passing or the ones Republicans are now passing in response to Roe's likely reversal are so extreme you're going to end up with all sorts of horror stories like these, and worse.

For a long time now Republicans have run their primary elections on who can be more anti-abortion, knowing their craziest laws will never go into effect and therefore most people won't really care. Now they will go into effect and people will not like what they see I think.

 

[trenchfoot]

So hey, will someone who is Bible smart (King James version) please pinpoint some scripture that definitively describes when a fertilized egg theoretically becomes a human being? Or is an unfertilized egg also a human being?

Inquisitive minds would like that cleared up for purposes of discussion.

edit - I'm sure some conservative judge over at the USSC could answer that question, yes?

 

[the actual truth]

CNN: Supreme Court leak investigation heats up as clerks are asked for phone records in unprecedented move

You know, they aren't ever gonna find the guy or gal because it WAS someone sitting on the high court. Either a justice, or the wife of a justice too giddy with glee to keep a secret after hubby leaked the decision to her. And we all know who we're talking about.

And so, dare the high court go after a sitting justice? Or the wife of a sitting justice? Can we ever trust these guys or their wives again?
Hmmm, need a clue? Just name a name that rimes with giddy? How bout Ginni? Giddy old Ginni, too excited to keep a secret and too willing to put one over on those evil abortion-loving democrats. No doubt Clarence was all in for prematurely letting the cat out of the bag, and who better to do that than Giddy old Ginni herself?
Oh That Beaver....

View attachment 62391

Mr.Barking Dog, I remember when women had a longer version of that hairstyle, and it was considered to be the trend. It looked hot.

 

[Roger Wilco]

Get ready for a lifetime of this Brett.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1534544199093297152

 

[Pens1566]

Get ready for a lifetime of this Brett.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1534544199093297152

It was either Squee or Donkey Dong Doug.

 

[Brainonska511]

Get ready for a lifetime of this Brett.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1534544199093297152

He was just exercising his first and second amendment rights, right?

 

[dank69]

He was just exercising his first and second amendment rights, right?

Legitimate public discourse.

 

[K1052]

McConnell is spending his day screaming that his justices must be protected from the world he's made.

Also the court will soon hand down a decision expanding the ability of people to carry and preventing states from telling them no so these events are ironically timed.

 

[Pens1566]

McConnell is spending his day screaming that his justices must be protected from the world he's made.

Also the court will soon hand down a decision expanding the ability of people to carry and preventing states from telling them no so these events are ironically timed.

Pre-emptive "thoughts and prayers".

 

[nakedfrog]

He was just exercising his first and second amendment rights, right?

I'm told the 2nd Amendment is there to stop tyrannical governments, it's not hard to argue that removing bodily autonomy is tyrannical, so...

 

[gothuevos]

Get ready for a lifetime of this Brett.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1534544199093297152

Oh man, the RW media ecosystem will have a field day with this. Democrats should try to get out in front and condemn this. But I gotta admit, there's something a little bit too much on the nose with "young CA man upset about Roe" trying to harm Kavanaugh, but then was stopped by an anonymous tip? Not saying it's a false flag, but just seems really well scripted.

 

[brycejones]

Oh man, the RW media ecosystem will have a field day with this. Democrats should try to get out in front and condemn this. But I gotta admit, there's something a little bit too much on the nose with "young CA man upset about Roe" trying to harm Kavanaugh, but then was stopped by an anonymous tip? Not saying it's a false flag, but just seems really well scripted.

Don’t be a left wing q tard

 

[sactoking]

I don't understand why this Bort Kavanaugh news is in this thread. I mean, I get that the implication is this is related to the impending Roe verdict but if there's one thing that's been hammered home over the years it's that gun violence, whether real or threatened, has no correlation or causation to any inputs that make sense and can only be traced back to things that you might overlook such as unlocked doors, bootstraps, and lone wolf mentalities.

 

[Captante]

So hey, will someone who is Bible smart (King James version) please pinpoint some scripture that definitively describes when a fertilized egg theoretically becomes a human being?

The only "eggs" the primitives who actually wrote the bible knew about dropped from the rear-end of a chicken.

 

[conehead433]

You are perfectly within your rights to be armed and protest near someone's home. Making threats however, even categorized as a misdemeanor, can land you in jail for up to a year and up to $1000 fine.

 

[UNCjigga]

California man with a gun arrested near Justice Kavanaugh’s home—he told authorities he was there to kill him. Sheeit. Maybe we need to rethink some way for the public or our representatives to recall/impeach SCOTUS justices, because we shouldn’t have to rely on “a Second Amendment solution.”

Armed man arrested near Brett Kavanaugh's home charged with attempting to murder a US judge

He told law enforcement he had traveled from California to kill "a specific United States Supreme Court Justice."

www.cnn.com

 

[pmv]

I'm told the 2nd Amendment is there to stop tyrannical governments, it's not hard to argue that removing bodily autonomy is tyrannical, so...

View attachment 62795

One could argue that this demonstrates how that justification for the 2nd amendment doesn't really work, as it hasn't prevented this particular bit of tyrannical behaviour, and because this particular attempt to unilaterally introduce term-limits, failed entirely.

But the whole topic seems full of contradictions, to me. For one thing, the same event that yet again demonstrated the utterly horrific concequences of the 2nd Amendment, at the same time also provided evidence for the argument that you can't rely on the police to help you - because so many of them are &^$*ing useless at their jobs.

 

[Zorba]

I found this to be very interesting discussion between a OB/Gyn and ZDoggMD.

She brought up some interesting points about how the current Anti-Abortion laws can take away treatment options for doctors.
She brought a concern around what is called a missed-abortion. That is the fetus has miscarriage so the pregnancy is no longer viable but the fetus is still inside the uterus. You need to get the fetus out of the Uterus before it becomes septic but it isn't a elective termination.
She also brought up the issue for a lot of people without adequate health-care. You can have a problem that someone is coming in for their first pre-natal visit at 14-16 weeks but during the examination something else is discovered like pelvic cancer. Now there is a dilemma that you want to start radiation treatment ASAP but cannot along as the woman is pregnant.

Abortion: Medical & Ethical Realities (w/Dr. Alexandre West)

Yeah, my wife had a miscarriage around 9 weeks, but wasn't discovered until 13 weeks. It was a partial molar, so other tissue kept growing (discovered after the fact). She had to have a D&C. Without the D&C it would've very likely developed into cancer.

 

[Zorba]

He was just exercising his first and second amendment rights, right?

According to Bret the first amendment only applies if he was trying to deliver a suitcase full of money. Actual speech from a poor, nah that isn't protected.