Looks like one of the state rights justices left this out as well in the list of cases to overturn Coker v. Georgia ... oh wait.... they like Matt Gatez, and Matt Gatez would not like that ruling to be over turned.
Much agreed. Which is why so many millions are upset with the Jao Baiduns installation.Ignoring elections to install the loser is the opposite of a free state
Much agreed. Which is why so many millions are upset with the Jao Baiduns installation.
I actually have bad news for those that think Trump should go to jail. In order for Trump to go to jail for "repeatedly being involved in acts that jepordize the Democracy in America", all jurors must find Trump not just guilty of a single act, but must also all agree that Trump did this repeatedly.
RICHARDSON v. UNITED STATES
In a free state, people shouldn't have to die because the government has ruled a specific healthcare procedure that they don't agree with on religious grounds to be illegal, yeah?Political tyranny is the opposite of a free state, no?
Like the fact like you are upset about random tweets, but not a coordinated, violent insurrection.Classy. Hope I didn't hurt your feelings. Hypocrisy comes in all flavors.
I'm no constitutional scholar but it does explicitly state the right to bear arms is necessary to the security of a free state.
In the context of a well regulated militia. We have none of that going on. But you are simply dishonest.I'm no constitutional scholar but it does explicitly state the right to bear arms is necessary to the security of a free state.
Oh yes, the violent insurrection. How could we forget about all those Trump supporting, AR wielding, MAGA insanos that violently stormed the capitol. Oh wait...Like the fact like you are upset about random tweets, but not a coordinated, violent insurrection.
Are you claiming a violent insurrection didn’t happen on January 6th?Oh yes, the violent insurrection. How could we forget about all those Trump supporting, AR wielding, MAGA insanos that violently stormed the capitol. Oh wait...
I wouldn't describe it as being "upset". Concerned, yes. Not like we're talking about those dreadful mean tweets from Trump, right?
I would argue that everyone on the republican side just wanted the opportunity to verify the elections were in fact, free. But instead we got a big "no standing" from SCOTUS. The whole issue with election integrity was the confidence got destroyed when democrats didn't support any transparency.You don't seem to comprehend or appreciate the hypocrisy in the SCOTUS' decisions on gun control and Roe v Wade just now. Probably safe to say your disclaimer there is entirely unnecessary.
Regardless, you are the kind of poster who presents misleading info in bad faith, as we've established in another thread already. Predictably, you've left out the militia and well regulated parts. In essence, you and the others that place guns ahead of kids are puffing up patriotically over Marion Hammer's warped interpretation of something that was meant to assuage slave owners losing sleep over Haiti. That's what this boils down to. Love of the Constitution just doesn't fly from the same people still trying to kill elections and prevent people from exercising their Constitutional right to vote.
What's necessary for the security of this state is that it not be governed by a religious and political minority that holds itself above the law.
Oh yes, the violent insurrection. How could we forget about all those Trump supporting, AR wielding, MAGA insanos that violently stormed the capitol. Oh wait...
I wouldn't describe it as being "upset". Concerned, yes. Not like we're talking about those dreadful mean tweets from Trump, right?
And this Divine Court has no use nor concern for any precedent, they are irrelevant if the religious conservatives decide they are inconvenient.There are numerous Supreme Court cases that give the right to women to get an out of state abortion, and not get stoped by the state to do so.
* Crandall v. Nevada, 73 U.S. 35 (1868) Freedom of movement between states is a fundamental right; a state cannot inhibit people from leaving it by imposing a tax on doing so.
* Kent v. Dulles, 357 U.S. 116 (1958) The right to travel is a part of the "liberty" of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment.
* United States v. Guest, 383 U.S. 745 (1966) There is a constitutional right to travel from state to state, and the protections of the Fourteenth Amendment extend to citizens who suffer deprivations of their rights at the hands of a private conspiracy where there is state participation in the conspiracy, no matter how minimal.
* Corfield v. Coryell, 6 Fed. Cas. 546 (C.C.E.D. Pa. 1823) Some of the rights protected by the Privileges and Immunities Clause include the freedom of movement through the states, the right of access to the courts, the right to purchase and hold property, an exemption from higher taxes than those paid by state residents, and the right to vote. This case was decided by Supreme Court Justice Bushrod Washington while riding circuit in the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. It is notable for Washington asserting the existence of cognizable rights within the ambit of the Privileges and Immunities Clause that are nowhere within the Constitution's text.
* Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. 264 (1821) State laws in opposition to national laws are void. The U.S. Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction for any U.S. case and final say.
* Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1 (1958) The states are bound by the decisions of the Supreme Court and cannot choose to ignore them.
But the courts did verify this. Are you saying we shouldn’t believe the courts?I would argue that everyone on the republican side just wanted the opportunity to verify the elections were in fact, free. But instead we got a big "no standing" from SCOTUS. The whole issue with election integrity was the confidence got destroyed when democrats didn't support any transparency.
Maybe he is getting tired of being sodemized by his wife & co on a daily basis.Info also has come out that he wishes to overturn supreme court decisions that implied sodemy can't be illegal.
The US is just a terrible backwards place, with just a few (albeit very large) pockets of decency. When people say that the US is great, or that "a lot of people want to move there", they mostly just talk about California/NY and a handful of other blue state. The others are mostly just terrible.
GG for the GOP, they played the long game. With the help of gerrymandering, some luck with RBG, Fox news, and the Federalist society - they got what they wanted. I've seen enough politics in the US to understand that the Democrats will get wiped out in the mid-terms even after this terrible week.
People can whine all they want with regards to the fact that the SC judges lied in their hearings, it doesn't matter now. Susan Collins will say that she was cheated or whatever, and I've seen that Manchin admit to that as well. The judges won't get impeached. The democrats have very few options, given the state of the Senate - and it'll only get worse after the mid-terms.
You are correct as long as the woman doesn't return to the state. You are also forgetting states have allowed vigilante enforcement so the rules are now changed.
Poor lil guy and you even had to make a lil story like this up for the forum.So my friend just texted me asking for a ride tomorrow.. she never even knew she got pregnant.. was still having her period but felt strange pain at times. Doctor said she's pregnant.
She said she could drive herself but doesn't trust driving back home.
Fuck you scotus! Gonna be a friend over what you want me to be!