So as long as Republican's favor treating men and women as equals single women will never vote for them
What does that say about women?
As long as people of your mindset are in the Republican party there will never again be a Republican President!!
It`s nice to have a living and breathing example of what is wrong with the Republican party!
As long as the Republicans keep mouthing pregnancy from rape is a god's blessing, they're doomed to fail. What kind of a god do these people worship?
Romneys campaign team when confronted with a number of errors in statements and speeches famously explained that: "Were not going to let our campaign be dictated by fact-checkers". Or in other words: "We shall say what we want to win and we dont care if you say if its true or not". He accused Barack Obama of going on a foreign tour and "apologising for America". He didnt. He criticised the president for breaking a promise to keep unemployment under 8 per cent. He never said such a thing. He insisted his economic policies would create 12 million new jobs in four years, but the figures his campaign supplied simply didnt add up. Those are just three examples from a candidate described by one critic as being engaged in "foundational lying". In the last week of the contest, campaigning in Ohio, the Republican hopeful suggested a local car maker was planning to shift production to China. The company boss, in a fairly unusual intervention in a presidential election, said the claim was false. In the final few days of the election, the row badly damaged a candidate who desperately needed success in Ohio.
romney lost because he is the same as obama, both serve special interests. Too many idiots voted for obama and deserve to suffer the consequences of the economy, I would have no problem with welfare leeches having it taken away since there is no money.
The main reason he lost was because there was no fiscal Conservatism and the religious nutbars who scared away voters
Thats not the issue at all.....but that is a good example of turning an issue around to suit your needs...So as long as Republican's favor treating men and women as equals single women will never vote for them
What does that say about women?
Thnats not the issue at all.....but that is a good example of turning an issue around to suit your needs...
The bottom line is the Republican party lost because women know they would not have anything close to be equal to men........
There is no way on earth that as a man you can or should be able to deny a womans right to do as she sees fit with her body.......to claim that a raped woman should not abort that baby because it was God`s will that she be raped is just plain not right and smacks of a severe psychological problem.
Then we have the Gay issue....regardless of what the talking points are for or against the gay issue there are enough gay people to upset the apple cart and sway an election...legalize it and move on....
(1) Liberals are the ones who have been saying men and women are the same for decades. In fact see comparisons of same-sex marriage to interracial marriage for the latest exampel
(2) Both men and women need health care. So on the question of health care it is irrelevant.
(3) And why do women need special programs to meet their needs, but men do not?
"Liberals" (lol) do believe men and women should have the same rights as human beings.
You then take a huge leap to equate that to equal needs. Why would equal rights be dependent on equal needs? Should the elderly be considered inferior? Children? Those with health issues?
Women, b/c of their ability to bear children, will have unique health care needs that don't apply to men. Simply b/c this extra need exists, you try to equate that to inferiority.
This is where I believe we will always disagree.
That is just fine. I cannot remember what state I worked in that when you were hired if you were a female you were asked if you were pregnant. If you were hired and found to be pregnant after the fact you could be fired for lying during the interview and that company did not have to assist you in anyway...so i totally sympathize with you being an employer....Not trying to be sexist, but as a small business owner, I loathe to hire a woman in childbearing age as this basically guarantees I will have a less productive worker than an equivalent man. While on maternity leave I will continue paying her wages while I double pay by keeping a temp to cover for her.
Not trying to be sexist, but as a small business owner, I loathe to hire a woman in childbearing age as this basically guarantees I will have a less productive worker than an equivalent man. While on maternity leave I will continue paying her wages while I double pay by keeping a temp to cover for her.
Not trying to be sexist, but as a small business owner, I loathe to hire a woman in childbearing age as this basically guarantees I will have a less productive worker than an equivalent man. While on maternity leave I will continue paying her wages while I double pay by keeping a temp to cover for her.
Oops! Team Romney accidentally releases their victory website... after he lost
"Liberals" (lol) do believe men and women should have the same rights as human beings.
You then take a huge leap to equate that to equal needs. Why would equal rights be dependent on equal needs? Should the elderly be considered inferior? Children? Those with health issues?
Women, b/c of their ability to bear children, will have unique health care needs that don't apply to men. Simply b/c this extra need exists, you try to equate that to inferiority.
This is where I believe we will always disagree.
Regardless of the above, why wouldn't women voters be able to get funding for their interests? And if they get funding, why would that have any impact on their rights?
.
Sounds about right. I'm not an atheist by any means, but I have a problem with people basing their policy-making decisions on religion(s), which is what Conservatism seems to be all about these days.
Not trying to be sexist, but as a small business owner, I loathe to hire a woman in childbearing age as this basically guarantees I will have a less productive worker than an equivalent man. While on maternity leave I will continue paying her wages while I double pay by keeping a temp to cover for her.
I guess you can't hire males either since fathers are entitled to leave for up to 12 weeks also under the FMLA.