Really? Or is it because there are mountains of evidence showing how stupid his policy is?
My guess is, like usual, you've got nothing to say that has any factual basis. You have no "argument to the contrary." You just have your delusions.
Originally posted by: Perry404
Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
Originally posted by: Perry404
Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
Originally posted by: Perry404
Originally posted by: Skoorb
What about the part about him not winning the first 2/5 you'd tone back the RP stuff?Originally posted by: Perry404
Originally posted by: Sinsear
Originally posted by: Perry404
If he doesn't win 2/5 first primaries I'll stop posting about Ron Paul because this nation will be finished.
Referenced from Why Ron Paul is going to Win New Hampshire
OH MY GOSH I WAS WRONG ABOUT SOMETHING!! :Q
You are one hell of a detective!!!
Now I should warn you there is a slight possibility that I may even be wrong again some day. At least you're not desperate though.:laugh:
I am sorry. I guess I hadn't realized how in love with the truth I was.
Anyway in case you hadn't noticed I have been posting VERY little the past month. It's all the NEW Paul supporters that are posting nowadays.
God bless'em. I am glad that I still hold a place in your heart though.
I did notice. I was hoping it would stay that way to be honest and now that Ron Paul has cemented himself as a serious non-contender, can't you stop posting threads about how he "blows" away Denver?
Better get used to it. More and more people are coming to understand each day that Ron Paul is not only telling the truth but he is correct on both the monetary issue and foreign policy.
I would encourage you to stay open minded.
People are falling for his short-sighted idiocy because they're scared. He's a snake-oil salesman trying to push something that will cost American billions and billions of dollars and not even fix the issue it's supposed to address.
The monetary portion of Ron Paul's campaign is shameful and a disgrace. Well over 90% of America recognizes this fact, except those who are too blinded by Ron's own message.
I would encourage you to open you eyes and see Ron Paul for who he really is, unfortunately, you've fallen in line with his army of mindless zombies and there is no hope for you. You take mountains of evidence and ignore it. You selectively quote those who support Ron's idiocy, but turn a blind eye to the thousands of quotes, papers, and peer-reviewed publications who call Ron Paul's monetary policy out for what it is - a sham.
You actually believe that 90% of America has a clue about what's going on in the world much less how monetary policy works? Lolowsers!:laugh:
Rather than respond I will let your comments stand on their own. I couldn't make an argument to the contrary any better than you have.
Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
Originally posted by: Perry404
Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
Originally posted by: Perry404
Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
Originally posted by: Perry404
Originally posted by: Skoorb
What about the part about him not winning the first 2/5 you'd tone back the RP stuff?Originally posted by: Perry404
Originally posted by: Sinsear
Originally posted by: Perry404
If he doesn't win 2/5 first primaries I'll stop posting about Ron Paul because this nation will be finished.
Referenced from Why Ron Paul is going to Win New Hampshire
OH MY GOSH I WAS WRONG ABOUT SOMETHING!! :Q
You are one hell of a detective!!!
Now I should warn you there is a slight possibility that I may even be wrong again some day. At least you're not desperate though.:laugh:
I am sorry. I guess I hadn't realized how in love with the truth I was.
Anyway in case you hadn't noticed I have been posting VERY little the past month. It's all the NEW Paul supporters that are posting nowadays.
God bless'em. I am glad that I still hold a place in your heart though.
I did notice. I was hoping it would stay that way to be honest and now that Ron Paul has cemented himself as a serious non-contender, can't you stop posting threads about how he "blows" away Denver?
Better get used to it. More and more people are coming to understand each day that Ron Paul is not only telling the truth but he is correct on both the monetary issue and foreign policy.
I would encourage you to stay open minded.
People are falling for his short-sighted idiocy because they're scared. He's a snake-oil salesman trying to push something that will cost American billions and billions of dollars and not even fix the issue it's supposed to address.
The monetary portion of Ron Paul's campaign is shameful and a disgrace. Well over 90% of America recognizes this fact, except those who are too blinded by Ron's own message.
I would encourage you to open you eyes and see Ron Paul for who he really is, unfortunately, you've fallen in line with his army of mindless zombies and there is no hope for you. You take mountains of evidence and ignore it. You selectively quote those who support Ron's idiocy, but turn a blind eye to the thousands of quotes, papers, and peer-reviewed publications who call Ron Paul's monetary policy out for what it is - a sham.
You actually believe that 90% of America has a clue about what's going on in the world much less how monetary policy works? Lolowsers!:laugh:
Rather than respond I will let your comments stand on their own. I couldn't make an argument to the contrary any better than you have.
Really? Or is it because there are mountains of evidence showing how stupid his policy is?
My guess is, like usual, you've got nothing to say that has any factual basis. You have no "argument to the contrary." You just have your delusions.
Originally posted by: Perry404
Originally posted by: Sinsear
Originally posted by: Perry404
If he doesn't win 2/5 first primaries I'll stop posting about Ron Paul because this nation will be finished.
Referenced from Why Ron Paul is going to Win New Hampshire
OH MY GOSH I WAS WRONG ABOUT SOMETHING!! :Q
You are one hell of a detective!!!
Now I should warn you there is a slight possibility that I may even be wrong again some day.
Originally posted by: Perry404
Well it has come right down to it. My understanding of the political world this week has been turned on its head. After many years of calling myself a conservative republican and voting to stay the course(although i did not support the war originally) i have finally succumbed to the conspiracy theorists and bought into their message. I have spent dozens of hours reviewing the evidence over the past 10 days and i am 90% certain from the science & evidence that i have seen that at the very least our government knew that the 9/11 attacks were going to take place.
I am now one of those crazies.
I started to look at the evidence because i couldn't help but notice just how many scholars around the country and the world have been screaming for a new investigation. I could not escape the evidence that the cia had been working with Pakistan?s isi who supported Al qaeda right up until 9/11. Why are hundreds of engineers from around the nation vehemently disagreeing that the collapse of these structure were do to fire?
Why was the steel, primarily the 47 center columns, immediately shipped out of the country and recycled(melted down) before a forensic analysis could be done? Wasn't Rudolf Giuliani a former federal prosecutor? Did he not know that it was a federal offense to interfere with a crime scene? Why didn't the federal government SCREAM bloody murder when the stuff was being hauled off?
Or did we just "already know" who attacked the towers so there was no need for an investigation? Why did Larry Silverstein tell pbs that building #7 had been demolished when the government says that it collapsed do to the fire?
If Silverstein was telling the truth then when did the fdny put the explosives in the building? Did they really do it in a matter of a few hours? Impossible! Were explosives already in the building? Why were there such a huge amount of shortsellers taking puts on the two airlines involved in the crashes? Jp Morgan and other firms that were located in the wtc also had an abnormal amount of puts on their stock. If the people taking puts on these stocks didn't have foreknowledge then why didn't they collect on the puts?
What was up with the explosions in the basement and subway?
What are all the explosions everyone is talking about?
Why did so many of the firemen who make their living being present for fires and demolitions say all the buildings resembled controlled demolitions?
Originally posted by: [b]Sinsear[/b]
Originally posted by: Perry404
Originally posted by: Sinsear
Originally posted by: Perry404
If he doesn't win 2/5 first primaries I'll stop posting about Ron Paul because this nation will be finished.
Referenced from Why Ron Paul is going to Win New Hampshire
OH MY GOSH I WAS WRONG ABOUT SOMETHING!! :Q
You are one hell of a detective!!!
Now I should warn you there is a slight possibility that I may even be wrong again some day.
You've been wrong all along:
Originally posted by: Perry404
Well it has come right down to it. My understanding of the political world this week has been turned on its head. After many years of calling myself a conservative republican and voting to stay the course(although i did not support the war originally) i have finally succumbed to the conspiracy theorists and bought into their message. I have spent dozens of hours reviewing the evidence over the past 10 days and i am 90% certain from the science & evidence that i have seen that at the very least our government knew that the 9/11 attacks were going to take place.
I am now one of those crazies.
I started to look at the evidence because i couldn't help but notice just how many scholars around the country and the world have been screaming for a new investigation. I could not escape the evidence that the cia had been working with Pakistan?s isi who supported Al qaeda right up until 9/11. Why are hundreds of engineers from around the nation vehemently disagreeing that the collapse of these structure were do to fire?
Why was the steel, primarily the 47 center columns, immediately shipped out of the country and recycled(melted down) before a forensic analysis could be done? Wasn't Rudolf Giuliani a former federal prosecutor? Did he not know that it was a federal offense to interfere with a crime scene? Why didn't the federal government SCREAM bloody murder when the stuff was being hauled off?
Or did we just "already know" who attacked the towers so there was no need for an investigation? Why did Larry Silverstein tell pbs that building #7 had been demolished when the government says that it collapsed do to the fire?
If Silverstein was telling the truth then when did the fdny put the explosives in the building? Did they really do it in a matter of a few hours? Impossible! Were explosives already in the building? Why were there such a huge amount of shortsellers taking puts on the two airlines involved in the crashes? Jp Morgan and other firms that were located in the wtc also had an abnormal amount of puts on their stock. If the people taking puts on these stocks didn't have foreknowledge then why didn't they collect on the puts?
What was up with the explosions in the basement and subway?
What are all the explosions everyone is talking about?
Why did so many of the firemen who make their living being present for fires and demolitions say all the buildings resembled controlled demolitions?
Originally posted by: Perry404
Originally posted by: [b]Sinsear[/b]
Originally posted by: Perry404
Originally posted by: Sinsear
Originally posted by: Perry404
If he doesn't win 2/5 first primaries I'll stop posting about Ron Paul because this nation will be finished.
Referenced from Why Ron Paul is going to Win New Hampshire
OH MY GOSH I WAS WRONG ABOUT SOMETHING!! :Q
You are one hell of a detective!!!
Now I should warn you there is a slight possibility that I may even be wrong again some day.
You've been wrong all along:
Originally posted by: Perry404
Well it has come right down to it. My understanding of the political world this week has been turned on its head. After many years of calling myself a conservative republican and voting to stay the course(although i did not support the war originally) i have finally succumbed to the conspiracy theorists and bought into their message. I have spent dozens of hours reviewing the evidence over the past 10 days and i am 90% certain from the science & evidence that i have seen that at the very least our government knew that the 9/11 attacks were going to take place.
I am now one of those crazies.
I started to look at the evidence because i couldn't help but notice just how many scholars around the country and the world have been screaming for a new investigation. I could not escape the evidence that the cia had been working with Pakistan?s isi who supported Al qaeda right up until 9/11. Why are hundreds of engineers from around the nation vehemently disagreeing that the collapse of these structure were do to fire?
Why was the steel, primarily the 47 center columns, immediately shipped out of the country and recycled(melted down) before a forensic analysis could be done? Wasn't Rudolf Giuliani a former federal prosecutor? Did he not know that it was a federal offense to interfere with a crime scene? Why didn't the federal government SCREAM bloody murder when the stuff was being hauled off?
Or did we just "already know" who attacked the towers so there was no need for an investigation? Why did Larry Silverstein tell pbs that building #7 had been demolished when the government says that it collapsed do to the fire?
If Silverstein was telling the truth then when did the fdny put the explosives in the building? Did they really do it in a matter of a few hours? Impossible! Were explosives already in the building? Why were there such a huge amount of shortsellers taking puts on the two airlines involved in the crashes? Jp Morgan and other firms that were located in the wtc also had an abnormal amount of puts on their stock. If the people taking puts on these stocks didn't have foreknowledge then why didn't they collect on the puts?
What was up with the explosions in the basement and subway?
What are all the explosions everyone is talking about?
Why did so many of the firemen who make their living being present for fires and demolitions say all the buildings resembled controlled demolitions?
I appreciate you bringing that up as a bump is always nice especially on these issues. If you'd care to argue any of my points I would be happy to discuss it. By the way the human remains from 9/11 are still in a dump somewhere because the government didn't want to investigate and shipped everything off to garbage dumps and recycling centers. How do you feel about that?
Originally posted by: Sinsear
Originally posted by: Perry404
Originally posted by: [b]Sinsear[/b]
Originally posted by: Perry404
Originally posted by: Sinsear
Originally posted by: Perry404
If he doesn't win 2/5 first primaries I'll stop posting about Ron Paul because this nation will be finished.
Referenced from Why Ron Paul is going to Win New Hampshire
OH MY GOSH I WAS WRONG ABOUT SOMETHING!! :Q
You are one hell of a detective!!!
Now I should warn you there is a slight possibility that I may even be wrong again some day.
You've been wrong all along:
Originally posted by: Perry404
Well it has come right down to it. My understanding of the political world this week has been turned on its head. After many years of calling myself a conservative republican and voting to stay the course(although i did not support the war originally) i have finally succumbed to the conspiracy theorists and bought into their message. I have spent dozens of hours reviewing the evidence over the past 10 days and i am 90% certain from the science & evidence that i have seen that at the very least our government knew that the 9/11 attacks were going to take place.
I am now one of those crazies.
I started to look at the evidence because i couldn't help but notice just how many scholars around the country and the world have been screaming for a new investigation. I could not escape the evidence that the cia had been working with Pakistan?s isi who supported Al qaeda right up until 9/11. Why are hundreds of engineers from around the nation vehemently disagreeing that the collapse of these structure were do to fire?
Why was the steel, primarily the 47 center columns, immediately shipped out of the country and recycled(melted down) before a forensic analysis could be done? Wasn't Rudolf Giuliani a former federal prosecutor? Did he not know that it was a federal offense to interfere with a crime scene? Why didn't the federal government SCREAM bloody murder when the stuff was being hauled off?
Or did we just "already know" who attacked the towers so there was no need for an investigation? Why did Larry Silverstein tell pbs that building #7 had been demolished when the government says that it collapsed do to the fire?
If Silverstein was telling the truth then when did the fdny put the explosives in the building? Did they really do it in a matter of a few hours? Impossible! Were explosives already in the building? Why were there such a huge amount of shortsellers taking puts on the two airlines involved in the crashes? Jp Morgan and other firms that were located in the wtc also had an abnormal amount of puts on their stock. If the people taking puts on these stocks didn't have foreknowledge then why didn't they collect on the puts?
What was up with the explosions in the basement and subway?
What are all the explosions everyone is talking about?
Why did so many of the firemen who make their living being present for fires and demolitions say all the buildings resembled controlled demolitions?
I appreciate you bringing that up as a bump is always nice especially on these issues. If you'd care to argue any of my points I would be happy to discuss it. By the way the human remains from 9/11 are still in a dump somewhere because the government didn't want to investigate and shipped everything off to garbage dumps and recycling centers. How do you feel about that?
How do you feel that you are blaming one of the most tragic days in American history on the US Government and the people who work for it, instead of the scumsucking Islamic animals that planned and carried it out?
Originally posted by: Sinsear
How do you feel that you are blaming one of the most tragic days in American history on the US Government and the people who work for it, instead of the scumsucking Islamic animals that planned and carried it out?
QFTOriginally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: Sinsear
How do you feel that you are blaming one of the most tragic days in American history on the US Government and the people who work for it, instead of the scumsucking Islamic animals that planned and carried it out?
:roll:
Yes, the US is completely innocent. We've never done anything to provoke terrorists. :roll:
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: Sinsear
How do you feel that you are blaming one of the most tragic days in American history on the US Government and the people who work for it, instead of the scumsucking Islamic animals that planned and carried it out?
:roll:
Yes, the US is completely innocent. We've never done anything to provoke terrorists. :roll:
Originally posted by: Common Courtesy
and he came in behind McCain in NV when McCain did not even put any effort, yet Paul was pushing.Originally posted by: virginiakid
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Well, that would certainly explain the whopping 3% he received in Florida...Originally posted by: virginiakid
Ron Paul has been gaining popularity despite the media blackout on him.
Considering he didn't spend a dime in Florida and still was able to get over 60,000 votes, I say that was a true grassroots effort.
Originally posted by: Perry404
Tell me again how you believe that 90% of the American people have an understanding of monetary policy? Can you make a funny face when you say it?:laugh:
Originally posted by: Perry404
Originally posted by: Sinsear
Originally posted by: Perry404
Originally posted by: [b]Sinsear[/b]
Originally posted by: Perry404
Originally posted by: Sinsear
Originally posted by: Perry404
If he doesn't win 2/5 first primaries I'll stop posting about Ron Paul because this nation will be finished.
Referenced from Why Ron Paul is going to Win New Hampshire
OH MY GOSH I WAS WRONG ABOUT SOMETHING!! :Q
You are one hell of a detective!!!
Now I should warn you there is a slight possibility that I may even be wrong again some day.
You've been wrong all along:
Originally posted by: Perry404
Well it has come right down to it. My understanding of the political world this week has been turned on its head. After many years of calling myself a conservative republican and voting to stay the course(although i did not support the war originally) i have finally succumbed to the conspiracy theorists and bought into their message. I have spent dozens of hours reviewing the evidence over the past 10 days and i am 90% certain from the science & evidence that i have seen that at the very least our government knew that the 9/11 attacks were going to take place.
I am now one of those crazies.
I started to look at the evidence because i couldn't help but notice just how many scholars around the country and the world have been screaming for a new investigation. I could not escape the evidence that the cia had been working with Pakistan?s isi who supported Al qaeda right up until 9/11. Why are hundreds of engineers from around the nation vehemently disagreeing that the collapse of these structure were do to fire?
Why was the steel, primarily the 47 center columns, immediately shipped out of the country and recycled(melted down) before a forensic analysis could be done? Wasn't Rudolf Giuliani a former federal prosecutor? Did he not know that it was a federal offense to interfere with a crime scene? Why didn't the federal government SCREAM bloody murder when the stuff was being hauled off?
Or did we just "already know" who attacked the towers so there was no need for an investigation? Why did Larry Silverstein tell pbs that building #7 had been demolished when the government says that it collapsed do to the fire?
If Silverstein was telling the truth then when did the fdny put the explosives in the building? Did they really do it in a matter of a few hours? Impossible! Were explosives already in the building? Why were there such a huge amount of shortsellers taking puts on the two airlines involved in the crashes? Jp Morgan and other firms that were located in the wtc also had an abnormal amount of puts on their stock. If the people taking puts on these stocks didn't have foreknowledge then why didn't they collect on the puts?
What was up with the explosions in the basement and subway?
What are all the explosions everyone is talking about?
Why did so many of the firemen who make their living being present for fires and demolitions say all the buildings resembled controlled demolitions?
I appreciate you bringing that up as a bump is always nice especially on these issues. If you'd care to argue any of my points I would be happy to discuss it. By the way the human remains from 9/11 are still in a dump somewhere because the government didn't want to investigate and shipped everything off to garbage dumps and recycling centers. How do you feel about that?
How do you feel that you are blaming one of the most tragic days in American history on the US Government and the people who work for it, instead of the scumsucking Islamic animals that planned and carried it out?
I blame everyone involved. I don't know how much the governement knew because there has been no thorough investigation. Why do you think the families of those who died on 9/11 have been protesting all along. Ask them what they think. Most people don't blame the governement for Pearl Harbor yet most people know that some in the government knew it was going to happen ahead of time. It was a great way to get a nation of isolationists into WWII. 9/11 is no different.
Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
Originally posted by: Perry404
Tell me again how you believe that 90% of the American people have an understanding of monetary policy? Can you make a funny face when you say it?:laugh:
90% of people aren't going to be voting for Ron Paul. 99% of people who have any sort of understanding of economics won't be voting for Ron Paul either. You can cite those 25 or 30 economists who do support Ron Paul, but I can get you a list too long to be posted on Anandtech of PhD economists who think that he's an idiot. But, hey, Ron Paul knows better than everyone!
It's a sign of how dismal his campaign is when you create a thread talking about how less than half of one percent of the voting population turns up to a Ron Paul lovefest.
Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
Originally posted by: Perry404
Originally posted by: Sinsear
Originally posted by: Perry404
Originally posted by: [b]Sinsear[/b]
Originally posted by: Perry404
Originally posted by: Sinsear
Originally posted by: Perry404
If he doesn't win 2/5 first primaries I'll stop posting about Ron Paul because this nation will be finished.
Referenced from Why Ron Paul is going to Win New Hampshire
OH MY GOSH I WAS WRONG ABOUT SOMETHING!! :Q
You are one hell of a detective!!!
Now I should warn you there is a slight possibility that I may even be wrong again some day.
You've been wrong all along:
Originally posted by: Perry404
Well it has come right down to it. My understanding of the political world this week has been turned on its head. After many years of calling myself a conservative republican and voting to stay the course(although i did not support the war originally) i have finally succumbed to the conspiracy theorists and bought into their message. I have spent dozens of hours reviewing the evidence over the past 10 days and i am 90% certain from the science & evidence that i have seen that at the very least our government knew that the 9/11 attacks were going to take place.
I am now one of those crazies.
I started to look at the evidence because i couldn't help but notice just how many scholars around the country and the world have been screaming for a new investigation. I could not escape the evidence that the cia had been working with Pakistan?s isi who supported Al qaeda right up until 9/11. Why are hundreds of engineers from around the nation vehemently disagreeing that the collapse of these structure were do to fire?
Why was the steel, primarily the 47 center columns, immediately shipped out of the country and recycled(melted down) before a forensic analysis could be done? Wasn't Rudolf Giuliani a former federal prosecutor? Did he not know that it was a federal offense to interfere with a crime scene? Why didn't the federal government SCREAM bloody murder when the stuff was being hauled off?
Or did we just "already know" who attacked the towers so there was no need for an investigation? Why did Larry Silverstein tell pbs that building #7 had been demolished when the government says that it collapsed do to the fire?
If Silverstein was telling the truth then when did the fdny put the explosives in the building? Did they really do it in a matter of a few hours? Impossible! Were explosives already in the building? Why were there such a huge amount of shortsellers taking puts on the two airlines involved in the crashes? Jp Morgan and other firms that were located in the wtc also had an abnormal amount of puts on their stock. If the people taking puts on these stocks didn't have foreknowledge then why didn't they collect on the puts?
What was up with the explosions in the basement and subway?
What are all the explosions everyone is talking about?
Why did so many of the firemen who make their living being present for fires and demolitions say all the buildings resembled controlled demolitions?
I appreciate you bringing that up as a bump is always nice especially on these issues. If you'd care to argue any of my points I would be happy to discuss it. By the way the human remains from 9/11 are still in a dump somewhere because the government didn't want to investigate and shipped everything off to garbage dumps and recycling centers. How do you feel about that?
How do you feel that you are blaming one of the most tragic days in American history on the US Government and the people who work for it, instead of the scumsucking Islamic animals that planned and carried it out?
I blame everyone involved. I don't know how much the governement knew because there has been no thorough investigation. Why do you think the families of those who died on 9/11 have been protesting all along. Ask them what they think. Most people don't blame the governement for Pearl Harbor yet most people know that some in the government knew it was going to happen ahead of time. It was a great way to get a nation of isolationists into WWII. 9/11 is no different.
Pearl Harbor wasn't a government conspiracy. There is NO evidence to support this theory in the slightest. None. Not one bit. No shred. Nothing.
Please, stop embarrassing yourself.
Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
Originally posted by: Perry404
Tell me again how you believe that 90% of the American people have an understanding of monetary policy? Can you make a funny face when you say it?:laugh:
90% of people aren't going to be voting for Ron Paul. 99% of people who have any sort of understanding of economics won't be voting for Ron Paul either. You can cite those 25 or 30 economists who do support Ron Paul, but I can get you a list too long to be posted on Anandtech of PhD economists who think that he's an idiot. But, hey, Ron Paul knows better than everyone!
It's a sign of how dismal his campaign is when you create a thread talking about how less than half of one percent of the voting population turns up to a Ron Paul lovefest.
Originally posted by: Perry404
Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
Originally posted by: Perry404
Originally posted by: Sinsear
Originally posted by: Perry404
Originally posted by: [b]Sinsear[/b]
Originally posted by: Perry404
Originally posted by: Sinsear
Originally posted by: Perry404
If he doesn't win 2/5 first primaries I'll stop posting about Ron Paul because this nation will be finished.
Referenced from Why Ron Paul is going to Win New Hampshire
OH MY GOSH I WAS WRONG ABOUT SOMETHING!! :Q
You are one hell of a detective!!!
Now I should warn you there is a slight possibility that I may even be wrong again some day.
You've been wrong all along:
Originally posted by: Perry404
Well it has come right down to it. My understanding of the political world this week has been turned on its head. After many years of calling myself a conservative republican and voting to stay the course(although i did not support the war originally) i have finally succumbed to the conspiracy theorists and bought into their message. I have spent dozens of hours reviewing the evidence over the past 10 days and i am 90% certain from the science & evidence that i have seen that at the very least our government knew that the 9/11 attacks were going to take place.
I am now one of those crazies.
I started to look at the evidence because i couldn't help but notice just how many scholars around the country and the world have been screaming for a new investigation. I could not escape the evidence that the cia had been working with Pakistan?s isi who supported Al qaeda right up until 9/11. Why are hundreds of engineers from around the nation vehemently disagreeing that the collapse of these structure were do to fire?
Why was the steel, primarily the 47 center columns, immediately shipped out of the country and recycled(melted down) before a forensic analysis could be done? Wasn't Rudolf Giuliani a former federal prosecutor? Did he not know that it was a federal offense to interfere with a crime scene? Why didn't the federal government SCREAM bloody murder when the stuff was being hauled off?
Or did we just "already know" who attacked the towers so there was no need for an investigation? Why did Larry Silverstein tell pbs that building #7 had been demolished when the government says that it collapsed do to the fire?
If Silverstein was telling the truth then when did the fdny put the explosives in the building? Did they really do it in a matter of a few hours? Impossible! Were explosives already in the building? Why were there such a huge amount of shortsellers taking puts on the two airlines involved in the crashes? Jp Morgan and other firms that were located in the wtc also had an abnormal amount of puts on their stock. If the people taking puts on these stocks didn't have foreknowledge then why didn't they collect on the puts?
What was up with the explosions in the basement and subway?
What are all the explosions everyone is talking about?
Why did so many of the firemen who make their living being present for fires and demolitions say all the buildings resembled controlled demolitions?
I appreciate you bringing that up as a bump is always nice especially on these issues. If you'd care to argue any of my points I would be happy to discuss it. By the way the human remains from 9/11 are still in a dump somewhere because the government didn't want to investigate and shipped everything off to garbage dumps and recycling centers. How do you feel about that?
How do you feel that you are blaming one of the most tragic days in American history on the US Government and the people who work for it, instead of the scumsucking Islamic animals that planned and carried it out?
I blame everyone involved. I don't know how much the governement knew because there has been no thorough investigation. Why do you think the families of those who died on 9/11 have been protesting all along. Ask them what they think. Most people don't blame the governement for Pearl Harbor yet most people know that some in the government knew it was going to happen ahead of time. It was a great way to get a nation of isolationists into WWII. 9/11 is no different.
Pearl Harbor wasn't a government conspiracy. There is NO evidence to support this theory in the slightest. None. Not one bit. No shred. Nothing.
Please, stop embarrassing yourself.
I never said it was a government conspiracy. Go back and read my post again. If you're not going to bother to learn to read than don't post.
Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
Originally posted by: Perry404
Tell me again how you believe that 90% of the American people have an understanding of monetary policy? Can you make a funny face when you say it?:laugh:
90% of people aren't going to be voting for Ron Paul. 99% of people who have any sort of understanding of economics won't be voting for Ron Paul either. You can cite those 25 or 30 economists who do support Ron Paul, but I can get you a list too long to be posted on Anandtech of PhD economists who think that he's an idiot. But, hey, Ron Paul knows better than everyone!
It's a sign of how dismal his campaign is when you create a thread talking about how less than half of one percent of the voting population turns up to a Ron Paul lovefest.
You have no idea what you are talking about. The financial community supports Ron Paul in a big way. Do your research before you go blabbing off on subjects you know little about. Once again this is an absolutely false statement from someone that doesn't do their due diligence when it comes to the most basic facts. You're either like an ostrich hiding his head in the sand or someone in a huge state of denial although I am not sure which.
Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
Most basic facts? Find me the evidence that the financial community supports Ron Paul in a "big way" and quoting Mises or those 35 people listed in wikipedia doesn't count. you have to remember that the burden of proof rests with you here. The Federal Reserve has overseen the US economy go from nothing, to the world's largest. They've overseen the single longest period of economic expansion in our country's history. Why, again, is this endeavor worth abandoning? Start providing real evidence (no geocities links) and prove to me that credited economists are supporting Ron's idiocy in a "big way."
You're right, you didn't say it was a government conspiracy, but I'd love to see evidence that everybody knew the attack was coming on December 7. Do you even know how the attack unfolded that day or why the attack was so successful? Have you done any research into this or did your relatives just tell you that, after the fact, they "knew" those no good japs were up to something?
Originally posted by: Perry404
Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
Most basic facts? Find me the evidence that the financial community supports Ron Paul in a "big way" and quoting Mises or those 35 people listed in wikipedia doesn't count. you have to remember that the burden of proof rests with you here. The Federal Reserve has overseen the US economy go from nothing, to the world's largest. They've overseen the single longest period of economic expansion in our country's history. Why, again, is this endeavor worth abandoning? Start providing real evidence (no geocities links) and prove to me that credited economists are supporting Ron's idiocy in a "big way."
You want me to do your homework for you? Sorry. If you want to continue believing that Paul has little or no support than you are free to be ignorant. I'll tell you what I'll help you out just a tiny bit with one link so you don't go on believing that mad monies Jim Cramer is the only financial professional to support Paul.
http://alienson.wordpress.com/...in-financial-disaster/
You're right, you didn't say it was a government conspiracy, but I'd love to see evidence that everybody knew the attack was coming on December 7. Do you even know how the attack unfolded that day or why the attack was so successful? Have you done any research into this or did your relatives just tell you that, after the fact, they "knew" those no good japs were up to something?
Once again you need to go back and read my post. I didn't say everyone knew I said some people.
Really people this is getting ridiculous. I spend more time correcting your mistakes than I do debating you.
Get your basic facts correct FIRST and THEN we can have an intelligent debate.
Just need the first minuteI think this is where most (sane) people would direct you to the nearest roll of Reynalds Wrap. However, new evidence has come forth that leave me wondering if there really is any help for people like you.
He wants to spend less than we take in and pay down the national debt. AND, he tells you how he`ll cut spending.99% of people who have any sort of understanding of economics won't be voting for Ron Paul either.
Originally posted by: Perry404
I don't doubt it as they are both nationally known. As far as excitement goes however you can't touch Ron Paul. Just no contest.
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: Perry404
I don't doubt it as they are both nationally known. As far as excitement goes however you can't touch Ron Paul. Just no contest.
Perry, didn't I tell you to take a break? :laugh:
I'm still waiting for you to return to those New Hampshire threads and admit Paul's huge defeat and rather pathetic showing in a state where he should have won.
The fact of the matter is that Paul is, and will remain forever, an internet phenomenon. I like most of his message, but he gets way too extreme. And his spamm...er, followers are the most repulsive group of people.