Ron Paul Shock Newsletters Unearthed

[techs]

If one were to judge Ron Paul solely on the people who have been supporting him in this forum, than I would believe anything anyone says about him.
After all, his supporters are living in a fantasy land. I can only assume thier candidate is too.

 

[lozina]

Originally posted by: TheSnowman
Old news.

/thread

/Pabster's credibility

 

[bamacre]

Originally posted by: techs
If one were to judge Ron Paul solely on the people who have been supporting him in this forum, than I would believe anything anyone says about him.
After all, his supporters are living in a fantasy land. I can only assume thier candidate is too.

This from a man who thinks the Federal Government will solve our health care problems.

 

[shiner]

Originally posted by: techs
If one were to judge Ron Paul solely on the people who have been supporting him in this forum, than I would believe anything anyone says about him.
After all, his supporters are living in a fantasy land. I can only assume thier candidate is too.

Yeah..you're 100% correct. I mean after all the man wasn't even smart enough to have the FBI put together dossiers on all his potential obstacles to the White House.

 

[bamacre]

Originally posted by: lozina

/Pabster's credibility

Welcome to 2001.

 

[JEDIYoda]

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon

Originally posted by: Pabster

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
LOL if you believe this, I'll hand out the tin foil hats for you guys :laugh:

Can you refute it?

Can you prove it? Find proof other than some nutjobs site looking to gain hits. How about a document? You know the thing they call proof? How much of the words (if true) were taken out of context? There is a heavy bias in the "editorial" if you can even call this wackjob that.

Is that the best you can do to refute this article???

This article is supported by Ron whats his names own documents....hmmm

 

[JEDIYoda]

Originally posted by: lozina

Originally posted by: Pabster

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
LOL if you believe this, I'll hand out the tin foil hats for you guys :laugh:

Can you refute it?

You're the accuser. The burden of proof is on you. That's the way it works.

As far as I'm concerned, this stuff could all be fabricated by crafty minds of the Rudy Guiliani campaign until it can be proved Mr. Ron Paul himself has written these documents.

I can just as easily get the typewriter from my attic and write out some really damning texts and then type "by Rudy Guliani" or whatever at the end, and then scan it and send the pictures to the media,

Not even We-hate-Ron-Paul FOX NEWS has this story

So the rabid supporters of Ron whats his name cannot refute this article using Ronnie`s very own documents???



Interesting.....hehehe

 

[lozina]

Originally posted by: JEDIYoda

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon

Originally posted by: Pabster

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
LOL if you believe this, I'll hand out the tin foil hats for you guys :laugh:

Can you refute it?

Can you prove it? Find proof other than some nutjobs site looking to gain hits. How about a document? You know the thing they call proof? How much of the words (if true) were taken out of context? There is a heavy bias in the "editorial" if you can even call this wackjob that.

Is that the best you can do to refute this article???

This article is supported by Ron whats his names own documents....hmmm

/JEDIYoda's credibility

 

[JEDIYoda]

Originally posted by: lozina

Originally posted by: JEDIYoda

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon

Originally posted by: Pabster

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
LOL if you believe this, I'll hand out the tin foil hats for you guys :laugh:

Can you refute it?

Can you prove it? Find proof other than some nutjobs site looking to gain hits. How about a document? You know the thing they call proof? How much of the words (if true) were taken out of context? There is a heavy bias in the "editorial" if you can even call this wackjob that.

Is that the best you can do to refute this article???

This article is supported by Ron whats his names own documents....hmmm

/JEDIYoda's credibility

Now instead of attacking the article using facts and other articles you attack me.......hmmmmmm
Possibly because the article is true and there is nothing to say except for to turn tail and run.
That`s an interesting spin...one of many I am sure I will find as I read down the thread and comments on all of them!!

 

[SSSnail]

I just farted in your general direction, prove that.

 

[NoStateofMind]

Originally posted by: JEDIYoda

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon

Originally posted by: Pabster

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
LOL if you believe this, I'll hand out the tin foil hats for you guys :laugh:

Can you refute it?

Can you prove it? Find proof other than some nutjobs site looking to gain hits. How about a document? You know the thing they call proof? How much of the words (if true) were taken out of context? There is a heavy bias in the "editorial" if you can even call this wackjob that.

Is that the best you can do to refute this article???

This article is supported by Ron whats his names own documents....hmmm

Maybe if you did some research instead of leaching on to some nutjobs obvious lies and smear, you might have some intellectual credibility.

 

[JEDIYoda]

Originally posted by: bamacre
:laugh:

I smell fear.

This is kinda funny because the next money bomb for Paul is in celebration of MLK Jr.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AeBKhWHJFgE

Paul has spoke many times about the idea of Civil Disobedience, and Gandhi and MLK. And also, Paul and MLK Jr. have the same ideas about the USA and policing the world...

http://www.americanrhetoric.co...timetobreaksilence.htm

I totally agree!! I also smell FEAR among the Ron whats his name supporters.
FEAR of the truth!!

Peace!!

 

[NoStateofMind]

Originally posted by: JEDIYoda

Originally posted by: lozina

Originally posted by: JEDIYoda

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon

Originally posted by: Pabster

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
LOL if you believe this, I'll hand out the tin foil hats for you guys :laugh:

Can you refute it?

Can you prove it? Find proof other than some nutjobs site looking to gain hits. How about a document? You know the thing they call proof? How much of the words (if true) were taken out of context? There is a heavy bias in the "editorial" if you can even call this wackjob that.

Is that the best you can do to refute this article???

This article is supported by Ron whats his names own documents....hmmm

/JEDIYoda's credibility

Now instead of attacking the article using facts and other articles you attack me.......hmmmmmm
Possibly because the article is true and there is nothing to say except for to turn tail and run.
That`s an interesting spin...one of many I am sure I will find as I read down the thread and comments on all of them!!

The burden of proof is on the ones making these claims. So get to it, prove it. Otherwise STFU. Are you foolish enough to believe everything on the internet?

 

[lozina]

Originally posted by: JEDIYoda

Originally posted by: lozina

Originally posted by: JEDIYoda

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon

Originally posted by: Pabster

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
LOL if you believe this, I'll hand out the tin foil hats for you guys :laugh:

Can you refute it?

Can you prove it? Find proof other than some nutjobs site looking to gain hits. How about a document? You know the thing they call proof? How much of the words (if true) were taken out of context? There is a heavy bias in the "editorial" if you can even call this wackjob that.

Is that the best you can do to refute this article???

This article is supported by Ron whats his names own documents....hmmm

/JEDIYoda's credibility

Now instead of attacking the message you attack me.......hmmmmmm
That`s an interesting spin...one of many I am sure I will find as I read down the thread and comments on all of them!!

(Enter Stage Right: The Victim Card)

The Victim Card: Oh teh noes! You are making a personal attack!

(The Victim Card picks up the phone and calls the Wahhhbulance)


Any bets on when JEDIYoda is finally going to realize this thing has been debunked ? Anyone?

 

[NoStateofMind]

Originally posted by: JEDIYoda

Originally posted by: bamacre
:laugh:

I smell fear.

This is kinda funny because the next money bomb for Paul is in celebration of MLK Jr.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AeBKhWHJFgE

Paul has spoke many times about the idea of Civil Disobedience, and Gandhi and MLK. And also, Paul and MLK Jr. have the same ideas about the USA and policing the world...

http://www.americanrhetoric.co...timetobreaksilence.htm

I totally agree!! I also smell FEAR among the Ron whats his name supporters.
FEAR of the truth!!

Peace!!

Spin, cut & run tactics FTW.

 

[SSSnail]

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon

Originally posted by: JEDIYoda

Originally posted by: lozina

Originally posted by: JEDIYoda

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon

Originally posted by: Pabster

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
LOL if you believe this, I'll hand out the tin foil hats for you guys :laugh:

Can you refute it?

Can you prove it? Find proof other than some nutjobs site looking to gain hits. How about a document? You know the thing they call proof? How much of the words (if true) were taken out of context? There is a heavy bias in the "editorial" if you can even call this wackjob that.

Is that the best you can do to refute this article???

This article is supported by Ron whats his names own documents....hmmm

/JEDIYoda's credibility

Now instead of attacking the article using facts and other articles you attack me.......hmmmmmm
Possibly because the article is true and there is nothing to say except for to turn tail and run.
That`s an interesting spin...one of many I am sure I will find as I read down the thread and comments on all of them!!

The burden of proof is on the ones making these claims. So get to it, prove it. Otherwise STFU. Are you foolish enough to believe everything on the internet?

He's only foolish enough to believe whatever fits his agenda, from the internet of course.

 

[JEDIYoda]

Originally posted by: lozina

Originally posted by: Pabster
This is a troll thread.

You ought to know better.

Thats a funny statement!
If you people had your way anything said that was factual or not that is against your beloved Ron whats his name would be considered a troll thread!!

 

[JEDIYoda]

Originally posted by: Thump553
Although the chances of me ever voting for him are slim to none (in large part to his federal reserve views), I find Ron Paul to be a refreshing and invigorating candidate who has done much to inject actual substance into the national political debate. If I'm channeel surfing and run across an interview of him, I'll nearly always stop to listen.

If the views expressed in Pabster's thumbnail were in fact expressed by Ron Paul I'll feel greatly disappointed, even soiled. OTOH, given the tendency to perpetuate dirty tricks in politics (especially in the Republican arena) I'll withhold any judgment for now.

Finally somebody else with an open mind!!

 

[JEDIYoda]

Originally posted by: bamacre
It wasn't Paul's idea to go into Iraq and kill hundreds of thousands of brown people.

That idea was Bush's. And Paul voted against it.

Nice try to derailing this thread.
I am totally amazed that so far the best you Ron whats his name people can do to refute this very factual article is belittle those who have open minds and are not brain washed by a particular candidate!

 

[JEDIYoda]

Originally posted by: azazyel

Originally posted by: Pabster

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Can you prove it? Find proof other than some nutjobs site looking to gain hits. How about a document? You know the thing they call proof? How much of the words (if true) were taken out of context? There is a heavy bias in the "editorial" if you can even call this wackjob that.

Why don't you take a look at my "Cliffs" link. Each and every racist quote is cited and sourced from Paul's own documents, with links.

There were hardly any links and the ones that were there went to photobucket

Thats the best you can do......to stand up for Ron whats his name??? hmmm

 

[yowolabi]

Originally posted by: lozina

Originally posted by: TheSnowman
Old news.

/thread

/Pabster's credibility

There goes my need to furnish links. Well, here's one anyway....

http://www.chron.com/CDA/archi...ve.mpl?id=1996_1343749

I'm confused why any of this goes against Pabster, though.

Your link provides proof that the newsletters exist, that they were published Ron Paul's name all over them. Ron Paul hmself acknowledged those facts. That's exactly what the article that Pabster copied said. Your article goes on to day that Ron Paul claims that he didn't write them himself, but that they were written by a staffer, and he disagrees with it. All that is also said in the article that Pabster quoted.

So it seems that you've proven that the article that Pabster quoted is correct, and have not posted one thing that disagrees with what is said.

Where exactly was Pabster's credibility hurt in this?

 

[JEDIYoda]

Originally posted by: lozina

Originally posted by: Pabster

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
LOL if you believe this, I'll hand out the tin foil hats for you guys :laugh:

Can you refute it?

You're the accuser. The burden of proof is on you. That's the way it works.

As far as I'm concerned, this stuff could all be fabricated by crafty minds of the Rudy Guiliani campaign until it can be proved Mr. Ron Paul himself has written these documents.

I can just as easily get the typewriter from my attic and write out some really damning texts and then type "by Rudy Guliani" or whatever at the end, and then scan it and send the pictures to the media,

Not even We-hate-Ron-Paul FOX NEWS has this story

He has met the burden of proof using the article.
Never have I heard more rediculous responses by Ron whats his name supporters.
Since when have the rules changed?
So anybody now who posts and article that stands on its own merits has to also post a 2nd article supporting the first?
hmmm

 

[JEDIYoda]

Originally posted by: HomerJS
I don't believe it for a minute...

I would`nt believe it just for a minute iether..maybe more like an hour..a day...a week.......etc....

 

[JEDIYoda]

Originally posted by: bamacre

Originally posted by: lozina

/Pabster's credibility

Welcome to 2001.

Ron whats his names credility just went down the toilet...lol

 

[NoStateofMind]

Originally posted by: JEDIYoda

Originally posted by: azazyel

Originally posted by: Pabster

Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Can you prove it? Find proof other than some nutjobs site looking to gain hits. How about a document? You know the thing they call proof? How much of the words (if true) were taken out of context? There is a heavy bias in the "editorial" if you can even call this wackjob that.

Why don't you take a look at my "Cliffs" link. Each and every racist quote is cited and sourced from Paul's own documents, with links.

There were hardly any links and the ones that were there went to photobucket

Thats the best you can do......to stand up for Ron whats his name??? hmmm

I'm sorry I can't hold back anymore. Jediyoda, you are now a complete and utter idiot. There are no "facts" as you say, only spin in which you have been deluded into believing. In some ways, I really for sorry for you, for your weak mindedness, controlled by loons, fearmongers and warmongers. I hope you will wake up at some point and realize your delusion so you can make an effort at recovery. Good luck.