Ron Paul Shock Newsletters Unearthed

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

NoStateofMind

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2005
9,711
6
76
Originally posted by: compuwiz1
Well, now this stuff is on CNN Some of it must be true. :shocked:

No one debates it wasn't printed on a newsletter. What is being debated is whether or not he had a hand in it. This has already been explained yet some fascist shills refuse to listen and insist this BS was "accepted" by Paul. This is nothing more than an attempt to take a poke at Ron. None of his voting record nor video or audio could back up these claims. Find those pieces of evidence then you would have gold. Unfortunately, you have the same chance of finding a dodo bird. Happy hunting!
 

palehorse

Lifer
Dec 21, 2005
11,521
0
76
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Originally posted by: compuwiz1
Well, now this stuff is on CNN Some of it must be true. :shocked:

No one debates it wasn't printed on a newsletter. What is being debated is whether or not he had a hand in it. This has already been explained yet some fascist shills refuse to listen and insist this BS was "accepted" by Paul. This is nothing more than an attempt to take a poke at Ron. None of his voting record nor video or audio could back up these claims. Find those pieces of evidence then you would have gold. Unfortunately, you have the same chance of finding a dodo bird. Happy hunting!
Did Paul ever sue any of the "other authors"? just wondering...
 

joshw10

Senior member
Feb 16, 2004
806
0
0
This is now the #1 story on CNN.com, wow! He got little recognition for raising $6 million in a day entirely from small individual contributions, beating or nearly beating the all-day 1 day record set by Hillary. Now some racist allegations and suddenly they want to pay attention....

I support Ron Paul's message but I can't say I buy his explanation any more than I buy Roger Clemen's denial of steroid use

The cynic in me says this could actually give Paul a bump in South Carolina. Die hard Paul supports + racist vote > the 7-8% he's been getting.
 

Saint Michael

Golden Member
Aug 4, 2007
1,878
1
0
"Order was only restored in L.A. when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks three days after rioting began,"

Haha! I'm more likely to vote for him now, that's pretty good.
 

mrCide

Diamond Member
Nov 27, 1999
6,187
0
76
This is pathetic.. I'm shocked that CNN and other people are even responding to this allegation.
 

Nitemare

Lifer
Feb 8, 2001
35,466
4
76
Originally posted by: mrCide
This is pathetic.. I'm shocked that CNN and other people are even responding to this allegation.

CNN is running it on the front page
 

mrCide

Diamond Member
Nov 27, 1999
6,187
0
76
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: mrCide
This is pathetic.. I'm shocked that CNN and other people are even responding to this allegation.

CNN is running it on the front page

Yeah, that's what made me come back to this post. Funny how earlier today it was a blip on CNN, musta got a billion hits, and now it's a HUGE issue. I like Ron Paul, I'd vote for him, but I"m no fanatic by any means.. this is just sad.
 

Pliablemoose

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
25,195
0
56
Did everyone forget that that's why the riots stopped?

I remember the shots from a chopper with people lined up at the post office to pick up their checks...

It was a massive line & the post offices had been closed...
 

NoStateofMind

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2005
9,711
6
76
Originally posted by: Pabster
Well, I'm vindicated guys. CNN even ran a story on it. :laugh:

Originally posted by:CitizenKain
Yea, votes just bounce off him.

:laugh: :thumbsup: :laugh:

Keep looking for ways to discredit him. Haven't done it yet. Over 20+ years of honesty and integrity, no other politician can match
 

AndrewR

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
11,157
0
0
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Originally posted by: Pabster
Well, I'm vindicated guys. CNN even ran a story on it. :laugh:

Originally posted by:CitizenKain
Yea, votes just bounce off him.

:laugh: :thumbsup: :laugh:

Keep looking for ways to discredit him. Haven't done it yet. Over 20+ years of honesty and integrity, no other politician can match

Two or three New Hampshire voters agreed! :thumbsup:
 

dualsmp

Golden Member
Aug 16, 2003
1,626
44
91
I'm guessing they are trying to dissuade the undecided crowd with this malarkey. Do a little research and you'll find Paul has the most conservative voting record of anyone. In fact Paul is so conservative he makes Barry Goldwater look like a liberal in comparison.
 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,726
2,501
126
Originally posted by: SleepWalkerX
Ron Paul's response on CNN:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=G7FwULXnM_E

Wow, these neocons are just trying to scoop up some dirt on Paul, but what sucks for them is that Ron Paul is a man of integrity unlike the rest of the GOP nominees.

I listened to this five minute+ video and frankly, and totally unconvinced at Paul's denial. He claims he didn't write those editorials and doesn't know who did (and won't bother to try to find out). He denies being a racist.

Frankly, Paul's response is hogwash. These comments were published in newsletters under Paul's name and sanctioned by him. It is not a matter of one or two isolated incidents-it is years of racist vitrole. The fact that Ron Paul permitted these things to be repeatedly published under his name-to his probable political benefit-is abhorent.

I don't see how you draw the conclusion that his response shows he is a man of integrity-I draw exactly the opposite conclusion.

 

NoStateofMind

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2005
9,711
6
76
Originally posted by: Thump553
Originally posted by: SleepWalkerX
Ron Paul's response on CNN:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=G7FwULXnM_E

Wow, these neocons are just trying to scoop up some dirt on Paul, but what sucks for them is that Ron Paul is a man of integrity unlike the rest of the GOP nominees.

I listened to this five minute+ video and frankly, and totally unconvinced at Paul's denial. He claims he didn't write those editorials and doesn't know who did (and won't bother to try to find out). He denies being a racist.

Frankly, Paul's response is hogwash. These comments were published in newsletters under Paul's name and sanctioned by him. It is not a matter of one or two isolated incidents-it is years of racist vitrole. The fact that Ron Paul permitted these things to be repeatedly published under his name-to his probable political benefit-is abhorent.

I don't see how you draw the conclusion that his response shows he is a man of integrity-I draw exactly the opposite conclusion.

The fact is no one around him, in congress, at his home state or in texas has heard Ron Paul verbally say or visually seen say anything remotely close to these letters. You cannot take these letters at face value, you have to research the man. His voting record over the last 20+ years (consistency), married for over 53 years (loyal), returns his salary from congress (honorable), these things together show integrity. NO OTHER candidate has this type of record, NONE. What he speaks he actually practices, unlike ANY OTHER. But somehow, these letters that Ron Paul has vehemently denied knowledge of, you call him a liar? Point out in his lifetime where he has made any racial slur other than these letters and you would have a case. You simply cannot. You must research this mans history, his principles, his honesty, his loyalty, then maybe you can comment on this mans integrity!

/thread
 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,982
3,318
126
since hardly anybody has ever heard of Ron whats his name...how can you possibly expect people to comment on the integrity of a fly by night presidential candidate???
 

NoStateofMind

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2005
9,711
6
76
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
since hardly anybody has ever heard of Ron whats his name...how can you possibly expect people to comment on the integrity of a fly by night presidential candidate???

Are you too stupid to type Ron Paul in Google? How about Wikipedia?

Do you ever get tired of spamming?
 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,987
1
0
Originally posted by: Thump553
I listened to this five minute+ video and frankly, and totally unconvinced at Paul's denial. He claims he didn't write those editorials and doesn't know who did (and won't bother to try to find out). He denies being a racist.

Frankly, Paul's response is hogwash. These comments were published in newsletters under Paul's name and sanctioned by him. It is not a matter of one or two isolated incidents-it is years of racist vitrole. The fact that Ron Paul permitted these things to be repeatedly published under his name-to his probable political benefit-is abhorent.

I don't see how you draw the conclusion that his response shows he is a man of integrity-I draw exactly the opposite conclusion.

Awaiting Paulbot Spin :laugh:

 

HeXploiT

Diamond Member
Jun 11, 2004
4,359
1
76
It's all true. Ron Paul and these people formed a secret organization to keep aqua-green shaded people from joining their special club house. Ican see Ron and David Duke walking arm in arm now.

Now why does Ron Paul want to kill of the war on drugs?

This is all total bs. I will say that once. Anyone who buys into this garbage is either an idiot or a liar. The man has Fanatical Mexicans, blacks, pols, Jews and Arabs following him everywhere because they love him. Ask those people and the hundreds of Mexican mothers who's babies he's delivered if he's a racist.

Liars is what you are. You should be ashamed of yourself.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |