Oh yeah. Mostly Russians (25 so far) that Mueller has no jurisdiction over. Not only that, he couldn't prove a case against them in a month of Sundays. Or, in the context of this thread, Modays.
What would Mueller do when the attorneys for these guys ask to see the DNC servers they are alleged to have hacked? Sorry no got, probably won't fly.
Podesta clicked on a phishing email and the DNC didn't take the appropriate steps to secure their servers*. These two are at the root of all that has transpired since. Democrats, who cannot admit that they made mistakes also lost an election and in the spirit of acting like the adolescents that they are, somebody has got to pay.
This thread is based in anxiety over a DOJ employee that has been obstructing investigations by withholding evidence for over a year. He has been warned a number of times that his behavior is not acceptable and he has thumbed his nose at Congress every single time. If you defend Rosenstein's actions, you make it very clear that the obstruction is something you favor. Color me not surprised.
The cold war is alive. There will be a winner.
*This is an assumption and one made by Mueller too. The DNC decided they were not going to turn over their server(s) to the FBI. The FBI said OK, so we'll never really know. If the FBI came through your door after your computers how long do you think they'd still be in your possession? Collusion and obstruction. Good for me but not for thee.
Give me a fucking break.