Cracks me up how they won’t give up on the text messages but completely IGNORE the stuff fellow Republicans said about Trump.
Just in, Trump says the press is the enemy of the people again. What person with integrity doesn't view Trump with contempt? This whole "bias" thing is hilariously inane.
That's an outright lie. That you even attempt to sell it as fact is outlandish.The man sent emails to his girlfriend professing his admiration of Hillary and hatred of Trump. That's fact, it's undisputed by the guy that wrote it. It's in the emails retained by the FBI, it's in the IG report, and in the congressional record.
Honestly, we have no more reason to interact. You've taken an absurd position that's indefensible, then call me ignorant for not accepting your lies as fact.
Quite the American patriots we have over here! We've got one guy that doesn't like someone who is in charge of another guy investigating an attack on this country because he looks like a "sneaky little weasel".
Then we've got another guy who couldn't give two shits that an investigation has returned the actual identities and brought charges against those who attacked us. Meanwhile, his partisan bubble is so fortified, he completely ignores the charges against Americans who have connections to those that attached us while also ignoring that the investigation is still ongoing and still being productive.
These are also the same two twats chanting "lock get up", after multiple years of investigations with ZERO to show for it.
That's what cult members looks like, folks.
I have.First:
Well who Rosenstein is in charge of has Nothing to do with how I feel about him.
Second:
You have never seen me say "lock her up" or "lock get up".
I have.
130 charges so far on 32 people. Lots of witches out there.
Notice how the President hasn’t congratulated the FBI on doing a good job, wonder why?
Yeah, he’s really for law & order.
We're all biased to some degree, it's part of being human, there is nothing imaginary about it.
My only point with the email investigation was that the fellow was a hard core Hillary supporter and shouldn't have been on that case. Just as he shouldn't have been part of the Trump investigation, an opinion born out by his removal from the case.
People aren't robots, our emotions and opinions color our perception, that's why we have the concept of a professional distance. Once you reject that concept, how can there not be some bias?
Reverse it for a moment, if the fellow had professed his undying admiration for Trump, would you want him on the case? Would you accept that he did his level best, that he didn't overlook some minor piece of information that would turn out to have importance? How would that be exposed in a review of the case or the methods used in the investigation? The reality is that we end up with two questions, do we trust the investigator? Is his integrity beyond reproach? That he didn't announce his admiration for Hillary at the outset brings that integrity into question. That he used his FBI provided phone to text the woman he was having an affair with, points to questionable judgement. His actions, though they might very well be absolutely honest and forthright, cast a taint on his integrity, and that is where my bias comes from.
These are outright false statements. Get your facts straight asshole.That's an outright lie. That you even attempt to sell it as fact is outlandish.The man sent emails to his girlfriend professing his admiration of Hillary and hatred of Trump. That's fact, it's undisputed by the guy that wrote it. It's in the emails retained by the FBI, it's in the IG report, and in the congressional record.
Honestly, we have no more reason to interact. You've taken an absurd position that's indefensible, then call me ignorant for not accepting your lies as fact.
Iirc, he was a Kasich supporter.These are outright false statements. Get your facts straight asshole.
That's an outright lie. That you even attempt to sell it as fact is outlandish.The man sent emails to his girlfriend professing his admiration of Hillary and hatred of Trump. That's fact, it's undisputed by the guy that wrote it. It's in the emails retained by the FBI, it's in the IG report, and in the congressional record.
Honestly, we have no more reason to interact. You've taken an absurd position that's indefensible, then call me ignorant for not accepting your lies as fact.
I don't even know if that is confirmed. He said a coworker guessed he would vote for Kasich. Maybe though, I just found this exchange:Iirc, he was a Kasich supporter.
Strzok – Ok I may vote for Trump.
Page – What? Poor Kasich. He’s the only sensible man up there.
Strzok – He was pretty much calling for death for Snowden. I’m a single-issue voter. Espionage Machine Party
Strzok - Exacty re Kasich. And he has ZERO appeal
That's an outright lie. That you even attempt to sell it as fact is outlandish.The man sent emails to his girlfriend professing his admiration of Hillary and hatred of Trump. That's fact, it's undisputed by the guy that wrote it. It's in the emails retained by the FBI, it's in the IG report, and in the congressional record.
Honestly, we have no more reason to interact. You've taken an absurd position that's indefensible, then call me ignorant for not accepting your lies as fact.
So, when do the subpoenas for these peoples' communications go out so we can see what bias they had with regards to Strozk? After all we can't have them doing any sort of investigation until we can 100% confirm they had no bias.
Nope. They're only anarchists when it's about them and their team. For everyone else, they're vicious authoritarians. Either way, they have no actual respect for the rule of law, as they firmly believe the law should be unequally applied depending on partisan allegiance.Holy crap it just came to me, I know I can be slow on the uptake but I am catching on, I always get there in the end... There it is. You guys are full blown anarchists!
..Just in, Trump says the press is the enemy of the people again. What person with integrity doesn't view Trump with contempt? This whole "bias" thing is hilariously inane.
1. Strzok has an opinion about trump, like everybody else, and opinions about trump is rather binary in nature.
2. Strzok was an absolutly an Idiot of gigantic proportions to use his work devices for this communication. (easy way to hide the affair, cause phone==topsecret?) But not for the communication it self.
3. Due to how this communication may be perceived and used as a partisan sledgehammer he should be removed at once (he was?)?
4. Girlfriend. There is a relationship between love and insanity, those upstairs chemicals might have pushed his reasoning skills over the edge.
You cant throw away the investigation cause of a fool with an opinion, but you can hold said fool to the standard he was supposed to uphold.
edit : it is like Weiners dick picks just before the election .. What a gigantic moron. Asshat. Idiot. Fucktard. Retard amongst retards. Sigh. Keep your fucking nose clean and dick in pants ffs.
Gawd. Both similar & contrary opinions were likely expressed on thousands of work phones across multiple federal law enforcement agencies. Strzok was removed from the Mueller investigation to remove any hint of impropriety six weeks in, a year ago. His previous work in no way acted to defeat the Trump campaign or Russian support of Trump, either, but the GOP can paint any act as nefarious.
Poor Donald! So much bias! So persecuted! Deep State conspiracy! Can't trust the FBI!
Given the reality-shit-show turn society has taken I think its proper for the adults in the room to step up the clean act. Work phone/devices for work related matters only.
It IS going to catch up to everyone sooner or later, most likely sooner, cause in a few years it wont take millions of man hours to scrutinize the entire communication mass back and forth of the FBI or whatever, it will be at a click of a button and an AI will traverse all that shit for you and present you with the distilled "bias". Folks. Get your acts together NOW.
You personally gonna plug the leaks from... everywhere? . Its a new day'n age.. Protect your data and be careful where you place your privates.. keys.. wink winkNone of which changes the past or the right of anybody to express their opinion in a private setting.
First:
Well who Rosenstein is in charge of has Nothing to do with how I feel about him.
Second:
You have never seen me say "lock her up" or "lock get up".
Did they start the impeachment yet?