O'Reilly is so fake! He's a Republican equivalent of Rosie O'Donnell. Check this out: Just very recently, I heard on Drudge report that he was going to cohost his show with Hillary (some radio talk show he'll start by May):
"O'Reilly Adds Female Factor". I was like "uh!"
Well, I gave up on O'Reilly over 3 years ago. I haven't watched his show in over 3 years now. I knew he was into it all for money, just like Rosie is and was. He started with this very conservative pic, and then gradually slacked and changed his note.
Rosie has no credibility at all either. I give no credence to anyone who took an extreme position and spoke out loud about it, yet later he or she comes to me and tells me to believe him or her on a new position? (It's kinda lika that so-called ex-Republican now Democrat who claims we are blinded by the right and all of the talk show hosts. What credibility has he now? How do we know he's not up to ripping us? A deceiver is always a deceiver until he or she has done enough to show otherwise.) And even during the period they took an extreme position, they failed to meet up the standard they espoused or claimed to espouse rather? That's crap. I would rather appreciate someone who's consistent with his or her postion continually, even if it is one I disagree with. Credibility is what matters a lot to me in one's character. Neither O'Reilly nor Rosie is credible. Money matters more to both of them.
And as far as I'm concerned, I will not ever waste my time on any of their shows. I don't look up to celebrities or politicians for what is right or wrong in my life and what to condone or conform to.
I'm flabbergasted to see the amount of trust people put upon either of these characters, but O'Donnell's is more shocking to me. How could anyone honestly believe an incredulous woman when she states that 9/11 changed her mind!!! Was she credible before 9/11? Why is she any credible now? I guess it tells how gullible we all are as human beings, for even when one exhibits a behaviour that logically leads us to conclude she is not a credible authority, we still do not care because now she professes the beliefs we claim to have. I guess it is only when her other side shows again with her pattern of behaviour that we would begin questioning her motive or credibility. Oh! It must be a forgery 'cuz she's back to her old ways 5 years from now.