Roth IRA

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

GotIssues

Golden Member
Jan 31, 2003
1,631
0
76
Can I improve my 401k and IRA by tracking the performance of the funds and switching to better funds periodically?

What criteria do some of you use? If the 3mo average is negative? 6mo?

One obvious move that worked well for me a few years ago was to move a large portion of my IRA into a Real Estate Fund. It has had awesome returns as the real estate market has picked back up.

It seems that if you make decisions on recent past performance and move to another fund, you might miss the rebound or you might move into a high performer at its peak and lose more money that if you stayed put.

It's like the opening scene of Office Space when he is switching lanes in a traffic jam.

Some of you are saying to play stocks hard when the going is good, then switch to bonds when the market appears to be going bad for stocks. That seems way too difficult to predict.

Buy index funds, not mutual funds. In nearly every case, an index fund will outperform a mutual fund.
 

GotIssues

Golden Member
Jan 31, 2003
1,631
0
76
And that's the secret to get rich... timing. I like to keep myself diversified in terms of geography, company size, sectors, and growth/value. I'll overweight in areas where I believe the money/returns are at and be underweight the slow areas. I'll be risk-on during the start (or prior to start) of good times and buy more. I'll start selling a bit if things look toppy or slow down. I'll be risk-off and move out of stocks during down times.

The worst advice to give someone who doesn't know what they are doing or not planning on putting the excessive amount of work necessary into it is "Try to time the stock market."

The stock market is not a logical beast, it is an emotional one. Timing is a fools errand, unless you are talking long timelines (not day trading, year+ ownership) and putting the necessary research into what you are buying. Best long term strategy for 99% of people is an index fund.
 

edro

Lifer
Apr 5, 2002
24,328
68
91
Most 401k and IRA funds are not segmented to allow changing by geography, company size, sectors, etc.
You are pretty much stuck with a mostly Index funds and a few mutual funds or stable growth funds.
 

mshan

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2004
7,868
0
71
People are often their own worst enemy (page 6: average mutual fund return (8.8% / $53,562) vs. average return of typical mutual fund investor (3.2% / $18,676):http://selectedfunds.com/downloads/SFSuccInv1210.pdf

"the average stock fund delivered an average annual return of 8.8% per year from
1990 to 2009, the average stock fund investor received an average annualized return of
only 3.2% per year."
Buy and hold, however, does not mean choose blindly and forget. You have to understand that a broad based total market index fund will lag, and lag very badly, when a particular sector is hot and some active mutual funds can really overweight that sector and the domestic total stock market fund can't (it always holds a representative of the total U. S. domestic stock market in a market-capitalization weighted way). The total market index fund has not suddenly gone bad, you just have to step back and look at the investment from a long time horizon (retirement decades away) perspective and understand what will drive that outperformance (instead of trying to beat the market at any given point in time, it just takes what the market gives, minimizing the inevitable drag from high expense ratios, high hidden transaction costs from heavy portfolio turnover, taxes, and asset gatherer mutual funds who are only looking for relative performance to attract and keep billions of dollars undermanagement so they get rich even if the fund itself ends up basically imploding performancewise over time because it has too many billions of dollars of assets to deploy in a high turnover, momentum type portfolio strategy).
 
Last edited:

sunzt

Diamond Member
Nov 27, 2003
3,076
3
81
Most 401k and IRA funds are not segmented to allow changing by geography, company size, sectors, etc.
You are pretty much stuck with a mostly Index funds and a few mutual funds or stable growth funds.

Hmm.. maybe it's just my companies, but my 401k's from ING and Fidelity offer those options (fidelity excessively so).
 

drinkmorejava

Diamond Member
Jun 24, 2004
3,567
7
81
I'm changing my previous post.

Invest 5k in the IRA, put the other 5k in a Series I Bond on TreasuryDirect.gov. Their current rate is 2.3%/6months, you can withdraw after 1 year. Before 5 years you owe a 3 month interest penalty. They're also inflation adjusted with an update every 6 months, but the current rate is 0%
 
Last edited:

Terzo

Platinum Member
Dec 13, 2005
2,589
27
91
Buy and hold, however, does not mean choose blindly and forget.


Isn't that essentially what you're suggesting to do with an index fund? Invest in one, ignore the short term fluctuations, and end up with a good return over the long haul?
 

mshan

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2004
7,868
0
71
You have to understand how a specific total stock market fund (VTSMX) will inexorably gain it's outperformance over very extended periods of time (again, decades, not years) and be comfortable with that (if you sell when it is temporarily out of favor and badly lagging lots of actively managed funds that can load up on hot sectors in any given market, you really defeat all of the intrinsic advantages of the correct total stock market index fund from a long-term shareholder friendly company such as Vanguard offers).

Choosing blindly and forget is more apt for choosing a hot actively managed fund that has done well over last 5 - 10 years and assume it will always be the same, particularly if that money manager uses a higher turnover, momentum type investing style (contrarian growth or deep value has higher likelihood of outperforming over time because they are buying when everyone else wants to give away temporarily out of favor stocks, and they are selling when market is getting frothy and momentum type investors are all too eager to buy those now in favor stocks that same momentum investors were quite willingly puking up 3 - 5 years ago).

I specifically recommend VTSMX, and not other low cost total stock market index funds, because it, in my opinion, is most likely to be shareholder friendly over the long-term (continuing to decrease expense ratio as total assets under management increase, automatically converting you to even lower cost Admiral shares when your investment reaches a certain point) and not doing something non-shareholder friendly for it's long-term investors like jacking expense ratio or changing the benchmarked index drastically some time in future (this is much more important in taxable account than tax-deferred account)

VTSMX is a great core investment, particularly in a taxable account, around which you can overweight or underweight other sectors over time with high quality, shareholder friendly actively managed, non-sector funds (true sector funds are, by mandate, stuck in a particular sector even if that sector is out of favor for many years and are a loser's game for truly long-term investors; I mean something such as Large Cap Growth / Value / Blend, Midcap same or Smallcap same) shareholder-friendly, actively managed funds.

When you get beyond 20 years, it is very hard for most actively managed fund to consistently overcome the at least 2 - 3% average annual return they give away because of high expense ratio, hidden transaction costs because of high portfolio strategy, and taxes.

And at this point, the relative perfomance chasing, asset gathering, actively managed fund which in reality has morphed into a quasi-index fund (they have so many billions of dollars under management that they can't take meaningful positions in any given stock, so they end up indexing vast majority of assets, and try and gain outperformance by overweighting in favor sector and underweighting currently out of favor sector). Problem is that type of strategy still has significant hidden transaction costs associated with it, and may not be as tax-friendly as you would like (VTSMX owns whole market, so capital gains distributions should be very low and tax-efficiency very high. Plus you are aggressive in proper sense - 99%+ in stocks at all times).

The fund managers who created a great record over last 5 - 10 years and drew in tons of hot, dumb money in process, has long since retired very, very wealthy, and leaves those choose blindly and forget investors with the crap, market lagging investment that that mutual fund has become.
 
Last edited:

Ninjahedge

Diamond Member
Mar 2, 2005
4,149
1
91
Bottom line is simple.

Research your mutuals and other assets and keep an ear to the wind to try and see what major things are coming (I am kicking myself over not bailing earlier in 2008, and not jumping on the band wagon with the whole STUPID Lybian thing and Petro prices...)

If you time it PERFECTLY, you will make MUCH MUCH money. But even not perfect timing can save you boku bucks.

I would have saved about 20% of my investment if I had bailed out the day AFTER the first market drop in 2K8, and more if I had simply gone "gold" earlier that year.

Do not play it like a day trader. Plan it like any other long term deal. Either constant casual study, or serious quarterly study should be more than enough to keep you from falling down the well in the back yard.
 

JEDI

Lifer
Sep 25, 2001
30,160
3,302
126
the one thing i remember from college was my business teacher telling me that if you maxed out your roth ira from the age of 18-28 (for 10 years) you would have more $$$ in there by the time you retire if you maxed it out from 30 - 60.

this is of course, if you got the average historical gains of like 10%.

i wish i started mine earlier. i'm 29 now and started mine a few years ago. i'm putting $400/mo into it now, and hopefully forever. this is on top of doing the max possible in my 401k that my company matches.

if u have the $, its better to dump all $5k on the 1st trading day of the year instead of dollar cost avg over the yeaR
 
Last edited:

GotIssues

Golden Member
Jan 31, 2003
1,631
0
76
if u have the $, its better to dump all $5k on the 1st trading day of the year instead of dollar cost avg over the yeaR

Kind of. If the market goes up, yes. If it goes down, no.

Dollar cost averaging is a more defensive investing idea to reduce risk and preserve capital that works great if that's your investing mentality. If it were my money, I'd put in the first day, but dollar cost averaging serves a purpose for the more risk-averse investors.
 

50

Platinum Member
May 7, 2003
2,717
0
0
So there seems to be a lot of good advice in this thread, but no one has really suggested any good sources for research so that we can make timely decisions. For someone who just graduated last year and wants to start looking into long term investments where's a good place to start doing research?
 

sunzt

Diamond Member
Nov 27, 2003
3,076
3
81
So there seems to be a lot of good advice in this thread, but no one has really suggested any good sources for research so that we can make timely decisions. For someone who just graduated last year and wants to start looking into long term investments where's a good place to start doing research?

what do you mean "timely" decisions? You mean you want to learn how to trade or invest?
 

sunzt

Diamond Member
Nov 27, 2003
3,076
3
81
Kind of. If the market goes up, yes. If it goes down, no.

Dollar cost averaging is a more defensive investing idea to reduce risk and preserve capital that works great if that's your investing mentality. If it were my money, I'd put in the first day, but dollar cost averaging serves a purpose for the more risk-averse investors.

You can dollar cost average even if you dump all your money in on the first day. It'll still earn interest so there really is no disadvantage to dumping it on the first day unless u need access to the cash.
 

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
25,214
3,632
126
So there seems to be a lot of good advice in this thread, but no one has really suggested any good sources for research so that we can make timely decisions. For someone who just graduated last year and wants to start looking into long term investments where's a good place to start doing research?
1) Start by starting. That is, open an account and get money into it. If you are confident, put a lot in. If not, put in a little each month. Start with your employer's retirement plans. If you can get a company match, then that is free money, so take it. Plus, employer accounts tend not to have minimum investment limits nor do they give things that are overly risky. After that try a Roth IRA if you qualify. Note: many IRA accounts have minimums, so you'll likely have to put in at least a few thousand dollars. I often suggest Vanguard as a starting point since you have good selections at low fees.

2) It doesn't matter really what you put your money in now, as long as it is not some extreme risky thing. A mutual fund is a good safe initial bet that is likely to pay well over the long-term. Like I posted above, the difference from one fund to the next when you are just starting to invest is about the same money difference as deciding to go out to eat or eating at home. Just start investing, that is all you need for now.

3) I happen to like this book as a good beginner suggestion. In that book, Berstein teaches the main points, in easy to understand format, with plenty of graphs, and historical data to back him up. History might not repeat itself, but it is a great starting point to learn about investing. It is a quick read and actually an enjoyable book.
 
Last edited:

HybridSquirrel

Diamond Member
Nov 20, 2005
6,161
2
81
Assuming you qualify (there are income limits), then yes you should do it. The sooner you save, the more time you'll have for it to grow. With a Roth IRA, all growth is completely tax free (unless there is some major, major change to tax laws in the future).

Think of it this way. If you put the maximum in now ($5000 is allowed each year), and assuming the stock market behaves about the same as it has for decades, and invest nothing else in the rest of your life, then you'll have a quarter million dollars when you retire. Do this for four years when you are young, and you'll retire a millionaire (completely tax free).

There are some risks. You could make a bad investment decision. The stock market could tank and you lose some money. But, the stock market has never done poorly for an extended period. You'll have to have a very big financial disaster to not retire with lots of money if you invest at your age.

I'd personally suggest a simple start. Open a Vanguard Roth IRA, deposit $5000, and buy either VFINX or VFFVX mutual funds. Either fund one is diverse (meaning if a company goes bad you don't own much and meaning if a company does really really well then you get a piece of it). Either fund has low fees and is likely to do pretty well in the future. In a few years, you can look back and adjust to different mutual funds if you want. Where you start investing usually has no measurable impact on how well you do in the long term (unless you do really stupid risky things).


IIRC with inflation factored in, you can save in your early twenties, and even throwing 1500 a year into an IRA will net you about 2.8 million by the time you are 60 some and you can except ~2% increase per year....roughly.
 

Bignate603

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
13,897
1
0
Meh, considering that 2008-2009 was horrible you probably didn't loose out too much compared to starting just 4years ago. Now if you had started 1 or 2 years ago...

My 3year return on VFIFX (vanguard 2050 retirement) is less than 2%.

I started contributing to my 401k about 2 years ago. There were some awesome months early on where my annualized return was 30% or more. Unfortunately, since I had just started contributing the total amount of money I had in there was really small.

small amount of money x great rate of return = still small amount of money. :'(

Oh well, in less than 2 1/2 years of only putting in 8% of my income the returns and matching from my employer has pushed me up past $20k in the 401k so far.
 

edro

Lifer
Apr 5, 2002
24,328
68
91
Are there any "what if" calculators out there?
Like, what if I had $X in X_Stock on X_Date and sold on this date?

There has to be a website that keeps track of ending prices of all stocks for each day.
Anyone?
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |