RRAACCEE!!!!!!!!!! - King's Gauntlet 2007

[bryanW1995]

you guys are killing me. Fortunately, I am disciplined. I can wait the 2 extra months...really... I can...Q9450, I hear you calling me...what, the line is disconnected because phenom is so late/slow? you won't be here until april and I should upgrade now? hold on, you sound a lot like assimilator1...

 

[petrusbroder]

LoL!

more! More! MOre! MORe! MORE! MORE! and then even MMMMOOOORRRRE!

 

[Smoke]

Originally posted by: Assimilator1
Smoke
Where am i in those stats?:brokenheart:

I don't know how you got left out? You must have been one of the ones that were not picked up at the time of my data fetch. I thought I was done with constructing these reports but since you were not in my last report (knowing how you keep everything ever posted) I will make one more, just in your honor.



[*] TeAm ?. 5-Nov ?. 6-Nov ?. 7-Nov ?. 8-Nov ?. 9-Nov ?. 10-Nov ?. Total ??. Name
[*] TeAm ? 13,297 ? 14,581 ? 10,993 ? 15,355 ? 12,918 ? 15,642 ? 82,786 .... keeleysam
[*] TeAm ?.. 8,943 ?.. 7,495 ?.. 9,128 ?.. 8,381 ?.. 8,472 ?.. 7,577 ? 49,996 .... petrusbroder
[*] TeAm ?.. 7,728 ?.. 7,820 ?.. 9,218 ?.. 7,928 ?.. 7,005 ?.. 7,544 ? 47,243 .... Arlen - Team AnandTech
[*] TeAm ?.. 9,997 ?.. 5,165 ?.. 8,334 ?.. 6,303 ?.. 7,426 ?.. 7,063 ? 44,288 .... TeAm Enterprise
[*] TeAm ?.. 6,835 ?.. 5,418 ?.. 6,175 ?.. 7,218 ?.. 6,742 ?.. 6,082 ? 38,470 .... mfl0p
[*] TeAm ?.. 4,847 ?.. 6,970 ?.. 5,285 ?.. 4,842 ?.. 4,516 ?.. 5,664 ? 31,223 .... Bryan Wallace
[*] TeAm ?.. 4,267 ?.. 3,840 ?.. 6,967 ?.. 4,468 ?.. 6,017 ?.. 3,694 ? 30,154 .... baxsie
[*] TeAm ?.. 5,339 ?.. 4,039 ?.. 4,787 ?.. 5,161 ?.. 4,310 ?.. 5,184 ? 28,820 .... caferace
[*] TeAm ?.. 3,760 ?.. 3,812 ?.. 4,984 ?.. 4,125 ?.. 4,984 ?.. 3,748 ? 25,413 .... mk
[*] TeAm ?.. 3,058 ?.. 3,063 ?.. 4,209 ?.. 3,931 ?.. 3,999 ?.. 3,386 ? 21,646 .... Alyx
[*] TeAm ?.. 2,012 ?.. 2,009 ?.. 4,141 ?.. 3,422 ?.. 4,284 ?.. 3,856 ? 19,724 .... Khyron
[*] TeAm ?.. 2,303 ?.. 2,629 ?.. 3,897 ?.. 2,662 ?.. 2,867 ?.. 1,707 ? 16,065 .... Rudy Toody
[*] TeAm ?.. 5,300 ?.. 1,390 ?.. 1,935 ?.. 2,118 ?.. 2,616 ?.. 2,057 ? 15,416 .... Tom Philippart
[*] TeAm ?.. 2,141 ?.. 2,381 ?.. 2,278 ?.. 2,852 ?.. 2,289 ?.. 7,122 ? 14,627 .... Todd Hebert
[*] TeAm ?.. 1,589 ?.. 2,283 ?.. 2,941 ?.. 2,504 ?.. 2,614 ?.. 2,319 ? 14,250 .... Rebel Alliance
[*] TeAm ??.. 698 ?.. 2,114 ?.. 1,974 ?.. 1,984 ?.. 1,268 ?.. 1,989 ? 13,930 .... Coolkid
[*] TeAm ?.. 1,368 ?.. 1,218 ?.. 1,862 ??.. 951 ?.. 2,042 ?.. 2,341 ? 11,557 .... Assimilator1 - Team AnandTech
[*] TeAm ??.. 479 ?.. 1,853 ??.. 808 ?.. 1,678 ?.. 1,596 ?.. 1,797 ?.. 9,835 .... Ingleside
[*] TeAm ?.. 1,492 ??.. 932 ?.. 1,173 ?.. 1,504 ?.. 1,223 ?.. 1,186 ?.. 8,627 .... Simon
[*] TeAm ??.. 684 ??.. 578 ??.. 967 ?.. 1,426 ?.. 1,447 ?.. 1,550 ?.. 7,964 .... QuietDad
[*] TeAm ?.. 1,163 ??.. 763 ??.. 883 ??.. 629 ?.. 1,170 ??.. 539 ?.. 6,863 .... GenHoth
[*] TeAm ?.. 1,256 ??.. 363 ??.. 414 ??.. 124 ?.. 1,270 ?.. 1,105 ?.. 6,207 .... LANMAN
[*] TeAm ??.. 661 ??.. 416 ??.. 827 ??.. 653 ??.. 703 ??.. 815 ?.. 5,423 .... salvorhardin
[*] TeAm ??.. 676 ??.. 681 ??.. 506 ??.. 595 ??.. 584 ??.. 592 ?.. 4,019 .... Yooshaw
[*] TeAm ??.. 126 ??.. 421 ??.. 607 ??.. 446 ??.. 554 ??.. 410 ?.. 3,670 .... hymy
[*] TeAm ??.. 758 ??.. 310 ??.. 421 ??.. 137 ??.. 444 ??.. 511 ?.. 3,553 .... Ken_g6 - Team Anandtech
[*] TeAm ??.. 126 ??.. 126 ??.. 126 ??.. 421 ??.. 607 ??.. 446 ?.. 2,303 .... panhead49
[*] TeAm ??.. 758 ??.. 758 ??.. 758 ??.. 310 ??.. 421 ??.. 137 ?.. 2,260 .... Coquito

 

[Assimilator1]

Originally posted by: SETIdude
uh oh.. what's this...
just built another Q6600 running at 3ghz

got fl0ps?

go TeAm!

lol,cool!

Smoke
Nice speed for starters!:Q
And thanks for the stats ,v2

bryanW
heh

Jim
Sweet! ,let us know what you get out of it

 

[Rattledagger]

Originally posted by: keeleysam
Everyone should be using Crunch3r's 2.4V applications. They are faster than the ones at lunatics.at. Also, if you have more than one core, you should be using Crunch3r's 5.9.0 app, which sets affinity to speed things up even more. If you're running a 64-bit operating system, make sure to get the 64-bit versions, they are significantly faster.

Well, going against the excellent recommendation of Smoke of not "tear engine appart during the middle of a race", have been fooling-around with Crunch3r's optimized seti-applications.

All Windows, Crunch3r-v2.4-non-graphics-clients:
#1, Old Amd, 32-bit-SSE. Haven't got the exact same angle-range, but from close neightbours to 0.409xxx indicates 5%-10% increase.
#2. Opteron, 64-bit-SSE2. On AR = 0.392899, 25% increase.

Hmm, you indicated 15-20% increase in production, so this seems to be better than expected, doesn't it? ...


... Except, the times isn't a 25% increase in production. Instead it's a 25% increase in CPU-TIME.

Meaning, atleast on my Amd-computers, the official SETI@home-application is faster than the so-called "optimized" ones.

 

[keeleysam]

I've just brought up another 14GHz of crunching power.

 

[bryanW1995]

Originally posted by: Rattledagger

Originally posted by: keeleysam
Everyone should be using Crunch3r's 2.4V applications. They are faster than the ones at lunatics.at. Also, if you have more than one core, you should be using Crunch3r's 5.9.0 app, which sets affinity to speed things up even more. If you're running a 64-bit operating system, make sure to get the 64-bit versions, they are significantly faster.

Well, going against the excellent recommendation of Smoke of not "tear engine appart during the middle of a race", have been fooling-around with Crunch3r's optimized seti-applications.

All Windows, Crunch3r-v2.4-non-graphics-clients:
#1, Old Amd, 32-bit-SSE. Haven't got the exact same angle-range, but from close neightbours to 0.409xxx indicates 5%-10% increase.
#2. Opteron, 64-bit-SSE2. On AR = 0.392899, 25% increase.

Hmm, you indicated 15-20% increase in production, so this seems to be better than expected, doesn't it? ...


... Except, the times isn't a 25% increase in production. Instead it's a 25% increase in CPU-TIME.

Meaning, atleast on my Amd-computers, the official SETI@home-application is faster than the so-called "optimized" ones.

that's crazy! I have 2 x2 amd cpus running at 2.4 and 2.43 that I recently upgraded to the crunch3r v2.4 non-graphics (this is the same client as the one listed at lunatics.at btw). The best RAC I EVER got on them before was 700. I'm now up to almost 900 on one and the other is climbing fast ( that's the one that I had to reinstall the OS on the other day). My overall team RAC has risen dramatically from 3700-3800 avg to 4750 now, although that also includes the great result from the ssse3 optimized client on my e6750.

 

[Smoke]

Originally posted by: keeleysam
I've just brought up another 14GHz of crunching power.

:beer:

 

[caferace]

Originally posted by: Smoke

Originally posted by: keeleysam
I've just brought up another 14GHz of crunching power.

:beer:

Indeed. One has to appreciate that kind of quiet understatement. :thumbsup:

-jim

 

[petrusbroder]

Yeah ...

 

[Coolkid]

Originally posted by: Smoke

TeAm ??.. 698 ?.. 2,114 ?.. 1,974 ?.. 1,984 ?.. 1,268 ?.. 1,989 ? 13,930 .... Coolkid
TeAm ?.. 1,368 ?.. 1,218 ?.. 1,862 ??.. 951 ?.. 2,042 ?.. 2,341 ? 11,557 .... Assimilator1 - Team AnandTech

Oh noez, I'm in trouble :Q

 

[Assimilator1]

Originally posted by: keeleysam
I've just brought up another 14GHz of crunching power.

Awesome!

CoolKid
RAC from SETIs own stats
23) Assimilator1 - Team AnandTech 1,660.04 United Kingdom
24) Coolkid 1,592.14 Australia

No catching me now! ,& I plan to have my revenge in DPAD too :evil:

 

[Rattledagger]

Originally posted by: bryanW1995
that's crazy! I have 2 x2 amd cpus running at 2.4 and 2.43 that I recently upgraded to the crunch3r v2.4 non-graphics (this is the same client as the one listed at lunatics.at btw). The best RAC I EVER got on them before was 700. I'm now up to almost 900 on one and the other is climbing fast ( that's the one that I had to reinstall the OS on the other day). My overall team RAC has risen dramatically from 3700-3800 avg to 4750 now, although that also includes the great result from the ssse3 optimized client on my e6750.

Actually, I'm not the 1st. one that has got mediocre performance with the 64-bit application on Amd, if you dig through the SETI@home-forums you'll see some posts that indicates it's faster on some AR, but slower or no noticeable difference on majority of wu's.

 

[keeleysam]

Just brought up an E6700 that was down for a few weeks.

Hoping to hit 19,000 RAC in three days.

 

[bryanW1995]

Originally posted by: Rattledagger

Originally posted by: bryanW1995
that's crazy! I have 2 x2 amd cpus running at 2.4 and 2.43 that I recently upgraded to the crunch3r v2.4 non-graphics (this is the same client as the one listed at lunatics.at btw). The best RAC I EVER got on them before was 700. I'm now up to almost 900 on one and the other is climbing fast ( that's the one that I had to reinstall the OS on the other day). My overall team RAC has risen dramatically from 3700-3800 avg to 4750 now, although that also includes the great result from the ssse3 optimized client on my e6750.

Actually, I'm not the 1st. one that has got mediocre performance with the 64-bit application on Amd, if you dig through the SETI@home-forums you'll see some posts that indicates it's faster on some AR, but slower or no noticeable difference on majority of wu's.

I missed the 64 bit reference. I'm running xp pro 32 bit on those two computers. In fact, I have xp pro on all my rigs except the e6750 and the xp2400+ (xp home on those). Maybe you could try using the 32 bit optimizer?

@KEELEYSAM: nice!

 

[petrusbroder]

Very nice, keelysam!

petrus is somewhat envious!

 

[Assimilator1]

Well I was going to try a little race commentary but I just tried to go to the S@NL thread to see how we're doing & all I get is a blank white page ,anyone else not able to get there?
Btw stats site worked fine.

Originally posted by: keeleysam
Just brought up an E6700 that was down for a few weeks.

Hoping to hit 19,000 RAC in three days.

More power!:Q

 

[Philippart]

We're in position 6 right now:

Overclockers.com 1.793.672
2 BOINC.BE 1.637.203
3 Paddys and Ireland 1.430.651
4 Ireland 1.202.898
5 UK BOINC Team 1.037.570
6 TeAm AnandTech 972.203
7 SETI.Germany 966.704
8 Dutch Power Cows 727.441
9 SETI@Netherlands 703.982
10 BOINC@Poland 580.286
11 OcUK - Overclockers UK 376.252
12 BOINC Synergy 314.945
13 Icewolves 256.947
14 Planet 3DNow! 232.167
15 PADDYS IN SPACE 227.753

 

[keeleysam]

I should be bringing up an Opteron 165 tomorrow.

 

[Smoke]

Dang, when I got up this morning I found my fastest system (doing around 4,000 @ day) hung up on the reboot splash screen. It seems overnight MS did an update that required rebooting and my Q6600 system didn't quite make it. Not sure how many hours it was down but ... well, dang it anyway. :|

 

[Coquito]

I've been terrible. Sorry guys, I just can't seem to grab more then a handful of WUs every other day. I was a much bigger player in the last Seti Classic race we had.

 

[caferace]

I just joined the 4k club. w00t!

Recent average credit 4,000.99

-jim

 

[petrusbroder]

No sweat, Coquito! Your contribution counts all the way!
Well done -jim, welcome!

 

[Rudy Toody]

Originally posted by: caferace
I just joined the 4k club. w00t!

Recent average credit 4,000.99

-jim

I wondered what flew by me.

 

[Assimilator1]

RAC SETI stats

23) Coolkid....................................1,932.96 Australia
24) Assimilator1 - Team AnandTech 1,905.92 United Kingdom
25) Rebel Alliance ..........................1,816.10 United States
26) Tom Philippart .........................1,811.20 Luxembourg

A multinational race! & very close too!:Q
CK if you keep this up I will have to up my CPU 100MHz so their

Jim
You're not that far off passing me!:Q

Coquito
Every little helps

Smoke
Dang that sucks!


No one answering my earlier question?