Question RTX 4000/RX 7000 price speculation thread

Page 8 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

moonbogg

Lifer
Jan 8, 2011
10,637
3,095
136
My prediction: The entire generation will be 2-3X msrp on ebay and at retailers. RTX 3000 series will be sold along side the 4000 series because only a few will be buying RTX 4000 series who are willing to pay $1500 for what should be a $300 RTX 4060. Not enough supply to meet demand by a long shot, pricing will be through the Oort cloud. PC gaming is dead. Your thoughts?
 

Hail The Brain Slug

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 2005
3,243
1,680
136
Nvidia has about 2 updates a month. Not sure why it matters though. I want good drivers, not frequent installs.

Nvidia quite often has known problems that take quite a while to fix, so it's not like a driver update fixes all existing bugs. That doesn't seem any different for AMD, although I'm not sure how well they are at fixing bugs exactly.

edit: n\m you are a different poster.

AMD and Nvidia both appear to release driver updates on similar cadences. They both have persistent issues and both release game ready drivers. I have both modern AMD and modern nvidia systems and I don't see any meaningful difference in driver quality or release schedule.

It doesn't matter, but the previous poster made the claim nvidia releases drivers 3-4x as often as AMD which is blatantly false.
 
Last edited:

Ajay

Lifer
Jan 8, 2001
16,094
8,106
136
I think again ultimately my deciding factor will be on what Threadripper comes out with.
If the next Gen HEDT's are trash, like how they are now, then i guess i will get whatever gives me the most performance without breaking the 5th wall in budget.

But if next gen HEDT's are good, then if its intel, i would probably go with NVidia's solution, and if its Threadripper, i will most likely go with the RX solution provided SAM improvements are out there, and SAM works as intended.

But AMD's only downside is the lack of driver updates.
Nvidia is poping drivers updates at a rate of 3-4x what AMD has.
This is why i keep with Nvidia, otherwise i would of probably went on 6900XT's and not my 3090 seeing how it was 40% cheaper @ a less then 5% performance benifit.
AMD's Threadripper Pro 5000 series is OEM only for now, built on the WRX80 chipset/platform. Not really an enthusiast HEDT system. Not sure what Intel will be doing with HEDT, rumors seem to indicate a tradition high performance system friendlier to DIYers - guess we'll have to see. Seems like it would be based on Sapphire Rapids - anywhere from 14-56 cores ('P' cores only). I imagine Intel will be more overclocker friendly.
 

aigomorla

CPU, Cases&Cooling Mod PC Gaming Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 28, 2005
20,879
3,230
126
Nvidia is releasing 6-12 driver updates a month?

Genuinely asking because AMD is releasing 2-3, and on the rare occasion 4 a month.

Every game gets an zero day update.
Then you got your random updates to fix what the zero updates broke since it was not addressed as time to release zero day updates.

Driver wise, i do not think any company can outdue nvidia, although i am not admitting to all the updates being benifical or ground breaking except possibly the zero day game it applies to, but again, at the cost of older library compatibility. Sometimes i think nvidia really hires random monkeys to randomly press keys when writing some of their drivers.

I still have an update that broke 2 of my monitors firmware.
The monitors do not sleep if i install a driver after 327.x
And honestly i grew tired of Microsoft fighting against nvidia saying nothing is wrong on their end.

It doesn't matter, but the previous poster made the claim nvidia releases drivers 3-4x as often as AMD which is blatantly false.

I do not think AMD has the same amount of raw diver updates Nvidia has.
I know i am not updating that driver as much as my Nvidia.

And also from experience, Nvidia's zero day game drivers are better then AMD's after playing on both.
I have both flagships so i know first hand.


AMD's Threadripper Pro 5000 series is OEM only for now, built on the WRX80 chipset/platform. Not really an enthusiast HEDT system. Not sure what Intel will be doing with HEDT, rumors seem to indicate a tradition high performance system friendlier to DIYers - guess we'll have to see. Seems like it would be based on Sapphire Rapids - anywhere from 14-56 cores ('P' cores only). I imagine Intel will be more overclocker friendly.

At this point in gaming, i really do not care for the amount of cores on a HEDT.
I honestly think HEDT is a stupid subsection in PC building, which has no real niche... they should of just left it as enterprise, and kept it enterprise.

I really want the raw PCI-E lanes.
Each nVME is 4x, my 10gbe card takes 8x, i usually typically have 2 GPU's because my RiftS requires a DP, and i am also running 3 monitors.
Typically i have the RiftS on its own dedicated videocard.

But yeah 2 videocards = 32 lanes by itself, which by itself exceeds most consumer based systems including Ryzen 9 and i9's.

I need HEDT with lanes.... and not a super massive core count to drive the prices insane and into enterprise territory.

Hence why i am hoping the new HEDT will have a 12-16 core count segment with lots of cache and at least 64+ PCI-E Lanes to play with, as well as fundimentally allow overclocking ,which the TR PRO's don't, and don't get me started on the TR Pro.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: Shmee

Shmee

Memory & Storage, Graphics Cards Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 13, 2008
7,542
2,542
146
I agree with Aigo for the most part on HEDT. I want a nice high end desktop system, with lots of lanes and features, and a fair amount of cores. And it should be great for overclocking and gaming. That is why I loved X99 and X58 back in the day. Probably my favorite Intel platforms.

As for driver updates, in my recent experience it seems AMD has more, but a lot of them are not WHQL. Not being WHQL is not a big deal for most people, as IMO many of these new updates help with something, but the reason I prefer WHQL now is that 3Dmark requires it for being a legitimate benchmark score for some dumb reason. Also, a small negative for newer AMD drivers in general, is that miners such as Phoenix need to be updated to "properly" support the latest. This may be even more niche, but it is relevant for those who want to game on a Radeon card with the latest game drivers, and maybe mine on the off time when not gaming.

Anyway, great picture Aigo, both those are really nice cards!
 
Reactions: Tlh97

Golgatha

Lifer
Jul 18, 2003
12,683
1,600
126
I agree with Aigo for the most part on HEDT. I want a nice high end desktop system, with lots of lanes and features, and a fair amount of cores. And it should be great for overclocking and gaming. That is why I loved X99 and X58 back in the day. Probably my favorite Intel platforms.

As for driver updates, in my recent experience it seems AMD has more, but a lot of them are not WHQL. Not being WHQL is not a big deal for most people, as IMO many of these new updates help with something, but the reason I prefer WHQL now is that 3Dmark requires it for being a legitimate benchmark score for some dumb reason. Also, a small negative for newer AMD drivers in general, is that miners such as Phoenix need to be updated to "properly" support the latest. This may be even more niche, but it is relevant for those who want to game on a Radeon card with the latest game drivers, and maybe mine on the off time when not gaming.

Anyway, great picture Aigo, both those are really nice cards!

My X99 with an i7 5820k lasted me quite a long time, just shy of 6 years, and it's still chugging along as my dad's daily driver. I suspect my R9 5950X will give me a similar 5+ years of service. Also, since SLI is dead for gaming purposes, I don't worry too much about having lots of PCIe lanes anymore. More lanes would be nice to have if motherboards had more NVME slots, but typically they only have two slots.
 
Reactions: Tlh97 and biostud

GodisanAtheist

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2006
7,063
7,489
136
My X99 with an i7 5820k lasted me quite a long time, just shy of 6 years, and it's still chugging along as my dad's daily driver. I suspect my R9 5950X will give me a similar 5+ years of service. Also, since SLI is dead for gaming purposes, I don't worry too much about having lots of PCIe lanes anymore. More lanes would be nice to have if motherboards had more NVME slots, but typically they only have two slots.

- And here I am on my 6600K, rounding out 6 years of service come June...
 

Ajay

Lifer
Jan 8, 2001
16,094
8,106
136
At this point in gaming, i really do not care for the amount of cores on a HEDT.
I honestly think HEDT is a stupid subsection in PC building, which has no real niche... they should of just left it as enterprise, and kept it enterprise.

I really want the raw PCI-E lanes.
Each nVME is 4x, my 10gbe card takes 8x, i usually typically have 2 GPU's because my RiftS requires a DP, and i am also running 3 monitors.
Typically i have the RiftS on its own dedicated videocard.

But yeah 2 videocards = 32 lanes by itself, which by itself exceeds most consumer based systems including Ryzen 9 and i9's.

I need HEDT with lanes.... and not a super massive core count to drive the prices insane and into enterprise territory.

Hence why i am hoping the new HEDT will have a 12-16 core count segment with lots of cache and at least 64+ PCI-E Lanes to play with, as well as fundimentally allow overclocking ,which the TR PRO's don't, and don't get me started on the TR Pro.

Rumors point to 64 lanes for Sapphire Rapids X. It does suck that high end desktop CPUs don't offer more lanes. However, with PCIe Gen5, it would be nice if some enterprising mobo maker would just use a switch to provided 2x Gen4 lanes. That would make 48 for Alder Lake, but, OMG, got to have an overkill Gen5x16 lane slot for the primary GFX card . I really hope AMD bumps Zen4 up to 32 lanes, but I'm thinking that won't happen till Zen5 at best. In any case - good luck; maybe Intel will deliver some reasonable HEDT products for the DIY market.
 

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
14,835
5,454
136
OK, new speculation (at the end of the year)

Full Navi 31$2499
Cut Navi 31$1999Slight Cut AD102
Full Navi 32$1499Deeper Cut AD102
Cut Navi 32$1199
$999Full AD104
Full Navi 33$799Cut AD104
Cut Navi 33$6993080 10 GB (GA103)
6750 XT$4993070
6650 XT$3993060 Ti
$3293060
$2493050

With Navi 24 gone from the market.
 
Reactions: Ajay

aigomorla

CPU, Cases&Cooling Mod PC Gaming Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 28, 2005
20,879
3,230
126
What is this thing called "MSRP" websites are stating?
Name one MSRP the past 3 yrs which actually held true.
MSRP died 2019 long with the category "budget pc gamer".
 
Reactions: Tlh97 and moonbogg

GodisanAtheist

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2006
7,063
7,489
136
What is this thing called "MSRP" websites are stating?
Name one MSRP the past 3 yrs which actually held true.
MSRP died 2019 long with the category "budget pc gamer".

- Arizona Iced Tea is still $0.99. The fact that its printed on the can makes retailer mark-up a bit awkward too...

But I'm pretty sure that's not what you meant.

Maybe the card MSRP should just be printed on the box/card somewhere?
 

DeathReborn

Platinum Member
Oct 11, 2005
2,756
751
136
- Arizona Iced Tea is still $0.99. The fact that its printed on the can makes retailer mark-up a bit awkward too...

But I'm pretty sure that's not what you meant.

Maybe the card MSRP should just be printed on the box/card somewhere?

The price used to be on some brand boxes in the 90's but some places would make identical tickers with higher prices. If it was still the case then 2019 would have been the year to invest in label/sticker makers...
 

Aapje

Golden Member
Mar 21, 2022
1,467
2,031
106
MSRP is just for the FE designs, though. The cards from ASUS, EVGA, etc are not the same design. So the cost to make them is different, as well as the value.
 

moonbogg

Lifer
Jan 8, 2011
10,637
3,095
136
The high prices (excluding mining frenzies) must be propped up by young, impulsive kids with credit cards. I know for a fact that if credit cards weren't accepted for sales and some 20-something gamer had to hand over $1500 in actual cash from their bank account to buy a stupid GPU, they would NOT be buying that GPU. Not now and probably not ever. Sales of high-end GPUs would plummet by 90%. Nvidia will continue to exploit stupid, because stupid is unfortunately a perfectly renewable resource for them.
The 4000 series will exploit the vast resource of stupid and will be the most profitable generation in Nvidia's history. These days, if a new GPU performs significantly better than last gen, it's considered an anomalous breakthrough and any price hike is seen as more than justified. If the cards are fast, they will cost an absolute fortune and people will fight over their chance to buy them as if tossing a loaf of bread into a crowd of starving people.
 
Last edited:

Dannar26

Senior member
Mar 13, 2012
754
142
106
MSRP is just for the FE designs, though. The cards from ASUS, EVGA, etc are not the same design. So the cost to make them is different, as well as the value.

Ugh.

Yes, you are technically right. But AiB models aren't some super powered wonder that boost performance in double digits. It's a fancy shroud, and bragging rights that you have EVGA's WTFOMGBBQ3DXXX edition card. It's even worse value when somebody buys a card like that for a mid-tier model, often over paying to the point where they should have just bought the base model of the next tier up. Why buy a 3070 LOLURMUM edition when it costs as much as a 3080?

It's not worth it. And it's silly to use that as justification of price hikes. But hey, I'm sure your kingpin beat my "pedestrian" FE model by 3 FPS the one time, so that's worth it.

The high prices (excluding mining frenzies) must be propped up by young, impulsive kids with credit cards. I know for a fact that if credit cards weren't accepted for sales and some 20-something gamer had to hand over $1500 in actual cash from their bank account to buy a stupid GPU, they would NOT be buying that GPU. Not now and probably not ever. Sales of high-end GPUs would plummet by 90%. Nvidia will continue to exploit stupid, because stupid is unfortunately a perfectly renewable resource for them.
The 4000 series will exploit the vast resource of stupid and will be the most profitable generation in Nvidia's history. These days, if a new GPU performs significantly better than last gen, it's considered an anomalous breakthrough and any price hike is seen as more than justified. If the cards are fast, they will cost an absolute fortune and people will fight over their chance to buy them as if tossing a loaf of bread into a crowd of starving people.

I keep forgetting how most people are in credit card debt. I'm not rich or really that great with money, but I don't carry a balance on my cards. I agree that this must be why these fools keep paying these insane prices. When you're using a card, prices become more of an abstract thing -- moreso when you're looking at it as "hur durr I only pay this much per month."
 

Aapje

Golden Member
Mar 21, 2022
1,467
2,031
106
It's a fancy shroud, and bragging rights that you have EVGA's WTFOMGBBQ3DXXX edition card.

No, the more expensive cards often have bigger cooling blocks, more fans, better VRMs and/or higher power limits. Also, they are often tuned and designed a bit better.

Now, much of this is not that important if you don't overclock your cards and I think that many people overspend, as they pay too much for features that they to a large extent don't use. Still, these features all add value and I'd certainly prefer one of these better cards for a small extra cost over a budget card, but the actual extra cost is a lot more than the extra value that I see.

Then again, I'm more interested in undervolting than overclocking, so I may not be typical.

However, I've already seen an undervolt and underclock guide on an 'enthusiast' website and I expect the next gen to make even more people interested in this.
 

Golgatha

Lifer
Jul 18, 2003
12,683
1,600
126
No, the more expensive cards often have bigger cooling blocks, more fans, better VRMs and/or higher power limits. Also, they are often tuned and designed a bit better.

Now, much of this is not that important if you don't overclock your cards and I think that many people overspend, as they pay too much for features that they to a large extent don't use. Still, these features all add value and I'd certainly prefer one of these better cards for a small extra cost over a budget card, but the actual extra cost is a lot more than the extra value that I see.

Then again, I'm more interested in undervolting than overclocking, so I may not be typical.

However, I've already seen an undervolt and underclock guide on an 'enthusiast' website and I expect the next gen to make even more people interested in this.

It's kinda funny, but on the eVGA cards I have, I like the OC BIOS because the fan profiles are more aggressive. The card runs a bit cooler and faster, and the noise is still very minimal.
 

Aapje

Golden Member
Mar 21, 2022
1,467
2,031
106
It's kinda funny, but on the eVGA cards I have, I like the OC BIOS because the fan profiles are more aggressive. The card runs a bit cooler and faster, and the noise is still very minimal.

You can set a custom fan profile with MSI afterburner. No need to choose an OC BIOS.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |