- Sep 28, 2005
- 20,878
- 3,230
- 126
That's a decent drop from the 1.26 it takes my 980X.
currently she's at 4.378 @ 1.31 vcore passing linX :ninja:
That's a decent drop from the 1.26 it takes my 980X.
currently she's at 4.378 @ 1.31 vcore passing linX :ninja:
Guys i have got the 990X sample from my sponsor.
Does that mean we can take the 980X you had off your hands for say $30? :awe:
Does that mean we can take the 980X you had off your hands for say $300? :awe:
Getting a cpu from Aigo after he's had his way with it is like dating an ex-girlfriend of Ron Jeremy...its been so used and abused by this point that you'd be lucky if that LGA1366 chip would actually fit into a LGA2011 board
Main effect of this: All the people who bought the i7-980X will be upset that they no longer have the best
i heard these chips do 4+ on air @ like a a sick 1.2 vcore.
Which is why i really want one.. but i cant let greed take over or i will lose 2011.
currently she's at 4.378 @ 1.31 vcore passing linX :ninja:
Getting a cpu from Aigo after he's had his way with it is like dating an ex-girlfriend of Ron Jeremy...its been so used and abused by this point that you'd be lucky if that LGA1366 chip would actually fit into a LGA2011 board
lulz..
the 980X already has flags claiming it from butfungulio and back.
the 990X is a monster.
I cant post anything yet.
But i was playing with it.
@ stock she does 1.19v @ 3.4
with light oc and playing she pulled 4ghz @ 1.2
With more playing and more light voltage, she did 4.3 @ 1.31v
Ummm, get ready for new records, this cpu will break them, in single cpu catigory.
SR-2, well as they say, it takes 2 to tango~
How high is Dan's chip hitting? ():biggrin:
clocks on air.
yes u heard me correct... A I R
clocks on air.
yes u heard me correct... A I R
Right, and I'm sure it's perfectly stable.
My 980X shows a stepping of 2 and a revision of B1. Same as above.
Why aren't you using hyperthreading?
I heard the 32 nm chips shouldn't really go over 1.4 V though.