That looks good to me, but where is that all going to end up, when the rumored GTX 1660 Super drops, with GDDR6? That might shake up the NVidia pricing, and make the RX 5500/5600 series look less competitive.
That looks good to me, but where is that all going to end up, when the rumored GTX 1660 Super drops, with GDDR6? That might shake up the NVidia pricing, and make the RX 5500/5600 series look less competitive.Anyway, here we go:
RX 5600 XT - 24 CUs, 8 GB GDDR6 - $250, GTX 1660 Ti performance. 4 GB version at $229.
RX 5600 - 22 CUs, 8 GB GDDR6 - 199$, GTX 1650 Ti performance. 4 GB version at $179.
RX 5500 - 20 CUs, 3 GB GDDR6 - $149, GTX 1650 performance
The same way Navi 10 was performing slightly slower or around GTX 1660 Ti in leaked benchmarks.The leaked Benchmarks are not giving me a warm feeling. According to the leaks Navi 14 is performing anywhere from the same as the RX 570 to (slightly) faster than RX 590. The most recent rumors claim Navi 14 will be a 128bit card with 8GB GDDR6 which again makes me hesitant. 128bit bus will have a hard time keeping the GPU fed.
On the logical side, AMD is simply not so dumb as to bring out a new card that performs the same as the old one. I expect the top end release version performs better than the RX 590 while being cooler and more power efficient. Of course AMD has disappointed me before...
Anyway, here we go:
RX 5600 XT - 24 CUs, 8 GB GDDR6 - $250, GTX 1660 Ti performance. 4 GB version at $229.
RX 5600 - 22 CUs, 8 GB GDDR6 - 199$, GTX 1650 Ti performance. 4 GB version at $179.
RX 5500 - 20 CUs, 3 GB GDDR6 - $149, GTX 1650 performance
The fact that Nvidia readies GTX 1660 Super, with 14 Gbps GDDR6 should tell you guys, how good is Navi 14 performing.That looks good to me, but where is that all going to end up, when the rumored GTX 1660 Super drops, with GDDR6? That might shake up the NVidia pricing, and make the RX 5500/5600 series look less competitive.
Navi 21 = 80CU 7nm+, ray-tracing with HBM
Navi 23 = 102CU 7nm+, ray tracing with HBM
Which of the big Navi?but the rumors were apparently true that Big Navi uses something different than midrange Navi.
Assuming their are three (big, bigger, & biggest I think was your name for them) certainly the 2080 TI competitor (biggest) and probably the one below it (bigger). Probably not the 5800 (big) as rumor has that launching in October at the same time as Navi 14 and the reading I'm getting is RDNA 2 cards all come in 2020.Which of the big Navi?
I feel like AMD is trying to shame me into buying the 5700, or 5800 when it arrives.
Back in the days of the HD 5000 Series (2009), the 5800 Cards were for the hard core gamers while the 5700 series were for the budget gamers. The launch MSRP of the 5870 was $380 while the 5850 was $260. The 5770 was a relatively cheap $160. They also had the 5670 at $99, but those folks weren’t even allowed to call themselves gamers.
Fast forward to today and the budget gamer cards, the 5700 series, are a whopping $400 (5700 HD) and $350 (5700). If we’re lucky the low end 5600 cards (for people who don’t deserve to call themselves gamers) will only be $250 while the real “Mainstream gamer” cards, the 5800, will be heaven knows what.
I realize it’s just a name and what really matters is performance. The 5600 will be optimized for 1080p gamers while the 5700 is 1440p and the 5800 will target the 4k crowd. The logical part of my brain gets that. It’s the illogical part that is embarrassed to say I’m interested in the 5600 series.
Am I the only one?
Scott Herkelman recently said that they want to finally have a meaningful and stable naming convention for their cards. This, paired with recent rumors, point towards 5300, 5500 and 5700 (maybe also a 5900) as the full lineup as opposed to 5600 and 5800.
3,5,7,9 tiering as it is with Intel CPUs, AMD CPUs, BMW cars and so on...
I'm just not seeing it. We have 5700 already. That means their is room for only one more higher series, the 5900, unless we go even bigger to a 11000 (OMG, AMD turned it up to 11!).Scott Herkelman recently said that they want to finally have a meaningful and stable naming convention for their cards. This, paired with recent rumors, point towards 5300, 5500 and 5700 (maybe also a 5900) as the full lineup as opposed to 5600 and 5800.
3,5,7,9 tiering as it is with Intel CPUs, AMD CPUs, BMW cars and so on...
And besides that... we have the current lineup of 3200, 3400, 3600, 3700, 3800, 3900 lines, plus a supposed 3500. There is absolutely room for a 5800, 5900, 5600, 5500. Doubt they'd do a 5200 or 5400 since their corresponding chips are APUs.I'm just not seeing it. We have 5700 already. That means their is room for only one more higher series, the 5900, unless we go even bigger to a 11000 (OMG, AMD turned it up to 11!).
I think they'll keep it in line as they have, 5600, 5700, 5800, etc.
We already have 5300XT advertisedAnd besides that... we have the current lineup of 3200, 3400, 3600, 3700, 3800, 3900 lines, plus a supposed 3500. There is absolutely room for a 5800, 5900, 5600, 5500. Doubt they'd do a 5200 or 5400 since their corresponding chips are APUs.
Yes RDNA2 but I will probably make some minor changes to my lineup based on new info from videocardz/wccftech and moores law dead youtube video, but I want confirmation first. Might post it anyway as videocardz is very reliable.Are these using RDNA v2?
Oh man, that's a tough decision. I was facing something similar, I had just purchased at the beginning of last month, an MSI Ventus GTX 1660 ti for $270+tax, and then one showed up from a private seller, used, on ebay, for $210. I was like, "Hmm, cost averaging down? Get two total?". So I bought that one too, but I was late with the rent. In hindsight, not a great idea. But I did help out the DC TeAm for the PrimeGrid race, we nabbed 3rd-place (not because of me, but because of the whole team, but I made a decent contribution this time around, with a pair of new GPUs.)Here I am staring at an open-box PowerColor reference 5700 XT for $323... looking mighty appealing since I don't care much about noise under load. But I keep telling myself- wait! There is a price war looming... hopefully!
Not worth it.Here I am staring at an open-box PowerColor reference 5700 XT for $323... looking mighty appealing since I don't care much about noise under load. But I keep telling myself- wait! There is a price war looming... hopefully!
Would a 2060 Super for $323 be worth it? Why isn't a 5700XT Reference worth it?Not worth it.
Reference very bad, hot, loud, bad reviews for reference 5700xt. I don't see why its a good idea. Black Friday is not too far, one could probably get a good custom card for this price around that time.
And now it appears that there might... not be RX 5600 series... Only 5500.
For sure RX 5500 XT has been leaked, but also there is talk about RX 5500 and 5500M. 5500M has 1408 ALUs(22 CUs). And we know Navi 14 has 24 CUs as full design. Which gives hope that RX 5500 XT, which will come with only 8 GB configs, looking at the leaks, at least from Gigabyte, will be full design, with 1536 ALUs.
I have to tell you guys. If AMD will NOT sell full die on desktop, I will pass on it, no matter how good value it will be. Im tired of being as a consumer milked by companies.
I am willing to pay. I don't expect miracles(like: Between GTX 1660 Ti and RTX 2060 performance for 199$). I just want product as good as it can be for the money they ask me for it.
1536 ALUs, 128 bit GDDR6, 4/8 GB(does not matter to me) for 249$, with performance equal to GTX 1660 Ti, but more efficient. That is all Im asking for.
The PowerColor plain RX 5700 XT (AIB, dual fan) is $339. That there's a good deal. Plus 3 games and 3 months Xbox Game Pass.Reference very bad, hot, loud, bad reviews for reference 5700xt. I don't see why its a good idea. Black Friday is not too far, one could probably get a good custom card for this price around that time.