Interesting. I wonder if they are based on the 12nm dies used for the RX 590. Although, I think that the RX 580 and RX 590 have the same number of SPs? I wonder what AMD has been doing with the "cut"/disabled CU dies from 12nm RX 590 production.Just saw also on vidcardz that MSI and XFX have brought out new/revised RX 580 designs. Navi shortages perhaps?
Since it said MSI and XFX rather than AMD that implies the same GPU, just a different board & cooling design. I'll bet they're just moving to a different (ie, cheaper) board and cooling design to make manufacturing cost lower so they can keep selling those guys. The 580/570 we're good chips and certainly have some life left in them, especially in less rich nations.Interesting. I wonder if they are based on the 12nm dies used for the RX 590. Although, I think that the RX 580 and RX 590 have the same number of SPs? I wonder what AMD has been doing with the "cut"/disabled CU dies from 12nm RX 590 production.
I've speculated in the past that we should see an "RX 575" card, based on these dies, basically a 12nm souped-up RX 570 card, just like the RX 590 was a 12nm souped-up RX 580 card.
The MSI models appear to both have smaller heatsinks with the Armor version using a die cast version. First time I've seen this in a GPU with such a high TBP rating.Since it said MSI and XFX rather than AMD that implies the same GPU, just a different board & cooling design. I'll bet they're just moving to a different (ie, cheaper) board and cooling design to make manufacturing cost lower so they can keep selling those guys. The 580/570 we're good chips and certainly have some life left in them, especially in less rich nations.
Benefits of 12nm dies not clocked right to the edge like RX 590? Maybe someone should test the temps / power usage, of these "new RX 580" models. Probably a significant improvement, if they can work on a "die-cast" (or extruded) heatsink.The MSI models appear to both have smaller heatsinks with the Armor version using a die cast version. First time I've seen this in a GPU with such a high TBP rating.
The numbers look good. Very promising. Now if they’d just release the thing in retail...Some RX 5500 (OEM) benchmarks have gotten out, just behind the RX 580 (OC) & 1660 (OC). Also power consumption at 133W for the 5500.
I must be blind, but I don't see the GPU clock speed on the heise.de page
I can see the GDDR6 speed, but not the GPU clock...
I DON'T think this is the RX5500, but rather the RX5300 (1448 MHz part) and hence, HP labeled it correctly.
Can anyone confirm the GPU clock speed?
Is that the 4gb or 8gb model? Because i don't see a reason to get a 5500 4gb if RX 580 8gb is available for less with double vram while still being faster.Some RX 5500 (OEM) benchmarks have gotten out, just behind the RX 580 (OC) & 1660 (OC). Also power consumption at 133W for the 5500.
AMD Radeon RX 5500 (OEM) Tested, Almost As Fast as RX 580
German publication Heise.de got its hands on a Radeon RX 5500 (OEM) graphics card and put it through their test bench. The numbers yielded show exactly what caused NVIDIA to refresh its entry-level with the GeForce GTX 1650 Super and the GTX 1660 Super. The RX 5500, in Heise's testing was found...www.techpowerup.com
Where do you have reviews of RX 5500?Zotac GeForce GTX 1650 Super Review
Zotac's GTX 1650 Super Twin Fan is only 16 cm long, which makes it a great choice for an SFF system or media PC. The card still offers plenty of gaming performance, exceeding the Radeon RX 580. Overclocking potential is outstanding; we managed to unlock over 10% in additional real-life performance.www.techpowerup.com
Performance of both cards. The RX 5500 is significantly behind the gtx 1660 and far behind the gtx 1660 super. Nvidia is making this a tough launch for the rx 5500 with the launch of the gtx 1650 super. With the GTX 1650 super's overclocking potential and existing competitiveness and pricing vs the rx 5500, it is no wonder AMD is stealth launching the rx 5500 for the time being.
They cannot sell 4GB GPU in 2019 for more than 170$/€.So it looks like we’ve essentially pinned down the performance for the 5500, just behind the RX 580. The question now becomes price. The cheapest RX 580 on newegg is $160 while the cheapest GTX 1650 is $150 (which the 5500 significantly outperforms). AMD compared the 5500 to the GTX 1650 in their promo docs which tells me its price will be around $150(ish).
The 580, besides being a bit faster, has 8GB of VRAM vs the 4GB on the 5500, while the 5500 is uses significantly less power at load than the 580. Personally I think that’s a pretty good deal. It definitely raises the bar at the low end.
Where do you have reviews of RX 5500?
The review of the RX 5500 is based on OEM GPU, with no optimized drivers.
What makes you believe they are not based on the Heise.de review?