[Rumor (Various)] AMD R7/9 3xx / Fiji / Fury

Page 20 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

exar333

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2004
8,518
8
91
A few dollars worth of sleeving would fix that if you don't care for the look of the tubes.

True.

If you compare to the H100 cooler, these tubes looks slightly smaller. The H100 is 6mm ID, I wonder if this is ~5mm ID (~1/5'')? It is also possible they are not very thick and ID is similar, but hopefully these are at least decently-built.
 

RussianSensation

Elite Member
Sep 5, 2003
19,458
765
126
Clock speeds; everyone always forgets clock speeds. GM200 custom models should easily hit 1.4-1.5 GHz at least with, what, 1.15-1.2 GHz boost speeds even on stock reference designs? If Fiji's anything like the 285 and 290X, it won't overclock to nearly the same level as easily (average for those is where, about 1.1-1.15 GHz?).

I don't think you've been following the posts on Fiji for the last 6 months on this sub-forum if you are making statements how gamers here forgot about clocks. One of the major things we have repeatedly talked about is how even if Fiji beats the 980Ti / Titan X by 5%, 980Tis overclock 20%+ and do so at a small penalty in power usage. So no one here is forgetting clock speeds at all, in fact the opposite. Many have predicted that even if Fiji beats the Titan X, with GM200's overclocking headroom, it could easily be the faster card in OC vs. OC scenarios, not to mention we also discussed the possibility of NV releasing a fully unlocked GM200 980Ti Black Edition with 1200mhz clocks by the fall.

If Fiji can't overclock well, 980Ti OC could easily win this contest since then are we are talking about getting 50% extra VRAM as a 'bonus.'


Gentle Typhoon confirmed then, more or less. Lack of braiding on the AIO CLC fan/tubes looks cheap though.

EVGA did a far better job with Hybrid 980/980Ti cards.

Since the Hybrid 980Ti costs $750, and it can hit 1.45-1.50Ghz boost clocks with overclocking, a Fiji XT that's only 5% faster than a reference 980Ti isn't going to fly for $850, unless it overclocks like mad.

Fiji is going to have to compete against custom 980Ti that boost to 1.3+ ghz out of box and OC to 1.45ghz boost.

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/gigabyte_geforce_gtx_980_ti_g1_gaming_soc_review,25.html

The competitor isn't Titan X, it's really a dud held back by the blower and overpriced. These custom 980Ti going for $699 that offer Titan X + 10% performance is the major threat.

That is one seriously impressive 980Ti. What many of us talked about is coming true:

1) Titan X will be obsoleted by a 980Ti and after-market 980Ti will beat the Titan X while running way cooler and quieter for $300 less - CHECK! (despite Titan X owners attacking many for suggesting the the TX was a rip-off from day 1 and most of us knew it!)

2) 980Ti reference is the card to skip for anyone not WC or running 3-4 of those as after-market 980Ti cards will crush it in performance, noise levels, temperatures and quality components for only $30-50 more - CHECK!

3) 980 at $550 was a giant rip-off for the last 9 months, just as many of us called it. An after-market 980Ti just crushes a 980 in demanding situations, it's not even close, yet 980 owners kept saying how waiting for GM200/Fiji wasn't worth waiting for...... right! - CHECK!








After-market $690 980Ti >>>> $1100 980 SLI in The Witcher 3 Another example why buying a single flagship card is often better than 2x mid-range chips.

Also note, nearly perfect scaling with overclocking (1477mhz vs. 1202 reference 980Ti card and here we see almost a 22% increase in performance). 2.8X faster than a 7970Ghz and 2.14X faster than a reference 780Ti, and 87.5% faster than an R9 290X - Just WOW!


*** I never recall any NV generation where they had a situation where no card between $330 and $650 was worth buying and the gap between the top cards (980Ti/TX) and the 2nd tier (980) was THIS massive. 980 really is a 560Ti/680 successor in Maxwell's stack and it's becoming more a more obvious based on how the 980Ti just crushes it. $499 for 980 is waaaaaaaay too much seeing these benches. The true potential of the 980Ti vs. 980 doesn't come out until GM200 is overclocked. At that point GM200's TMUs, ROP, CUDA core and memory bandwidth advantage shows up in spades!

4) AMD has a mountain to overcome - 6GB VRAM + 22-23% (1202mhz reference vs. 1477 Gigabyte G1 980Ti) overclocking in after-market 980Tis that cost $690, all while being able to turn off the fans at idle up to 60*C and power usage doesn't go up much for the 980Ti in overclocked states. This point could seal the fate of Fiji XT WCE.

I feel AMD needs to price Fiji PRO and Fiji XT air cooled very aggressively because I am starting to doubt Fiji XT WCE will beat the incredible performance of that 980Ti 1291mhz Boost card you just linked.

Also, a lot of NV AIBs have 3 year warranties, while a lot of AMD's have just 2 year (looking at you PowerColor and Sapphire). Extra year of warranty when spending $600+ could be a factor.


Welcome to AT TaintedSquirrel!

Thanks for your leaks. If XFX now only has Lifetime Warranty if bought from BestBuy, that's a big disappointment.

Must be fake but the radiator and fan are the same.

Detail oriented AIBs should jump on this immediately and use this as a differentiator. The non-sleeved fan connector looks bad on a $600+ videocard.
 
Last edited:

exar333

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2004
8,518
8
91
[snip]
*** I never recall any NV generation where they had a situation where no card between $330 and $650 was worth buying and the gap between the top cards (980Ti/TX) and the 2nd tier (980) was THIS massive. 980 really is a 560Ti/690 successor in Maxwell's stack and it's becoming more a more obvious based on how the 980Ti just crushes it. $499 for 980 is waaaaaaaay too much seeing these benches.

[snip]

Absolutely spot-on. Plus, 2x970 is ~980Ti anyway, so on the NV side a 'budget SLI' build still doesn't really make sense unless you already have a 970 and don't want to part with it.

If you have to/want NV, a single 970 for 1080P or a 980Ti for 1440P+ (or 2x980Ti on 4K) are your best bets. Either spend $330 or $650+. The 980 is just not worth buying at all, even without 39x and Fiji released.
 

flopper

Senior member
Dec 16, 2005
739
19
76
Absolutely spot-on. Plus, 2x970 is ~980Ti anyway, so on the NV side a 'budget SLI' build still doesn't really make sense unless you already have a 970 and don't want to part with it.

If you have to/want NV, a single 970 for 1080P or a 980Ti for 1440P+ (or 2x980Ti on 4K) are your best bets. Either spend $330 or $650+. The 980 is just not worth buying at all, even without 39x and Fiji released.

it went EOL the 980 once 980ti was priced at 650.
I just hope we dont get stuck with a midrange and then a really high end with no real middleground.
 

exar333

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2004
8,518
8
91
it went EOL the 980 once 980ti was priced at 650.
I just hope we dont get stuck with a midrange and then a really high end with no real middleground.

Agree.

Hoping Fiji pro may fill this gap. If it is positioned at $449-499 it could really fill a spot that is vacant right now and kill the 980 in performance (potentially). That is my hope.

$500 is the 'sweet spot' for pricing on my end; or go 2x for ~$1000....then I can still fork-out an extra $50-75 on a really nice custom version and stay at or below $600.00 for a single card.
 

pj-

Senior member
May 5, 2015
481
249
116
Dont know what to make of these rumors.
http://videocardz.com/56251/amd-radeon-300-fury-rumors-leaks

30 k fury and fury non-x cards only? Delayed fury cards? low yields on HBM they claim. Hard to imagine they've only managed ~120,000 good memory chips in so many months.

has the fury name even been confirmed? sighs

That does seem low but I have no idea how big the > $500 dgpu market is. If it's 100,000 a year, then 30k isn't all that bad.
 

bryanW1995

Lifer
May 22, 2007
11,144
32
91
In a nutshell, Nvidia wasn't upfront on the way they neutered the 970.
While it does have 4GB, it is actually split into 3.5GB & .5GB and that .5GB has magnitudes slower access than the 3.5GB.

Worse, it slows down the access to the rest of the memory.

oh , it does? I thought it was only when you access it. so, game < 3.5GB, you're fine

I read the first few pages of that "gtx 970 issues" thread...from what I was able to ascertain, they got to work on the drivers and now the card only slows down after you access that last .5gb. There was also an issue of RoP's I think... Though, as I said above, it's hard to be too mad at them considering that it has significantly outsold the r9 290 at a much higher price. If AMD had something that was competitive AND had similar heat/noise then jhh would have felt the damage in way that really matters to him: his wallet.

I'm guessing some reviewers are on these already.

Ha...I wonder if apoppin still has his web site...although I'm sure he wouldn't tell me anything, anyway, he's too much of a rule-follower.
 

MrTeal

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2003
3,587
1,748
136
Detail oriented AIBs should jump on this immediately and use this as a differentiator. The non-sleeved fan connector looks bad on a $600+ videocard.
The different trim levels could just be a way of AMD keeping track of different boards in the wild. The tubing looks very similar to that used by a lot of AIOs, especially the Coolit Eco units
 

Serandur

Member
Apr 8, 2015
38
0
6
I don't think you've been following the posts on Fiji for the last 6 months on this sub-forum if you are making statements how gamers here forgot about clocks. One of the major things we have repeatedly talked about is how even if Fiji beats the 980Ti / Titan X by 5%, 980Tis overclock 20%+ and do so at a small penalty in power usage. So no one here is forgetting clock speeds at all, in fact the opposite. Many have predicted that even if Fiji beats the Titan X, with GM200's overclocking headroom, it could easily be the faster card in OC vs. OC scenarios, not to mention we also discussed the possibility of NV releasing a fully unlocked GM200 980Ti Black Edition with 1200mhz clocks by the fall.

If Fiji can't overclock well, 980Ti OC could easily win this contest since then are we are talking about getting 50% extra VRAM as a 'bonus.'
That's not what I meant. I'm not talking about people forgetting clock speeds exist. I meant that people always forget what clock speed does (as a multiplier for shaders, TMUs, ROPs, and separately, memory).

Hence why Fiji would be at a disadvantage relative to GM200 in pixel fillrate if stuck with the same number of ROPs as you suggested. It's also the reason why general hype about memory bus width alone is faulty. For example, HBM1's 4096-bit bus sounds impressive, but low clock speeds curb the final bandwidth amount to no more than 2x that on Hawaii's preceeding 512-bit bus. The effect on the parts of the GPU core itself seems less understood though.
 
Last edited:

Head1985

Golden Member
Jul 8, 2014
1,866
699
136
Dont know what to make of these rumors.
http://videocardz.com/56251/amd-radeon-300-fury-rumors-leaks

30 k fury and fury non-x cards only? Delayed fury cards? low yields on HBM they claim. Hard to imagine they've only managed ~120,000 good memory chips in so many months.

has the fury name even been confirmed? sighs
30k is very low.
nv manage sell more than milion 970/980 in like 2 months..
Also pro version delayed?
 
Last edited:

RussianSensation

Elite Member
Sep 5, 2003
19,458
765
126
Brb not buying fiji because tubing isn't aesthetic enough..

hehe, not that bad but come one, hasn't anyone at AMD seen EVGA Hybrid 980? Hopefully those are just early review samples and not he final production version.

Dont know what to make of these rumors.
http://videocardz.com/56251/amd-radeon-300-fury-rumors-leaks

30 k fury and fury non-x cards only? Delayed fury cards? low yields on HBM they claim. Hard to imagine they've only managed ~120,000 good memory chips in so many months.

has the fury name even been confirmed? sighs

If some of the stuff in that post is true, AMD really screwed up. R9 390/390X look overpriced based on rumoured specs/performance considering after-market R9 290/290X at $220/$270 on Newegg right now. Not having Fiji PRO at launch would be a big loss imo as many gamers were hoping for a $499 card that would shake up the high-end without needing to spend $650.

Supply constrains are also worrying. If I were in the market for upgrading right now, there is almost no doubt I'd just order this awesome Gigabyte G1 980Ti. NV really did a remarkable timing job with the 980Ti. Not only did they take most of the hype out of AMD's sails after seeing incredible benchmark scores of 980Ti OC, but if they have supply issues, 6GB of VRAM, awesome overclocking and great power usage in overclocked states for GM200, that would push many gamers to just get the 980Ti after-market cards.
 

DiogoDX

Senior member
Oct 11, 2012
746
277
136
30k is very low.
nv manage sell more than milion 970/980 in like 2 months..
Also pro version delayed?
I don't think that 30K for a >$600 high end niche launch is very low. Just remember that AMD sell way less cards than Nvidia.
 

Despoiler

Golden Member
Nov 10, 2007
1,966
770
136
I don't think that 30K for a >$600 high end niche launch is very low. Just remember that AMD sell way less cards than Nvidia.

Agreed. The 970/980 are mid range cards. The Fury line is positioned as a high end line.

The only thing I'm concerned about is price gauging by retailers if they think the supply is constrained or if it actually is. If they price a $750 card @ $1000 similar to what they pulled with the 290/290x cards, I am going to lose it. Hopefully AMD has taken care of the issue this round of cards.
 

xthetenth

Golden Member
Oct 14, 2014
1,800
529
106
Agreed. The 970/980 are mid range cards. The Fury line is positioned as a high end line.

The only thing I'm concerned about is price gauging by retailers if they think the supply is constrained or if it actually is. If they price a $750 card @ $1000 similar to what they pulled with the 290/290x cards, I am going to lose it. Hopefully AMD has taken care of the issue this round of cards.

They probably can't gouge that hard. Gaming cards are mostly fungible in a way the best mining card during a bubble isn't fungible with pure gaming cards.
 

RussianSensation

Elite Member
Sep 5, 2003
19,458
765
126
I don't think that 30K for a >$600 high end niche launch is very low. Just remember that AMD sell way less cards than Nvidia.

That rumor says 30K for the entire year.

"AMD Radeon Fury X rumored to be limited to just 30,000 units for 2015"

NV sold 1 million GM204 chips in 2.5 months.

That's a disaster if true, way worse than mining demand. 30,000 units won't even move the market share much more than 0.1% because there are 9-12 million dGPUs sold per 1 quarter. If NV releases a $229 960Ti, drops 970 to $279, re-adjusts 980 to $399-429, AMD's $100-400 stack is going to be annihilated. NV isn't even sweating because they have a lot of room to cut prices and release a fully unlocked GM200 with higher clocks and this will basically to beat anything AMD has to offer in 2015. Plus, NV has been including great popular games with its game bundles. I don't know what AMD's management is really thinking. If there were going to name Fiji as Fury and not 300 series, they should have released R7-9 300 series January 1, 2015. If 390/390X barely improve perf/watt from 290/290X and they cost $300-450, one has to wonder what AMD has been doing for the last 1.5 years. Surely they could have re-spun Hawaii silicon and improved leakages, etc.
 
Last edited:

Despoiler

Golden Member
Nov 10, 2007
1,966
770
136
That rumor says 30K for the entire year.

"AMD Radeon Fury X rumored to be limited to just 30,000 units for 2015"

That's a disaster if true. 30,000 units won't even move the market share much more than 0.1% because there are 9-12 million dGPUs sold per 1 quarter. If NV releases a $229 960Ti, drops 970 to $279, re-adjusts 980 to $399-429, AMD's $100-400 stack is going to be annihilated. NV isn't even sweating because they have a lot of room to cut prices and release a fully unlocked GM200 with higher clocks and this will basically to beat anything AMD has to offer in 2015. Plus, NV has been including great popular games with its game bundles.

Maybe maybe not. AMD doesn't have a halo line of cards until now so any sales is better than no sales right? I also think that releasing the card is going to go a long way towards rolling back the slow, hot, power hungry perception. Fury cards are going to be on every single review from their release to the next gen of cards. AMD is ultimately getting killed right now just because of their reference cooler 290/290x debacle. Small steps to righting the ship so to speak.
 

utahraptor

Golden Member
Apr 26, 2004
1,053
199
106
I had a bad feeling we would not be getting anything tangible on the 16th. I guess it does not really matter to me since I am not building until skylake.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |