no plasmas bigger than 65 inches though. Enjoy your shit shadow-detail and motion blur.
Damn I was about to get a g1 too. Hmm... I'll see the launch reviews but maybe the -g1 is what I'll get.
So Gibbo over at OcUK have press version of the Fury X, and has this to say:
[snip]
Fury you can't clock the memory full stop and on stock voltage Fury does not clock well at all.
So it will all depend on how much more headroom Fury gets from some extra voltage but right now voltage is locked.
"Well my card is not what I'd class as an overclockers dream, locked memory, no voltage control, maybe only in my dreams.
Early days though yet, +100mv could make a vast improvement, but the card is so new so the current software available can only alter core clock."
[snip]
ultimately it simply makes far more sense to have DP and HDMI 1.4 to cover the vast majority of gamers. Partners will likely include HDMI to DVI adapters and HDMI 2 can come later.
There is not much to argue about lack of hdmi 2.0. In a nutshell it is stupid for AMD not to include it with latest cards and if you need hdmi 2.0 then amd cards is not for you.
There is not much to argue about lack of hdmi 2.0. In a nutshell it is stupid for AMD not to include it with latest cards and if you need hdmi 2.0 then amd cards is not for you.
For me the least of my cocerns is the lack of hdmi 2.0, but rather the VRAM. 4gb is being tapped at already and a few games( very few) want more. But I personally only think this VRAM limitation will only get worse
For me the least of my cocerns is the lack of hdmi 2.0, but rather the VRAM. 4gb is being tapped at already and a few games( very few) want more. But I personally only think this VRAM limitation will only get worse
Wow. I guess pc gaming isn't as flexible as I thought. I guess I should just get a console since pc gaming is only for desk man caves.
Steam machine, mini itx cases the size of consoles, Alienware alpha, steam in home streaming to tv, etc that all must be for more desktop gaming right?
Lol pc gamers are so rigid that they defeat the whole reason pc gaming is cool. Because it's flexible. Lol oh well typical
Yeah, it's same as discussing peformance per watt. Some or most people will not care, but it's good to know and interesting discussion point.
Or say ignorant things like 'PC gaming belongs in the office/man cave not in the living room'.
They're already out and have been out for awhile.... Its around 30 ms for most sets that are 4k 60"hz and native 120"hz at 1080p and every enthusiast already knows this..For me the jury is out until I see reviews that show the input lag of HDMI 2.0 on these TV's. I'm assuming it's going to be horrendous though until shown otherwise.
They're already out and have been out for awhile.... Its around 30 ms for most sets that are 4k 60"hz and native 120"hz at 1080p and every enthusiast already knows this..
More people console game than pc game on low 1 ms input monitors. Millions of people are ok with higher than 1-2 ms input lag. Get over it.
More people console game than pc game on low 1 ms input monitors. Millions of people are ok with higher than 1-2 ms input lag. Get over it.
I don't need HDMI 2.0, i need dual link DVI, which HDMI 2.0 would have given me had they included it.
They're already out and have been out for awhile.... Its around 30 ms for most sets that are 4k 60"hz and native 120"hz at 1080p and every enthusiast already knows this..
More people console game than pc game on low 1 ms input monitors. Millions of people are ok with higher than 1-2 ms input lag. Get over it.
You really think it's the same? lol