No it doesn't. By leaving out HDMI 2.0, they remove any possibility of it being used for 4k TV's and any possibility of HDMI to dual link DVI. They basically alienated anyone who uses a Korean panel or anyone wanting to use this as a 4K HTPC machine (what the hell is even the target audience for the Nano?), which is plenty of people who would be on the market for the Fury (myself included).
If they want to push forward with newer display connection technology, fine! but they didn't! all they did was remove a still widely used connector, and didn't replace it with one that some video cards have already had for a year or more, that would have given backwards compatibility with duallink DVI. doesn't make any goddamned sense at all. I really wanted to get a fury, but now I can't, because I'm running an Overlord X270OC which is DVI only. For a company that's already reeling, cutting out possible customers this way is the dumbest thing I can imagine.
It's really rather funny, since the biggest knock against including DL-DVI is that the connectors take up a huge amount of space on the back of the card and obstruct airflow. With Hawaii about 2/3 of the backplate is obstructed, and if AMD wanted to include two (or three) DP outputs in addition to HDMI and DL_DVI almost the entire back would have been blocked off.
For Fury X though, who cares? The entire second half of the bracket is just a blank plate; there would have been plenty of room for the standard stacked two DL-DVI connectors in addition to four ports on there now.
I can understand not updating to HDMI2.0. I don't think it's the right move but that would have required tweaking that block from Hawaii/Tonga and if cutting it pulled in schedule or something, fair enough. Not including a DVI port is just silly though.