Originally posted by: mwmorph
Originally posted by: fleabag
Originally posted by: mwmorph
I'm pretty sure, the ES350 doesn't have brake by wire so you have a direct, physical connection to the master cylinder and thus the brakes.
The brakes on a car, are always at least 3x as powerful as the engine, average of about 4x and on some performance cars, 5x. Even if the car was WOT in drive, you could push the brakes down and stop.
As for any car with Drive by wire, even then, there is no car that will not allow brakes to be used when the accelerator is being pressed. There are failsafes, backups and backups of failsafes backups for those cars because the brakes are by far the mot important part of your vehicle.
Standard procedure is to drop the car into neutral or a lower gear and apply the brakes or e-brakes.
For a situation like this to occur, you would need 2 brake lines to be physically cut (1 is not enough to lose all brakes on a modern car), the accelerator stuck in WOT and the transmission malfunctioning to shift even into neutral.
The most likely explanation is the floormats depressed the accelerator and prevented the brakes from being pressed down. More likely, unfortunately is that problem exists between Steering Wheel and chair. Something like floor mat shifting caused it, panic set in and all the wrong decisions were made (or morel likely, panic induced inhibition). That or he did it for some unknown reason like a few years ago when a BMW 318i driver a few years ago in Great Britain.
It's funny that you say that because my dad said the same thing years ago when I inquired to him what to do if your car has a stuck accelerator. This is clearly bullshit though because even though I'm familiar with using cars that don't have power brakes (engine is off, brakes already been used 3 times+ so all vacuum is gone) when I was braking this car, it really felt like I had no power brakes (even though I did) and STILL the car continued to accelerate! THE ONLY WAY ONE COULD HAVE STOPPED THE CAR WAS TO EITHER PUT IT IN NEUTRAL OR FIX THE THROTTLE ISSUE.
Properly functioning brakes will NEVER EVER have any trouble stopping a car at WOT. It's just physics. You could have 7" brake discs, single piston calipers and organic brake pads and it would still out brake out a 4.6L Ford Mustang engine producing a respectable 315hp.
A Toyota Supra turbo has 1200hp worth of braking a 1987 Porsche 911Carerra has 1100hp a Lexus LS400 has 1000hp worth of decel, a SC400? 900hp. There is no physically possible way to build a car with weaker brakes than engines unless you actually try to design it specifically for that purpose.
Try ti next time, time your 0-60 time. Then time your 60-0 time. Which one is shorter?
A 996 Turbo can do 0-100 in 9.4 seconds and 100-0 in 4.3.
A Suburu Impreza Sti does 13.77 to 100mph and 4.25 back to 0.
A Civic Si does 16.02 to 100 and 4.64 to 0.
A Chrysler Crossfire does 17.3 to 100, 4.47 to 0.
Hell even your average family sedan like a Honda Accord 4 cylinder will do 0-100 in ~19-21 seconds and 100-0 between 4.6-5.5.
BMW has always been criticized for fitting weak brakes for the car's level of performance (a common joke is that is' Bavarian Motor Works, not Brake Works) and a E46 323i can still doe 0-100 in 19.93 while 100-0 in 5.16.
Do you know how long it takes a Bugatti Veyron with 1001+hp to reach 100mph? 5.5 seconds. You know how quickly it stops? 3.4 seconds.
Besides what are you talking about with your story?
Did you have a runaway acceleration on a car?
The brakes felt unassisted (as in a catastrophic failure in the brake booster?)
The brake pedal didn't move at all? (you were probably pressing the ACCELERATOR then)
The pedal had high resistance but some braking occurred?
99% of that issue would be driver error, the other 1% would be because of brake system failure. There is NO CAR IN THE WORLD TODAY, not the Tata Nano, not some chinese car, not a go kart that has a engine more powerful than the brakes.
Seeing from the general quality of your posts, I'd probably chalk it up as user error. You probably don't even know what kind of brake fluid your car uses, much less how brakes work.
You know why? Because the chances of having both the accelerator and brakes suddenly catastrophically fail at exactly the same time is about as high as a random person ever climbing mount Everest. That's why the 1980s Audi thing was found out later was user error. So was the 2003 or 2005 BMW thing.
As for your car not having stronger brakes than the engine, the chances of that? Exactly 0.0%.