The Russians can't easily build a surface combatant larger than a corvette and had to got hat in hand to the North Koreans for artillery ammunition and missiles. The. North. Koreans.
Yes, the US arms industry is vastly larger and better than Russia's. Producing superior and more capable arms and munitions. The Ukrainians fought the Russians to a standstill with 30 year old hand me downs.
I think the Ukrainians would argue it is about winning and securing the territory they were guaranteed in writing multiple times by Russia and the west.
The Russians can get ammunition and other small weapons from its allies because the entire West is funding and arming Ukraine. Even the small NATO countries are sending whatever few weapons they have. The Brits have probably emptied out their warehouses by now.
So the North Koreans apparently have a large stockpile, so why not? America seems to want to use Ukraine as a proxy to go after Russia so Russia can look at its allies for weapons too. Don't see a big deal.
Russia has "only achieved minor territorial gains," but its ability to replace tanks means it doesn't need to slow offensives, the UK MOD said.
www.businessinsider.com
Even the UK says that Russia is building 100 tanks a month, which is huge compared to the West. Can Ukraine deal with this given its exhausted troops and low stockpiles of weapons? The article is biased by assuming that Russia cares a lot of territory. It does but only the Russian speaking regions and Crimea. I have yet to see any desire for them to expand much further West.
But you have to admit that the sanctions were a flop in hurting the Russian economy too much. It seemed to have hurt the Western Europeans more I think considering how unpopular their governments are. I think people there are tired of this Ukraine war and want to end the funding. Could be wrong though.
As far as the US arms industry, I think you are overexaggerating its abilities. They are hurting badly in many ways, especially with Patriot missiles, artillery rounds and other things that the Ukrainians need. America spends the most by far in its military but that doesn't translate to a lot of success. This is all without even factoring in China, Iran and other supposed enemy states which have huge stockpiles. America is behind in developing hypersonic missiles compared to Russia and China and possibly even Iran. It may have the most aircraft carriers but what good are they when they can't get too close to land due to the threat of hypersonic missiles?
I appreciate your response, it's good to have a dialogue even though we can all disagree on certain things.