A ship is a ship and they all cost Vlad money, but I wish they'd hit higher and more important ships.
Ukrainian military says it sank a Russian landing ship in the Black Sea
The Caesar Kunikov amphibious ship sank near Alupka, a city on the southern edge of the Crimean Peninsula, Ukrainian military reports.apnews.com
this is how you starve Crimea of resources once you take out the bridge........A ship is a ship and they all cost Vlad money, but I wish they'd hit higher and more important ships.
Ukrainian military says it sank a Russian landing ship in the Black Sea
The Caesar Kunikov amphibious ship sank near Alupka, a city on the southern edge of the Crimean Peninsula, Ukrainian military reports.apnews.com
A ship is a ship and they all cost Vlad money, but I wish they'd hit higher and more important ships.
Ukrainian military says it sank a Russian landing ship in the Black Sea
The Caesar Kunikov amphibious ship sank near Alupka, a city on the southern edge of the Crimean Peninsula, Ukrainian military reports.apnews.com
Ok it’s dumber than I thought. Really recycling the bad Soviet ideas full time eh.
Your reply seems to be a strange read on "they must be given".I am unaware of the USA or any nation giving nuclear weapons to any countries. I thought that all nations with nuclear weapons had developed them themselves. Um, perhaps with a "little help?" But I'm unaware of that.
That was my first thought. I'm really, really scared now. /s Orbits are really predictable and very detectable.Ok it’s dumber than I thought. Really recycling the bad Soviet ideas full time eh.
- Correct, the US militarily defeated the Taliban government in Kabul within weeks, and drove the Taliban out of the country relegating it to hit and run + IED attacks for 20+ years. Mind you, this is a landlocked country on the other side of the world, not even a country we share a 1000 mile border with like Russia does with Ukraine.
The US was not waging pitched battles for territory a year into the Afghan conflict, or in Iraq 2... or even in Iraq 1. All of the established governments fell within a month of two, and the US gained military supremacy over the entire country within that time.
The Taliban will not agree to an extension of the evacuation mission from Afghanistan and is “warning of consequences” if it is prolonged beyond its deadline.
The move would mean “extending occupation” and that is “a red line”, Suhail Shaheen, a member of the Taliban delegation in Doha, the capital of Qatar, said on Monday.
lol the cope is so strong. It’s ok bud, if you need a hug just let me know.Defeated the Taliban within weeks, but continue to get attacked by the Taliban for the next 20 years.
😅
Anyone remember when the Taliban gave the US a deadline to get out of the country?
Taliban warns of ‘consequences’ if US delays withdrawal
US president to decide on extension of August 31 withdrawal deadline as Taliban warns against ‘extending occupation’.www.aljazeera.com
How is it possible that a ‘defeated’ military is making these kinds of demands while US troops are still present? Kind of makes you wonder who was really in charge of Afghanistan doesn’t it?
But if you guys want to convince yourself that the NATO won this war, go right ahead if it makes you feel better.
By the way, they killed 13 US service members on their way out. That’s what ‘winning’ looks like.
If the US had gained ‘military supremacy’, they’d still be there. The US got its ass handed to them over 20 years so they decided to take their ball and go home. Guess all those fancy planes, ships and tanks couldn’t defeat an army of illiterate goat herders. Says a lot about the strength of NATO.
Defeated the Taliban within weeks, but continue to get attacked by the Taliban for the next 20 years.
😅
Anyone remember when the Taliban gave the US a deadline to get out of the country?
Taliban warns of ‘consequences’ if US delays withdrawal
US president to decide on extension of August 31 withdrawal deadline as Taliban warns against ‘extending occupation’.www.aljazeera.com
How is it possible that a ‘defeated’ military is making these kinds of demands while US troops are still present? Kind of makes you wonder who was really in charge of Afghanistan doesn’t it?
But if you guys want to convince yourself that the NATO won this war, go right ahead if it makes you feel better.
By the way, they killed 13 US service members on their way out. That’s what ‘winning’ looks like.
If the US had gained ‘military supremacy’, they’d still be there. The US got its ass handed to them over 20 years so they decided to take their ball and go home. Guess all those fancy planes, ships and tanks couldn’t defeat an army of illiterate goat herders. Says a lot about the strength of NATO.
This could really boomerang on Vlad. No one has discredited his army more than he has!Such a great place to live ....
Putin signs law to confiscate assets of those convicted of discrediting the Russian army
The catch-22 is that telling the truth is considered discrediting the Army. I.,e., saying that russia has between 100 and 200 thousand kia and wounded would be consider discrediting the army under Russia weird form of logic. Really bizzare place but what do you expect from a place that can shoot you in the head for well just about anything including taking a piss.Such a great place to live ....
Putin signs law to confiscate assets of those convicted of discrediting the Russian army
ABC|12 hours ago
Russian President Vladimir Putin has signed a law that will allow authorities to confiscate money, valuables and other assets from people convicted of spreading "deliberately false information" about ...
Defeated the Taliban within weeks, but continue to get attacked by the Taliban for the next 20 years.
😅
Anyone remember when the Taliban gave the US a deadline to get out of the country?
Taliban warns of ‘consequences’ if US delays withdrawal
US president to decide on extension of August 31 withdrawal deadline as Taliban warns against ‘extending occupation’.www.aljazeera.com
How is it possible that a ‘defeated’ military is making these kinds of demands while US troops are still present? Kind of makes you wonder who was really in charge of Afghanistan doesn’t it?
But if you guys want to convince yourself that the NATO won this war, go right ahead if it makes you feel better.
By the way, they killed 13 US service members on their way out. That’s what ‘winning’ looks like.
If the US had gained ‘military supremacy’, they’d still be there. The US got its ass handed to them over 20 years so they decided to take their ball and go home. Guess all those fancy planes, ships and tanks couldn’t defeat an army of illiterate goat herders. Says a lot about the strength of NATO.
There's a middle ground with NATO nuclear umbrella/ nuclear sharing. This was done to prevent nuclear proliferation. This means nuclear attack on non-nuclear NATO members result in retaliation from nuclear armed members. There's also US nuclear weapons in other countries and the aircraft of those nations can carry US weapons.I am unaware of the USA or any nation giving nuclear weapons to any countries. I thought that all nations with nuclear weapons had developed them themselves. Um, perhaps with a "little help?" But I'm unaware of that.
Someone once brought up a good point about this though. Maybe the reason why Hitler was antisemitic was that throughout his life time travelers kept showing up and trying to kill him saying ‘this is to save the Jews’ or whatever.Was just thinking, I must have heard a thousand variations of this “thought experiment” : If you had a time machine would you go back and kill Hitler?
Though all anyone right now has is this device going forward in time one second per second. Ish. Eh what can you do.
Was just thinking, I must have heard a thousand variations of this “thought experiment” : If you had a time machine would you go back and kill Hitler?
Though all anyone right now has is this device going forward in time one second per second. Ish. Eh what can you do.