There is still PBS Newshour, Frontline...and 60 Minutes is still pretty good, but I rarely watch it. But man...there isn't much after that as far as TV real-world information goes.
Print journalism still exists! But few really digest that online, I think? Maybe I'm wrong about that, but I get the feeling most people read aggregators...which doesn't mean they are all bad, it's just they are still aggregators, so more filters applied in certain ways.
I think people digest primary sources less and less these days, which is the underlying issue. And often, primary sources doesn't mean first reported. In fact, that's rarely true, because that isn't journalism. Primary source = the historical record. The story that establishes the known history of an event, takes time and as every human that has ever lived knows, nothing you have experienced in life, when it comes to complex life or news events, has ever been "known" within the first hours or even days, sometimes weeks.
So, the long-form journalism that always requires weeks and years of investigation to uncover and properly document a real event, are being less-read or even, really, less-produced.
Now that I think about it, Vice media does do good work in this. But again, so much buried behind subscription services. Primary information sources need to be free, untrained to profit: e.g., Frontline, but more widely known and commonly digested.