K1052
Elite Member
- Aug 21, 2003
- 46,862
- 34,808
- 136
The US is gonna make a fucking fortune off Putin's misstep.
South Koreans going to do real well too. They can produce large quantities of sophisticated arms quickly.
The US is gonna make a fucking fortune off Putin's misstep.
The Poles are buying enough arms to show themselves to Moscow if Putin decides to attack. The below is in addition to their rather large domestic weapons procurements.
Lately they have ordered (at least):
500 M142 HIMARS trucks (and related munitions including ATACMS)
1000 K2 tanks
700 K9 155mm SPHs
32 F-35s
50 FA-50s
250 M1A2 Abrams SEPv3 tanks
6 Patriot batteries
An undisclosed quantity of Javelins.
and now:
I worry Poland is over purchasing.
They need to deal with a refugee crisis, economy was not that great pre-war, and they are NATO members.
None of that will matter if Russia kicks it off with them, but short of that I would argue they need to think about social issues and spending.
When I was younger, I always wanted something like that mounted under the hood of my car to remove left lane cruisers. Now, everyone drives like shit in all lanes, so it just doesn't matter.That 30mm autocannon sounds nasty
Few years back I had seen concepts for Wide Area Mine (WAM). It had a canister that would be shot a few feet into the air and then forms an EFP towards the target. This allowed the density of the field to be much lighter since they could reach further and they were smart and integrated with each other. The mines would talk to each other and figure which one had the best shot so they all didn't go after the same target. Something like this but smaller.Next US aid package
View attachment 67301
Artillery fired anti-tank mines is a new one I think.
Ukrainians appear to be cranking though the AGM-88s which would explain the wide operation of many Ukrainian drones above the Russians in Kherson.
That 30mm autocannon sounds nasty
Something like the "handheld" gatling guns from Predator?Ukrainian vehicle but Russian gun, what you see and hear is 30x165mm. The NATO / STANAG equivalent is a little spicier, 30x173mm. That's what the A-10 uses. A guy named Bob Stewart made an experimental rifle chambered in it.
Over the shoulder, good call
The issue is that the izium salient that has been trying to put UA's forces in a pocket will be without support. Kupyansk is the railway (in black) hub of the region and either they defend it or the izium front will have to fall back at least to the eastern branch of the railway
The railway follows a large lake and the only way out seems to be the railway to Lyschansk that, however, is not in full control. The evacuation route would follow dangerously the frontline.
Something like the "handheld" gatling guns from Predator?
I worry Poland is over purchasing.
They need to deal with a refugee crisis, economy was not that great pre-war, and they are NATO members.
None of that will matter if Russia kicks it off with them, but short of that I would argue they need to think about social issues and spending.
This is a good breakdown. Thanks for posting.Found some interesting discussions about Kupiansk. Also with nice maps. I like maps too
View attachment 67336
On troops retreating from Izium;
View attachment 67337
Both quotes and images from this thread.
To give an idea on the logistics network that Russia is so dependent on;
View attachment 67338
From this tweet.
You can clearly see how important Kupiansk is for control over the western rail network.
Russia is in a very very hard place now.