<< Hey, the Russians have every right to request a second gold medal! The IOC and the ISU opened this bag of worms when they incorrectly awarded a set of gold medals to the Canadiens, why not the Russians? For those of you that have actually read how close the scoring was, the Russians actually have a point. Oh, and all you people that supported the Canadiens and are now bashing the Russians can just shut the hell up now. Your credibility and arguments are ruined.
--Ben >>
The Sale/Pelletier thing was not simply a case of "we should have won". There was actually admission of tampering in the judging process, which definitely should be considered. The Russian complaint is based on no facts, and ther supposed unfair judging (if it even happened, which I do not believe it did) would have only come about because of their own actions; coercing judges in the first place, and the negative reaction that could have followed. BTW, the reason that 2 golds were awarded in the pairs event was not simply "well, they were screwed, so let's just give them a gold too". After dismissing the French jude's vote (for obvious reasons of tampering), the scores were tied between the Canadians and the Russians. Usually this is avoided the the event by the fact that there are 9 judges, but by tossing one result out, it opened up the possibility of a tie. Whenever there is a true tie in the Olympics, both competitors get a gold medal. It is rare because of the circumstances required to achieve a tie, but it has happened before.