Russia wants '100% proof' N.Korea sunk ship

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

IndyColtsFan

Lifer
Sep 22, 2007
33,656
687
126
Lol, you're asking why we're trying to be diplomatic in one thing when we weren't in the other? Then you call us pussies for not trying to start world war 3? You're a moron.

AzN has shown he doesn't have a single logical thread in his body. What would the US have to gain by invading NK? Nothing -- the country is a worthless shithole with absolutely nothing to offer the world. If NK had resources which were important to the world economy or something like that, the US would've dispatched them long, long ago. As it stands, they have nothing but a bunch of mud huts, a crazy dictator, a brainwashed army, and disgusting, hypocritical sycophants like AzN who toes the party line and refuses to answer direct questions to him because he knows he is trolling. No one is that dense.
 

IndyColtsFan

Lifer
Sep 22, 2007
33,656
687
126
you are clueless: confirmed.

multiple bullet holes in jfk's limo not admitted by the government = proof of cover-up and a conspiracy. doctors who opereated on jfk are also on record (nova) saying jfk's wounds were altered after they initially operated on him. sup coverup!

gulf of tonkin: declassified docs and an admitted lie. why didn't you know?

oklahoma city: numerous news footage reports of john does and confiscated security cameras, which still are not being made public LOL. heavy evidence of coverup. sup liars!

overthrow of iran's democracy: admitted on the CIA's own website. lol at you for not knowing. ignorant much?

twa flight 800: too much evidence to list. even the government "witnesses" and twa employees are claiming cover-up. look it up ^^

9/11: too easy, but keep on denyin for your own peace of mind two words: norman mineta. wait here's another. wtc7.

mlk: jury finds us government and agencies guilty in mlk conspiracy. unanimous verdict LOL. king family rejoices. funny how the american media went silent again.

rkf: the mainstream media actually covered this one!: "new audio evidence emerges of possible rfk second shooter".

iraq 2: sup wmd liars!

Someone forgot to pick up a few rolls of tin foil for his hat collection last week.
 

al981

Golden Member
May 28, 2009
1,036
0
0
Idiot. The order of the court of law for the MLK thing was to hold AN OFFICIAL INVESTIGATION. And the results of said investigation were inconclusive.

As for the Iran thing. Nope, your right on that one and the torrin thing. I'm not trying to debate those I'm freely willing and able to admit that my knowledge on the history of those events was lacking.

More specifically I'm going after the above listed items. jfk. 9/11. mlk. oklahoma city. twa flight 800. . iraq 2 and trying to teach you what the word "admitted" means. As for people siding with you. Name one. I haven't seen them in this thread.

Your not giving me a link because you don't have one and can't get one.

so how does that crow taste, cogman? finally manned up and did your homework, eh? hahaha.
only took you 24 hours.

mlk: surprise surprise, the "new" investigation turned out "inconclusive."

the united states will admit to certain events, and flat out lie their asses off in others, as proven by jfk, mlk, etc. the jfk files are sealed for how many more decades? yeah, that's what i thought. either way, they have no credibility

also, i never said they were "all" admitted lies, but "all" of them include a tremendous amount of evidence which destroys the official version of events.

i've given you many detailed points to research on, so i'm not going to give you a link. if you're truly interested in finding out for yourself, then you'll do so.
 

al981

Golden Member
May 28, 2009
1,036
0
0
No credibility? If the US Government admitted to the overthrow of the Iranian government, that seems pretty honest and straight forward. I mean, they admitted it, right? That's got to be worth some credit.

admitted to overthrow iran after lying about it for how many decades?
 

KK

Lifer
Jan 2, 2001
15,903
4
81
You don't have the guts to ban him! :twisted:

You do not have the right to taunt moderators here and this is not your first or second time doing so. Enjoy your time off. We will.

Perknose
Forum Director


WTF??
 

jman19

Lifer
Nov 3, 2000
11,222
654
126
you are wrong, and i never said the us government admitted to all the events i listed.

reading comprehension failed you..

You put all these things in the same bucket of discussion, then called them admitted lies. You're trying to start crap through association, making you a trolling piece of crap.
 

al981

Golden Member
May 28, 2009
1,036
0
0
You put all these things in the same bucket of discussion, then called them admitted lies. You're trying to start crap through association, making you a trolling piece of crap.

then you failed at american history and reading comprehension. it should've been obvious some of the listed items were admitted lies which every american citizen should've known (yet certain posters still had no clue LOL), and others were not, but had tremendous evidence against the official version of events.

if you chose to group them all together as one, that is your problem. they were cited to show just how little credibility the us government has. interesting you took offense though! calling out the us government is easy!
 

IndyColtsFan

Lifer
Sep 22, 2007
33,656
687
126
translation: al981 likes to mouth off without providing any evidence. sucks to be him.

Fixed.

al981 said:
i love a clueless denier spouting nonsense when confronted with admitted lies

There is the claim you made. For each of the situations you mentioned, show a link from a reputable source where the US government admits it lied. The burden of proof is on you, not us, as we didn't make any of these claims.
 
Last edited:

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,251
8
0
al981, we can only have one idiot per thread and this one is taken by AzN so please start another thread with your drivel.
 

al981

Golden Member
May 28, 2009
1,036
0
0
There is the claim you made. For each of the situations you mentioned, show a link from a reputable source where the US government admits it lied. The burden of proof is on you, not us, as we didn't make any of these claims.

see post #85. again, you failed at reading comprehension. burden of proof for events the us government has already admitted to lying about? it's common knowledge. continue to remain ignorant son!
 

al981

Golden Member
May 28, 2009
1,036
0
0
al981, we can only have one idiot per thread and this one is taken by AzN so please start another thread with your drivel.

this coming from the 100% bush supporter for 8 years. hahaha.

speaking from experience bushjohn? you have no credibility either
 
Last edited:

IndyColtsFan

Lifer
Sep 22, 2007
33,656
687
126
see post #85. again, you failed at reading comprehension. burden of proof for events the us government has already admitted to lying about? it's common knowledge. continue to remain ignorant son!

See post 86.

The only person failing at reading comprehension is you. "Common knowledge" is not the same as the government admitting it lied, which is what you said. This isn't hard -- post links where the government admitted they lied about each and every incident you posted. If you can't, then you've been proven wrong. Thanks for playing.
 

al981

Golden Member
May 28, 2009
1,036
0
0
See post 86.

The only person failing at reading comprehension is you. "Common knowledge" is not the same as the government admitting it lied, which is what you said. This isn't hard -- post links where the government admitted they lied about each and every incident you posted. If you can't, then you've been proven wrong. Thanks for playing.

you are wrong. as cogman already admitted, the us government has already stated it lied about several of the incidents mentioned also stated in post #85, i never said the us government admitted to lying about ALL of the incidents. again, you failed at reading comprehension for the 4th time. try again for number 5, son.
 

al981

Golden Member
May 28, 2009
1,036
0
0
AzN has shown he doesn't have a single logical thread in his body. What would the US have to gain by invading NK? Nothing -- the country is a worthless shithole with absolutely nothing to offer the world. If NK had resources which were important to the world economy or something like that, the US would've dispatched them long, long ago. As it stands, they have nothing but a bunch of mud huts, a crazy dictator, a brainwashed army, and disgusting, hypocritical sycophants like AzN who toes the party line and refuses to answer direct questions to him because he knows he is trolling. No one is that dense.

worthless shithole? u mean vietnam, right?
 

manowar821

Diamond Member
Mar 1, 2007
6,063
0
0
Let's make a deal.

You go back to Korea and then we'll talk about removing our troops.

Personally, I don't think US troops should be anywhere except in the US. We're not at war with anyone.

There's only one problem, though. WWIII will have to happen, and we'd have to lose it, hard.
 

IndyColtsFan

Lifer
Sep 22, 2007
33,656
687
126
you are wrong. as cogman already admitted, the us government has already stated it lied about several of the incidents mentioned also stated in post #85, i never said the us government admitted to lying about ALL of the incidents. again, you failed at reading comprehension for the 4th time. try again for number 5, son.

Someone needs to go back to Reading 101. Is it that hard? I'm not claiming they lied or DIDN'T lie -- I am saying, POST THE LINKS and I'll read them and decide for myself. YOU claimed they lied. I did not say they lied, nor did I say they did NOT lie. POST THE LINKS!

This isn't hard. Of course the US has lied about things in the past -- EVERY government has. You aren't making a bold, earth-shattering claim here. No one has denied that; you need to learn to read and understand what I am saying. I'll make it really simple for you -- for the list you provided, please provide evidence that either 1) the government has admitted a lie or cover up or 2) Reputable, impartial organizations have overwhelming evidence of a cover up. By the way, www.abovetopsecret.com is NOT a reputable source.
 

al981

Golden Member
May 28, 2009
1,036
0
0
Someone needs to go back to Reading 101. Is it that hard? I'm not claiming they lied or DIDN'T lie -- I am saying, POST THE LINKS and I'll read them and decide for myself. YOU claimed they lied. I did not say they lied, nor did I say they did NOT lie. POST THE LINKS!

This isn't hard. Of course the US has lied about things in the past -- EVERY government has. You aren't making a bold, earth-shattering claim here. No one has denied that; you need to learn to read and understand what I am saying. I'll make it really simple for you -- for the list you provided, please provide evidence that either 1) the government has admitted a lie or cover up or 2) Reputable, impartial organizations have overwhelming evidence of a cover up. By the way, www.abovetopsecret.com is NOT a reputable source.

you and cogman must be related. i didn't give him a link and he eventually did his own research and admitted the us government lied its ass off about several events.

your homework assignment is the same as cogman's. the events are common knowledge. i'm not posting jack for you


This isn't hard. Of course the US has lied about things in the past

the us lied its ass off, really? well hey, that's my entire point. gg son.
 

IndyColtsFan

Lifer
Sep 22, 2007
33,656
687
126
you and cogman must be related. i didn't give him a link and he eventually did his own research and admitted the us government lied its ass off about several events.

your homework assignment is the same as cogman's. the events are common knowledge. i'm not posting jack for you

You won't post, because you have been exposed. Please quote me where I said "The US government has never lied." You won't quote me, because you can't, and you've just been owned. As I said in the post above (which you conveniently ignored), I never said they lied or didn't lie -- I said "POST THE LINKS." You made the assertion, and since you won't back it up, I must assume you can't. Thanks for playing. <flush> That went down nicely!
 

IndyColtsFan

Lifer
Sep 22, 2007
33,656
687
126
the us lied its ass off, really? well hey, that's my entire point. gg son.

You are a genius -- seriously, Forrest Gump has nothing on you. What government hasn't lied about things? I'll be waiting (in vain) for an answer to that.

I am interested in discussing your specific list (specifically, the assertions regarding 9/11 and flight 800). I'll be waiting for reputable links.
 

al981

Golden Member
May 28, 2009
1,036
0
0
You won't post, because you have been exposed. Please quote me where I said "The US government has never lied." You won't quote me, because you can't, and you've just been owned. As I said in the post above (which you conveniently ignored), I never said they lied or didn't lie -- I said "POST THE LINKS." You made the assertion, and since you won't back it up, I must assume you can't. Thanks for playing. <flush> That went down nicely!

that doesn't make any sense, and you haven't owned jack. why should i post links for events that are common knowledge? i'm not going to spoon feed you any links for obvious lies such as the coup of iran. quit mouthing off and go do your homework, kid!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |