Where did CNN make judgment?
Dude, everybody has this now. You are going to have to hang it on the mainstream media. All of them are lying I guess. Sliming the messenger is simply not going to work.
Seriously though, would you REALLY be surprised that Mr Trump was a sexual pervert? If so, that says a whole lot more about you than Trump.
I was talking about me reserving judgment regarding this issue....not CNN. I thought I was being quite clear...apparently not.Where did CNN make judgment?
Read his post (and this time, try to also comprehend). He didn't say CNN made a judgement, he said he would reserve judgement, since CNN's reputation for being truthful and accurate is ... shall we say.. less than stellar these days.
DSF, the prince of objectivity, has decided to chime in.CNN is a highly objective news source of impeccable credibility...just ask Candy Crowley and Donna Brazile.
Um right.... because the intelligence agencies involved are LOUDLY and VOCIFEROUSLY proclaiming that they never provided such a briefing....
LoL.
I was talking about me reserving judgment regarding this issue....not CNN. I thought I was being quite clear...apparently not.
I see none of myself in Trump. Didn't vote for him and knew he was full of shit when the birtherism stuff started. That was well before he announced.
Has Trump still not learned anything from his own playbook
Run with this story as hard as you can. If evidence comes out later demonstrating it's conclusively false, keep running with it. Bring it up constantly. Use it as a rebuttal to everything, regardless of how absurdly out of context. Hold hearings on it. Lots of hearings, over and over and over. Doesn't matter if they all reach exactly the same conclusion. It's not the answer that matters, it's the show.
That's how you win elections in this country. Truth? Truth is for losers.
They brief the president and president-elect, but do you know the content of those briefings? Are they going to disclose them to the public? Of course not. So basically we have no idea who was briefed about what at this point, nor does it actually matter.
hahaha, looks like the fake news machine is working overtime again
Conversely what is your proof he wasn't briefed on this?They brief the president and president-elect, but do you know the content of those briefings? Are they going to disclose them to the public? Of course not. So basically we have no idea who was briefed about what at this point, nor does it actually matter.
I love all the value judgments from this highly credible source. Add in Tom Arnord's "proof" and we've got a scandal of epic proportions! /sI'm going to be fair and balanced here despite my loathing of the Cheeto-in-Charge. The report does have a lot of "he said that she said that they said" stuff in it. However, there are reports of possible audio and video record...and of all people Tom Arnold (of Roseanne fame) claims to have access to an online vault with records of the sex stuff.
Politics is fun!
lol You so desperately want to believe. Go for it...don't let the pesky absence of verifiable facts get in the way.Conversely what is your proof he wasn't briefed on this?
I love all the value judgments from this highly credible source. Add in Tom Arnord's "proof" and we've got a scandal of epic proportions! /s
Because a man who likes to grab women in their pussies would NEVER involve himself in pissing contests..... RIIIIGGGGGHHHHTTTTT.....
Dude you are VEERING from REALITY. That is a mistake.
lol You so desperately want to believe. Go for it...don't let the pesky absence of verifiable facts get in the way.
I see an unsubstantiated claim by an ex-British MI6 spy as well as a couple intelligence leaks that need to be investigated. What do you see?Dude, everybody has this now. You are going to have to hang it on the mainstream media. All of them are lying I guess. Sliming the messenger is simply not going to work.
Seriously though, would you REALLY be surprised that Mr Trump was a sexual pervert? If so, that says a whole lot more about you than Trump.
There doesn't seem to be much doubt that he was briefed on it but the actual facts of the briefing have to be investigated further. How is this complicated?
Yeah, cnn is so truthy. They'd never make up a story to drum up a war.The guy who routinely cites right wing editorial pieces as evidence thinks CNN isn't a good enough source. Sounds like someone we should listen to!
There doesn't seem to be much doubt that he was briefed on it but the actual facts of the briefing have to be investigated further. How is this complicated?
Says the bald-faced liar. lolThe guy who routinely cites right wing editorial pieces as evidence thinks CNN isn't a good enough source. Sounds like someone we should listen to!
There doesn't seem to be much doubt that he was briefed on it but the actual facts of the briefing have to be investigated further. How is this complicated?