Russian Military shows wreckage of US missiles intercepted in Syria

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Ns1

No Lifer
Jun 17, 2001
55,414
1,574
126
I think we can all agree that the truth is probably somewhere between the US and Russian versions. Let's just call it 50 hits between 3 targets and move on.
 
Reactions: cytg111

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,812
49,499
136
Honestly who cares what was shot down anyway? The only news here is that someone was dumb enough to believe the Russian government.
 
Reactions: Bitek

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
69,525
27,828
136
Honestly who cares what was shot down anyway? The only news here is that someone was dumb enough to believe the Russian government.
FIVR is the Russian government. I doubt he believes in anything but his paycheck.
 

Capt Caveman

Lifer
Jan 30, 2005
34,547
651
126
Thought Mr. Fake news was going to ban himself for his fake coup in Saudi Arabia? Yeah, I believe the Russians or any fake twitter account the retarded OP posts.

Even funnier is in the original thread of the missile strikes Mr. Fake News posted higher intercept rates. Which is it Mr. Fake News?
 
Reactions: rommelrommel

pauldun170

Diamond Member
Sep 26, 2011
9,139
5,074
136
Its an improvement over showing footage from Call of Duty but using random scrap to build a bullshit narrative is still painfully obvious.

This thread should probably go into the off topic forum.
A couple of Mayne posts could really up the quality of this thread.
 

mikeymikec

Lifer
May 19, 2011
18,042
10,224
136
Look at the goddamn pictures, dude.

My god! It's full of pictures of metal! Clearly these bits of metal are American in origin, you just have to look at them to know that. <sniffs the pictures>, hmm yes, from the southern slopes of California, I'd stake my reputation on it.
 
Reactions: OutHouse

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,266
126
I wonder what drives the OP to do these things to himself? This is a case where I have no empathy, indeed no visceral understanding, of why one would so clearly stake one's social standing in The Tribe, which is P&N.

One might reasonably say to the effect of "hey there's this report of a coup" without declaring 99% you pick me!

It does not seem like a good thing to do repeatedly.
 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
23,548
13,115
136
I think we can all agree that the truth is probably somewhere between the US and Russian versions. Let's just call it 50 hits between 3 targets and move on.

I vote yay.

Yea, no way in hell would I take either sides word for this... The first casualty in war is the truth.
Though .. I have no problem imagining the McOrange coordinating with Putin where to aim the missiles so they could be shot down easily. For show for show.
 
Reactions: Puffnstuff

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
26,689
25,000
136
Thought Mr. Fake news was going to ban himself for his fake coup in Saudi Arabia? Yeah, I believe the Russians or any fake twitter account the retarded OP posts.

Even funnier is in the original thread of the missile strikes Mr. Fake News posted higher intercept rates. Which is it Mr. Fake News?

The hand-off in the troll factory was poorly handled. The 2nd shift lost track of the 1st shift's talking points.
 

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
14,875
10,300
136
I've seen what cruise missiles look like after they crash, there is no "intact" about it. At least the visible holes are from the inside out, and that debris didn't really look like it is from a cruise missile, but even if it was, there would be plenty of debris laying around at the targets.
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,413
616
126
If you recall, the secretary of Defense Mattis claimed that every single missile hit its intended target and none were intercepted. That was a lie, as you can see below from the articles (with many pictures showing the debris). Now it is time for all the western media coolaid-drinking posters on this forum to eat crow. Soon, they will also be eating crow about the attempted Saudi coup. Not yet tho! Soon!




https://southfront.org/russian-mili...yria-says-two-unexploded-delivered-to-moscow/

The train wreck continues. How do you know the rissians aren't lying by showing chunks of metal from the bomb blowing up of its own device? But the russians say they shot it down so you belive them. Lololololol
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,266
126
I've seen what cruise missiles look like after they crash, there is no "intact" about it. At least the visible holes are from the inside out, and that debris didn't really look like it is from a cruise missile, but even if it was, there would be plenty of debris laying around at the targets.

Give a guy who knows Photoshop an hour and some old Jolt cola and that "evidence" might look like Scarlet Johansson. Ok, 2 Jolt Colas.
 

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
14,681
7,180
136
My god! It's full of pictures of metal! Clearly these bits of metal are American in origin, you just have to look at them to know that. <sniffs the pictures>, hmm yes, from the southern slopes of California, I'd stake my reputation on it.

Look closer and the "Made in China" stickers and engravings will pop right out at you. The drone parts are then sent to and assembled in the USA by H2B techs from India and Pakistan and then get sent back to the Middle East via submarine, surface battle craft and bombers. The only Americans involved in this whole deal are the management types, investors and the end users themselves. And those bits and pieces are just the ones that exploded from the previous "show of force" that we spanked Assad with.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
56,001
14,528
146
So far we have:

- Video of the attempted interceptions.
- Pictures of the debris, with noted shrapnel damage to outside of missile casing
- Word from Syrian Air defense that many were shot down
- Word from Russians that many were shot down
- Reports that 2 missiles were recovered intact and sent to Moscow

And the evidence provided by Mattis and the pentagon is basically "Muh Tomahawks are invincible, trust us!"

yet most of the posters on this forum would rather discount all evidence and trust a Trump supporter. FFS people think for a minute!

Consider the sources here. State run Russian media and a tyrant in Syria.

Your reply to me considers none of that. The reason the world's media outside of Russia and Syria are not carrying this is because it's not reputable and cannot be confirmed.

But yeah, believe a state owned propaganda media over the rest of the world, because derp state, illuminutty something something...
 
Last edited:

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
30,974
8,693
136
Thats pretty desperate by the Russians.

The Americans hit and destroyed all the targets they said they would.
The Russians failed to retaliate like they said they would.
They are crowing about destroying stuff that the Americas sent to blow up anyway?
 

FIVR

Diamond Member
Jun 1, 2016
3,753
911
106
Thats pretty desperate by the Russians.

The Americans hit and destroyed all the targets they said they would.
The Russians failed to retaliate like they said they would.
They are crowing about destroying stuff that the Americas sent to blow up anyway?


Agreed. The Russians did not even shoot these missiles down. They stood by and let the Syrians take the hits and let them defend themselves. A pitiful performance by the Russians all around.


The only thing more pitiful and pathetic than the Russians is the US and its semi-retarded cruise missiles half of which weren't even shot down, they simply crashed. Probably because they were built by Trump supporters in factories all over America. What an embarrassment for our country, and one that was only exacerbated by Mattis blatantly lying on national television. Only an idiot would actually believe that "100% of 103 missiles hit their targets and Syrian air defenses fired in salute at a later time, blinded by muh tomahawk glory".
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |