Ryzen-A Fail for Gamers?

Page 25 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
23,991
13,518
136
I think a lot of folks have this thing kind of backwards. Ryzen isn't the best gaming CPU (that title goes to the 7700k). Ryzen isn't the best workstation CPU either, though it comes very close. That remains the 6900k and 6950k.

What Ryzen is, is a way to split the difference. A way to get workstation performance from a relatively inexpensive CPU, one that can still game effectively. And gaming performance is likely to improve in the near-to-mid term, with some updates to Windows scheduling (specifically to avoid unnecessary cross-CCX communication), along with the slow trend of increased multi-threading anyway.

Intel's products are the specialist CPUs. Ryzen is more of a general-use CPU. It's a very good general purpose chip, too.

Looking down I have my scorecard something like this

First round, efficiency: Undisputed King
As The Stilt put it here
- http://www.portvapes.co.uk/?id=Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps&exid=threads/ryzen-strictly-technical.2500572/
"850 points in Cinebench 15 at 30W is quite telling. Or not telling, but absolutely massive. Zeppelin can reach absolutely monstrous and unseen levels of efficiency, as long as it operates within its ideal frequency range."

Second round, productivity : competetive at a much lower price point. A clear win.

Third round, gaming : Somewhat behind, a clear loss here. May change in time.

Fourth round, maturity : Betaish. A clear loss. Will change in time.
 

DuronBurgerMan

Junior Member
Mar 13, 2017
21
19
41
Looking down I have my scorecard something like this

First round, efficiency: Undisputed King

Second round, productivity : competetive at a much lower price point. A clear win.

Third round, gaming : Somewhat behind, a clear loss here. May change in time.

Fourth round, maturity : Betaish. A clear loss. Will change in time.

Scorecard appears correct on all points. Honestly, this has all the hallmarks of a release that AMD pushed a hair early. Probably because of internal politics or something. The good news is that the areas AMD lost in are also areas which are likely to see great improvement in the near future. If this CPU had sucked in workstation and synthetic benchmarks, and then was also behind in gaming and beta-ish in the maturity department... there'd be no interest in Ryzen. It'd be another Bulldozer disappointment. But they clearly did something right here with Ryzen. They just pushed the release too early, I think.
 

Puffnstuff

Lifer
Mar 9, 2005
16,147
4,847
136
Another seller on amazon who's probably tired of waiting for his mb is selling a new 1800x for $455 just in case anyone is looking for a bargain on it. Just remember that Amazon has an A-Z guarantee to protect buyers of 3rd party merchandize which I've used before.
 

TheELF

Diamond Member
Dec 22, 2012
4,026
753
126
No <redacted> Sherlock. 20% utilisation of 16 threads is 3.2 threads @100%; long live the Pentium according to your BS.

The point was that the game is barely even using one fully, yet still wants to shuffle threads all over the place. It is this needless shuffling that is handicapping Ryzen. <redacted> needs to be optimised to make best use of Ryzen.

Profanity is not allowed in the technical forums
Markfw
Anandtech Moderator
How often do people have to tell this over and over?
Thread bouncing prevents tools from telling you the real utilization,look at the picture 1 thread at 23+ % out of 25% so any core that is going to run this thread will be pretty much completely maxed out yet afterburner shows max of 70%
Every game does use at least one core fully as long as your gpu doesn't give up before that happens.
 

krumme

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2009
5,956
1,595
136
System details won't tell me motherboard firmware version used, firmware settings and chipset drivers used.
ANY reviewer trying to do a compelling job WILL include that information always.
At this point in time, those little details are making all the difference for AM4 .
Or have you even stopped to think on why the ryzen reviews show results all over the place? Have you even analyzed the numbers and try to figure out why?
As quick example, not a single reviewer has posted version of chipset drivers used! If you truly have built an AM4 system you should already know that there a quite a few things that the chipset drivers are installing.

That is, however, if the video included system settings.
This last one you posted doesn't include them. All it does is show video settings. No system settings at all in the video, so I'll assume OEM A320 board, dd4-2133 cl18.
As i can tell from the spec in the batman video 4x4GB is used with spec c17 2800.
We dont know how fast the ram is going because its not stated. But as its 4 pcx modules its fair to asume its 2133 i would say. Probably c18 as you say as its slow ram out the gate.
A 4 ram module setup for zen in 2133 is pretty stupid if the purpose is gaming. It will slow the ccx data transfer aprox 40% vs a good setup.
So alone on that account pretty bad setup and another useless video of boring gameplay.

Its unavoidable in a thread like this. 2% good video where people have taken their time to simulate real gameplay and then spamming of the same useless videos.

Thats not to say zen doesnt need a lot of work for gaming. Obviously it does. But higher srandards for testing instead of quantity would be appriciated to evaluate whats real. The testing methology keeps us in the singleplayer- low cpu load situation- stoneage.
 
Last edited:

Triloby

Senior member
Mar 18, 2016
587
275
136
I'm just going to say this....

If all you do is game at 1080p and 60 FPS, then there's literally not much of a difference between Ryzen 7 and the 7700K. And while is there is a good chunk of people that play at 1440p and above (along with those who have 144 Hz monitors), I would wager that the average PC gamer out there is still playing at 1080p with a 60 Hz display (monitor or TV). If the 1% lows of your FPS in your games are still above 60 FPS, then choosing between either of those two CPU's is moot. Unless you mainly play twitch games where good input responsiveness above 60 FPS is desirable, but even then, you don't need an Core i7 or a Ryzen 7 to play those kinds of games.

As of right now, the 7700K is the better gaming CPU. However, that doesn't make Ryzen an absolute failure for gamers. If anything, Bulldozer was a much bigger failure compared to Ryzen.
 

psolord

Platinum Member
Sep 16, 2009
2,089
1,234
136

Good video, thanks.

Still I do not understand what is everybody complaining about? All I see is great potential and a huge performance jump for AMD. Seriously guys let's chill a bit, ok?

I mean did you see the performance in Watchdogs 1? Having benchmarked this quite lengthily, I can assure you it's a streaming nightmare. I am pretty sure my 2500k is having nightmares at night from its benchmark on this game.

Batman and Project cars also run quite better compared to my 2500k@4.8Ghz, which let me assure you it's not a slouch.
 
Last edited:

IEC

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Jun 10, 2004
14,440
5,429
136
Look at that PCPer URL... "sheckels" (sp) really?
 

krumme

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2009
5,956
1,595
136
More 2133 ram bm spamming. It might even run 1866.
Therefore useless game benchmarks.
Borders on trolling imo that you keep spamming those youtube bm here knowing pretty well the bm is not representative due to the low ram setting. All that anger. So then its okey to mislead people?
 

Head1985

Golden Member
Jul 8, 2014
1,867
699
136
More 2133 ram bm spamming. It might even run 1866.
Therefore useless game benchmarks.
Borders on trolling imo that you keep spamming those youtube bm here knowing pretty well the bm is not representative due to the low ram setting. All that anger. So then its okey to mislead people?
maybe i should report you for trolling
bellow video:

PC Build Ryzen 7 1700: https://goo.gl/jXs7HH

CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 1700 - http://amzn.to/2mkfQ9j
COOLER: AMD Wraith Spire LED Cooler
MB: MSI B350 TOMAHAWK - http://amzn.to/2mHcUGK
RAM: ADATA 16GB KIT (4x4GB) DDR4 2800MHz CL17 PC4-22400 XPG Z1 - http://amzn.to/2bMhSgV
PSU: be quiet! Pure Power L7-530W 80 plus
SSD: SAMSUNG 120GB 2,5 SSD 840 EVO - http://amzn.to/2bvoKNr
HDD#1: SEAGATE Barracuda ST3000DM001 3TB - http://amzn.to/2c3T40n
CASE: Lian Li PC-T60B ATX/Micro ATX Test Bench (Black) - http://amzn.to/2c97UWg

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PC Build i5 3570k:

CPU: Intel Core i5 3570k - http://amzn.to/2bZUIlD
COOLER: NOCTUA NH-U9B SE2 - http://amzn.to/2bZTgjn
MB: MSI Z77A-G45
PSU: EVGA 500B http://amzn.to/2co94ul
RAM: Corsair XMS3 3x4GB OC 2000Mhz - http://amzn.to/2cmA9B8
HDD: SEAGATE Barracuda 1TB - http://amzn.to/2bLvYNK

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PC Build Skylake i7 6700k: https://goo.gl/oD1a9r

CPU: Intel Core i7 6700k Skylake - http://amzn.to/2bvpe6d
COOLER: Cooler Master Hyper 103 - http://amzn.to/2c3Ta8t
MB: MSI Z170A GAMING M7 - http://amzn.to/2bwCOYO
RAM: ADATA 16GB KIT (4x4GB) DDR4 2800MHz CL17 PC4-22400 XPG Z1 - http://amzn.to/2bMhSgV
PSU: be quiet! Pure Power L7-530W 80 plus
SSD: SAMSUNG 120GB 2,5 SSD 840 EVO - http://amzn.to/2bvoKNr
HDD#1: SEAGATE Barracuda ST3000DM001 3TB - http://amzn.to/2c3T40n
CASE: Lian Li PC-T60B ATX/Micro ATX Test Bench (Black) - http://amzn.to/2c97UWg
 

unseenmorbidity

Golden Member
Nov 27, 2016
1,395
967
96

I heard this guy was testing with 4 sticks of DDR4, which is an utter fail. His memory is almost certainly running at 2133.

maybe i should report you for trolling
bellow video:

PC Build Ryzen 7 1700: https://goo.gl/jXs7HH

CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 1700 - http://amzn.to/2mkfQ9j
COOLER: AMD Wraith Spire LED Cooler
MB: MSI B350 TOMAHAWK - http://amzn.to/2mHcUGK
RAM: ADATA 16GB KIT (4x4GB) DDR4 2800MHz CL17 PC4-22400 XPG Z1 - http://amzn.to/2bMhSgV
PSU: be quiet! Pure Power L7-530W 80 plus
SSD: SAMSUNG 120GB 2,5 SSD 840 EVO - http://amzn.to/2bvoKNr
HDD#1: SEAGATE Barracuda ST3000DM001 3TB - http://amzn.to/2c3T40n
CASE: Lian Li PC-T60B ATX/Micro ATX Test Bench (Black) - http://amzn.to/2c97UWg

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PC Build i5 3570k:

CPU: Intel Core i5 3570k - http://amzn.to/2bZUIlD
COOLER: NOCTUA NH-U9B SE2 - http://amzn.to/2bZTgjn
MB: MSI Z77A-G45
PSU: EVGA 500B http://amzn.to/2co94ul
RAM: Corsair XMS3 3x4GB OC 2000Mhz - http://amzn.to/2cmA9B8
HDD: SEAGATE Barracuda 1TB - http://amzn.to/2bLvYNK

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PC Build Skylake i7 6700k: https://goo.gl/oD1a9r

CPU: Intel Core i7 6700k Skylake - http://amzn.to/2bvpe6d
COOLER: Cooler Master Hyper 103 - http://amzn.to/2c3Ta8t
MB: MSI Z170A GAMING M7 - http://amzn.to/2bwCOYO
RAM: ADATA 16GB KIT (4x4GB) DDR4 2800MHz CL17 PC4-22400 XPG Z1 - http://amzn.to/2bMhSgV
PSU: be quiet! Pure Power L7-530W 80 plus
SSD: SAMSUNG 120GB 2,5 SSD 840 EVO - http://amzn.to/2bvoKNr
HDD#1: SEAGATE Barracuda ST3000DM001 3TB - http://amzn.to/2c3T40n
CASE: Lian Li PC-T60B ATX/Micro ATX Test Bench (Black) - http://amzn.to/2c97UWg

Report people for trolling, lol.

Ohh so it was true.. Thanks for confirming his benchmarks are totally worthless.
 
Reactions: lightmanek

french toast

Senior member
Feb 22, 2017
988
825
136
Once again putting up random unsubstantiated videos showing ryzen is struggling in gaming, i take it this is your sole agenda here then?, why dont you balance it out and show titles that ryzen does well in? Or perhaps try and objectively disect what issues are holding ryzen up, whether that be hardware or software? I think we already know the answer dont we?.
What is the test setup? What speed ram? Only thing i can take is that most games prefer 4 fast threads, as spreading load doesnt seem to increase performance much, just lowers utilisation and presumably power consumption.
Once we see true dx12 engines and faster ram support things should look more favorable for ryzen, as it is intel obviously has a lead here, i expect you to continue to keep posting random ryzen fail videos like this and really not try to contibute anything new to the discussion, i might be wrong though.
 
Aug 11, 2008
10,451
642
126
Once again putting up random unsubstantiated videos showing ryzen is struggling in gaming, i take it this is your sole agenda here then?, why dont you balance it out and show titles that ryzen does well in? Or perhaps try and objectively disect what issues are holding ryzen up, whether that be hardware or software? I think we already know the answer dont we?.
What is the test setup? What speed ram? Only thing i can take is that most games prefer 4 fast threads, as spreading load doesnt seem to increase performance much, just lowers utilisation and presumably power consumption.
Once we see true dx12 engines and faster ram support things should look more favorable for ryzen, as it is intel obviously has a lead here, i expect you to continue to keep posting random ryzen fail videos like this and really not try to contibute anything new to the discussion, i might be wrong though.
You mean like a certain AMD fan posts nothing but BF1 "benchmarks" (actually his own unsubstantiated observations) over and over and over again?
 
Reactions: beginner99
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |