Some of you need to step back a little first??
Ryzen isn't an Athlon 64 moment where Intel was beaten in every game and almost every non-gaming benchmark.
The AMD and Intel CPUs are different designs,so will have different strengths and weaknesses.
There are games which Ryzen does worse in price/performance,than Intel,and games AMD will do better than in Intel in price/performance.
Trying to twist it either way is stupid,since for every person playing Battlefield 1 which loves cores,there is another person playing World of Tanks,etc which barely uses more than a few cores.
If someone plays Battlefield 1 they will love Ryzen 7,and if you play World of Tanks you will love the Core i3 7350K.
Ryzen isn't an Athlon 64 moment where Intel was beaten in every game and almost every non-gaming benchmark.
The AMD and Intel CPUs are different designs,so will have different strengths and weaknesses.
There are games which Ryzen does worse in price/performance,than Intel,and games AMD will do better than in Intel in price/performance.
Trying to twist it either way is stupid,since for every person playing Battlefield 1 which loves cores,there is another person playing World of Tanks,etc which barely uses more than a few cores.
If someone plays Battlefield 1 they will love Ryzen 7,and if you play World of Tanks you will love the Core i3 7350K.