Saddam, did you hear that? You have 48 hours to get out....

[Angrymarshmello]

Saddam is going to be someone's b1tch soon

 

[aphex]

Originally posted by: KennyH
What do you guys think?

I think that you need to learn the difference between 'here' and 'hear'.

 

[BooGiMaN]

You know it must really suck to be Saddam and his minions right now....i still think he should go to france and ask for asylum though..if for nothing more than the irony of it all if they refuse to take him in

 

[mrman3k]

Well hopefully in 72 hours he will be dead and Iraq liberated.

However, that is just wishful thinking:disgust:

 

[CPA]

Originally posted by: XZeroII
and then we give him another 2 weeks. Just like always, we keep giving him deadlines, then don't do anything when he ignores them

That would be true if Bush wasn't a man with convictions and true to his word. Do you think he is not?

 

[BarneyFife]

I'm not real sure about Saddam being toast. We sure have a hard time capturing the big fish. I'll bet that he'll leave to Syria or another neighboring country.

 

Originally posted by: Crazyfool

Originally posted by: KennyH
What do you guys think?

I think Saddam is about to meet Allah.

rofl, bewm!

 

[AUMM]

is it a bad time to be flying anywhere? i was just watching on the news that some airlines are allowing people to refund their tickets or reschedule because of the comming war. you guys think theres anything to be worried about??

 

[Conky]

Originally posted by: Renob
I think Saddam is about to meet Allah.


Not me, he is going str8 to HELL.

He will meet him and Allah will tell Saddam "No soup for you, infidel!"

And then Saddam will go to hell and start a gay relationship with the Devil as per South Park.

 

[BarneyFife]

Originally posted by: AUMM
is it a bad time to be flying anywhere? i was just watching on the news that some airlines are allowing people to refund their tickets or reschedule because of the comming war. you guys think theres anything to be worried about??

Yes there might be something to worry about. I certainly wouldn't fly anywhere unless I had to. Americans are targets and would recommend against going to a foreign country for the time being as when the first bombs hit, protests will go up ten fold.

 

[pcman2002b]

Sounds like another "last" chance. How many have we given him now.

Disarm or we'll...
Get out or we'll...
Disarm or we'll...
I'm gonna count to three...
And then I'm gonna count to three AGAIN!

Would somebody just assassinate the freak already. For God's sake! Do something, I'm sure he's just shaking in is turbin (SP!).

 

[Tripleshot]

If Saddam leaves, his army will give him up. I believe Saddam is willing to be martyred, his ego is that big. After his death, I would bet Iraqi people will obliterate all signs of Saddams existance after we liberate them from his tyranny. Yes, we are in this to kill Saddam and his sons. We are launching a war to cover the murder of this maniac who has a long laundry list of genocide on his own people. I do find it very hard to believe we will take all measures to reduce civilian casualties. In order to reach our objective, we must rapidly see victory, so that those who surround Saddam will be more ready to give him up, rather than die with him. Because of that, some very heavy bombing and major assaults will take place early on. You can not avoid civilain casualties under those circumstances.

When the opening salvo is over, and the dust clears, the world public is going to see the ugliness of war.









I love the smell of napalm in the morning.

 

[Ausm]

Originally posted by: Evadman

Originally posted by: wfbberzerker now, does the 48 hours start after the speech? or right when bush said it?

like it matters. he is toast anyway.

Time To light him up

AUsm

 

[Dacalo]

Saddam better be killed because if he is left alive, there will be too many complications

 

[NikPreviousAcct]

It's about goddamn time.

 

[Finality]

Originally posted by: Ben50

Originally posted by: Finality
Anyone else see the flaw in Bushs thinking?

Anyone really think Saddam will leave?

And since he wont leave what does he have to lose? He knows we're going to get him sooner or later dead or alive so whats going to stop him from doing whatever he wants? Anthrax/nukes/chemical warfare you name it. Like I said he has nothing to lose so whats the difference?

Well the obvious idea is that we are going to stop him using force if necessary. It seems that you are implying Sadam will somehow lose his capability to use whatever weapons he does have if only we wait longer. I would like to hear your reasoning behind that if it is truly what you are trying state.

I'm not saying he would lose his capability....

I'm just stating why defualt to a defacto state of war? Does Saddam suck? Yes. Will going to war with him RIGHT NOW accomplish anything? No... All I see are a lot of dead soldiers and civilians. I just dont see why he couldn't wait any longer for the UN inspectors to do as much as they could to destroy some of those weapons. They where succeeding not at a fast rate but they where succeeding...

By Bushs logic soldiers are going to die anyway so might as well get it over it? What was the sudden rush with the 3 month timetable? He was in office 2 years and he suddenly decides its time to go after Saddam....

Your basically backing a rabbid dog into a corner all thats left for it to do is attack you with all its got.

 

[Daxxax]

Originally posted by: XZeroII
and then we give him another 2 weeks. Just like always, we keep giving him deadlines, then don't do anything when he ignores them

No, this is the the Endgame. Good bye Saddam!!! You POS!!!

 

[xirtam]

Well he's got 3 options now: 1) Fight, 2) Run, 3) Hide

Let's see if he figures out a way to kick it with Osama.

 

[Daxxax]

Originally posted by: Finality

Originally posted by: Ben50

Originally posted by: Finality
Anyone else see the flaw in Bushs thinking?

Anyone really think Saddam will leave?

And since he wont leave what does he have to lose? He knows we're going to get him sooner or later dead or alive so whats going to stop him from doing whatever he wants? Anthrax/nukes/chemical warfare you name it. Like I said he has nothing to lose so whats the difference?

Well the obvious idea is that we are going to stop him using force if necessary. It seems that you are implying Sadam will somehow lose his capability to use whatever weapons he does have if only we wait longer. I would like to hear your reasoning behind that if it is truly what you are trying state.

I'm not saying he would lose his capability....

I'm just stating why defualt to a defacto state of war? Does Saddam suck? Yes. Will going to war with him RIGHT NOW accomplish anything? No... All I see are a lot of dead soldiers and civilians. I just dont see why he couldn't wait any longer for the UN inspectors to do as much as they could to destroy some of those weapons. They where succeeding not at a fast rate but they where succeeding...

By Bushs logic soldiers are going to die anyway so might as well get it over it? What was the sudden rush with the 3 month timetable? He was in office 2 years and he suddenly decides its time to go after Saddam....

Your basically backing a rabbid dog into a corner all thats left for it to do is attack you with all its got.

No, not really, I figure 70 to 80 percent of the Iraq regular army will surrender when given the chance. The only thing Saddam has is whatever Chemical, biological weapons he may have, his "Elite" Republican Guard and a few of his closes advisers. The meat of the war will be over in a weeks time, the hard part will be going into Baghdad and smoking the rat out of his hole.

 

[amcdonald]

Finality... his logic is this... Saddam is hording weapons. We can only assume this is in preparation for something because of his determination to hold onto them. Also there is a threat of him giving weapons to terrorists intending them to be used against US & allies.
If we attack now we can catch him off guard. If we wait until HE, or the terrorist networks he supports, are ready to strike, we would definitely be subject to homeland terrorism. This preemptive strike is desgined to disable saddam before he can really do anything to US soil.

 

[Led Zeppelin]

What's stopping Saddam from attacking us first? He knows now he as 48 hours, so what does he have to lose? I have a feeling this will turn out just like the way we have yet to get our paws on bin Laden.

 

[SuperTool]

Originally posted by: amcdonald
Finality... his logic is this... Saddam is hording weapons. We can only assume this is in preparation for something because of his determination to hold onto them. Also there is a threat of him giving weapons to terrorists intending them to be used against US & allies.
If we attack now we can catch him off guard. If we wait until HE, or the terrorist networks he supports, are ready to strike, we would definitely be subject to homeland terrorism. This preemptive strike is desgined to disable saddam before he can really do anything to US soil.

LOL. Off guard? It's a year too late for that.

 

[66FMC]

How have to wonder what the hell Saddam is thinking. Does he have a plan? Did he think Bush was bluffing all this time? Does he think he can win this war? Is he just accepting death?

 

[Led Zeppelin]

I bet he's absolutely nowhere near Baghdad, and probably hasn't been for a long time. I'll be really shocked if they get to him, even more so if they kill him.

 

[KennyH]

I think that you need to learn the difference between 'here' and 'hear'.

Sorry about that aphex, I was posting fast!