OH, I read why it was overturned--didn't realize that this could go further if they get taken under oath (yeah right!), so that's one thing.
Still, as it stands, all this ruling now shows is that these players were not punished for doing what they did, which absolutely sends the wrong message for the league. I don't give a rats ass that this is done everywhere, most likely--but someone has to take the fall, right? that's the important thing.
(I would be equally incensed if my Redskins had been caught doing this, and demand the same "justice." ...of course, one can imagine some possible fallout from such a scenario--Snyder jumping ship! Ohhh, one can only hope. :\)
You are already taking for granted that the players are guilty of everything that they were accused of. The problem with that is that the credibility of all of the evidence that Goodell allegedly used to levy his very harsh punishment has been called into question. And since he won't actually make it publicly available, despite being sued for defamation by Vilma, that doesn't help his case very much.
NFL players do not have a long shelf life, generally speaking. You shouldn't suspend someone and threaten their livelihood unless you're ready to back up the punishment with full disclosure.
Personally, I think he used these players and the Saints' coaches as scapegoats to show that he was 'getting tough' and serious about player injuries. It just happened to coincide with former players filing lawsuits saying that the NFL didn't do enough to protect them from head injuries. What a coincidence.
I won't claim that they are all completely innocent, but I certainly think they've been made scapegoats.
Last edited: