Saints caught running "bounty" program that awarded injuring players

Page 8 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

BergeLSU

Senior member
Apr 6, 2011
475
0
76
Punishment is WAYYY over the top IMO.

The NFL is stupid


I agree. I expected the draft picks (I thought a 2nd rounder in 2012, and 1st rounder in 2013), but a year for Payton hurts. If it were for the season, that would be better, because he could still be around in the offseason. The way it is now, on April 1, he has to leave the team for a full year. That means he will have no contact for the draft, which will be tricky because the Saints' first pick is a 3rd rounder.

I understand this is a compliance issue more than anything for the NFL. They told Loomis to stop it, and he, Williams, and Payton didn't. The act itself is not damning like people like to say. People like to condemn the Saints for the Vikings game. How do commentators say how to control a great QB? As a Saints fan I hear it every game. "If you want to control Drew Brees you have to hit him hard and often."

Are people so dense that they think the players would not have hit Favre as hard had there not been a meager reward? That these guys did not want to win the game, they just wanted a small bonus?
 

rudeguy

Lifer
Dec 27, 2001
47,371
14
61
Punishment is WAYYY over the top IMO.

The NFL is stupid

they can't be seen as condoning this kind of thing. Think about the billion dollar lawsuits if they did...

If it had been a wink wink, nudge nudge thing, this wouldn't even be a headline. But the dumbasses put it in writing.
 

sactoking

Diamond Member
Sep 24, 2007
7,550
2,763
136
My guess is that the 1 year for Payton and other suspensions was so steep not because of the infraction but because Payton, Williams, et al repeatedly lied about it to the league office. I'd put money on the suspension being something like 6-8 games for running the bounties and 8-10 games for lying about it (if Goodell were forced to break it down and he was honest).
 

jlarsson

Golden Member
Jul 31, 2001
1,050
0
76
Punishment is WAYYY over the top IMO.

That was my initial reaction. However, reading through the NFL statements about the punishments, it's clear that Coach Payton new about the bounty program and lied to NFL investigators about his knowledge of it. The attempts to cover it up to the NFL was what did the GM and Coach Payton in, despite not being active in the program.

It's very important to realize that Roger Goodell is on a mission to help make the game safer for players (look at all the roughing QB rules passed within the past few years). Anything that would undermine that initiative is going to result in some heavy penalties/fines.
 

Phokus

Lifer
Nov 20, 1999
22,995
776
126
Can't... stop... laughing...

Shawne Merriman ‏ @shawnemerriman
Christ I wont even by use "Bounty" paper towels no more #Crazy
 

Phokus

Lifer
Nov 20, 1999
22,995
776
126
Can't... stop... laughing...

Shawne Merriman ‏ @shawnemerriman
Christ I wont even by use "Bounty" paper towels no more #Crazy
 

BergeLSU

Senior member
Apr 6, 2011
475
0
76
My guess is that the 1 year for Payton and other suspensions was so steep not because of the infraction but because Payton, Williams, et al repeatedly lied about it to the league office. I'd put money on the suspension being something like 6-8 games for running the bounties and 8-10 games for lying about it (if Goodell were forced to break it down and he was honest).

The media is taking the bounty thing and running with it.

Reports around the team for the past 2 seasons have been a little bad. Rumors were that the Saints front office thought it was untouchable with the success they had over the last 5 years. They took a franchise that was in shambles and was on the verge of being moved, and managed to put together a staff/team that won a Super Bowl. But clearly disobeying the NFL brought the hammer. Hell, they let Mike Ornstein associate with the team.


Look for "Bounty: Goddell. $10,000" signs at Saints games.
 

KeithTalent

Elite Member | Administrator | No Lifer
Administrator
Nov 30, 2005
50,235
117
116
Punishment seems reasonable. They needed to send a message. Message sent!

KT
 

Miramonti

Lifer
Aug 26, 2000
28,651
100
91
Can't... stop... laughing...

Shawne Merriman ‏ @shawnemerriman
Christ I wont even by use "Bounty" paper towels no more #Crazy
lol
That was my initial reaction. However, reading through the NFL statements about the punishments, it's clear that Coach Payton new about the bounty program and lied to NFL investigators about his knowledge of it. The attempts to cover it up to the NFL was what did the GM and Coach Payton in, despite not being active in the program.

It's very important to realize that Roger Goodell is on a mission to help make the game safer for players (look at all the roughing QB rules passed within the past few years). Anything that would undermine that initiative is going to result in some heavy penalties/fines.

I don't trust his motive as being so humanitarian. I believe he's simply being sensible, in this age of 'liability' and making an effort to protect the league from current and future lawsuits. That said, I don't disagree with the direction either.

At some point they are going to have to introduce a new style of football helmet that will reduce concussions. There are ones out there that absorb impact much better, yet the league has done nothing about it for some reason.
 

MetalMat

Diamond Member
Jun 14, 2004
9,692
36
91
The media is taking the bounty thing and running with it.

Reports around the team for the past 2 seasons have been a little bad. Rumors were that the Saints front office thought it was untouchable with the success they had over the last 5 years. They took a franchise that was in shambles and was on the verge of being moved, and managed to put together a staff/team that won a Super Bowl. But clearly disobeying the NFL brought the hammer. Hell, they let Mike Ornstein associate with the team.


Look for "Bounty: Goddell. $10,000" signs at Saints games.

New Orleans is offering a free flight for Goodell to come to the city for a "talk"
 

rudeguy

Lifer
Dec 27, 2001
47,371
14
61
lol


I don't trust his motive as being so humanitarian. I believe he's simply being sensible, in this age of 'liability' and making an effort to protect the league from current and future lawsuits. That said, I don't disagree with the direction either.

At some point they are going to have to introduce a new style of football helmet that will reduce concussions. There are ones out there that absorb impact much better, yet the league has done nothing about it for some reason.

they already use the soft shells. Those were supposed to be the game changer.

I agree with one of the old timers they had as a commentator last year. Take away their facemasks and the helmet situation will disappear.
 

AstroManLuca

Lifer
Jun 24, 2004
15,628
5
81
How do commentators say how to control a great QB? As a Saints fan I hear it every game. "If you want to control Drew Brees you have to hit him hard and often."

Are people so dense that they think the players would not have hit Favre as hard had there not been a meager reward? That these guys did not want to win the game, they just wanted a small bonus?

Well, regarding the first bit there, you can hit a QB legally, run into him JUST after he releases the ball so he falls over, and that will take its toll. Some of the high-low hits on Favre were blatantly against the rules and should have been called as roughing the passer penalties (the NFL officials even admitted it afterward).

But I do agree that a small bounty has to be a tiny motivating factor compared with the chance of going to (and possibly winning) a Super Bowl. The amount of money any player can potentially make from being on a Super Bowl winning team is huge compared to a few thousand bucks from a bounty.

I think the issue isn't that there were bounties, just that hits with the express intention of injuring other players were encouraged. It effect, it was extremely stupid of the Saints' staff to do this; without bounties, they would have plausible deniability and could claim that they were simply telling their players to play hard.
 

NeoV

Diamond Member
Apr 18, 2000
9,531
2
81
I think it's appropriate - it's not just the bounty program itself, it's the cover-up and lies on top of it

The topic of helmet safety is a much different issue
 

BergeLSU

Senior member
Apr 6, 2011
475
0
76
I think the issue isn't that there were bounties, just that hits with the express intention of injuring other players were encouraged. It effect, it was extremely stupid of the Saints' staff to do this; without bounties, they would have plausible deniability and could claim that they were simply telling their players to play hard.

I agree. I won't defend Williams or Payton. They broke the rules. They were told to stop. They didn't.

Damning stuff from the release. Here are a few bits:

3. Coach Williams acknowledged that he designed and implemented the program with the assistance of certain defensive players. He said that he did so after being told by Saints Head Coach Sean Payton that his assignment was to make the defense "nasty." Coach Williams described his role as overseeing record keeping, defining payout amounts, deciding on who received payouts, and distributing envelopes with cash to players who "earned" rewards.

10. When interviewed in 2012, Sean Payton claimed to be entirely unaware of the program, a claim contradicted by others. Further, prior to the Saints' opening game in 2011, Coach Payton received an email from a close associate that stated in part, "PS Greg Williams put me down for $5000 on Rogers (sic)." When shown the email during the course of the investigation, Coach Payton stated that it referred to a "bounty" on Green Bay quarterback Aaron Rodgers.

11. In early 2010, Mr. Loomis advised Coach Payton that the league office was investigating allegations concerning a bounty program. Coach Payton said that he met with his top two defensive assistants, Coach Williams and Coach Vitt, in advance of the interview with league investigators and told them, "Let's make sure our ducks are in a row." Remarkably, Coach Payton claimed that he never inquired of Coach Williams and Coach Vitt as to what happened in the interviews, never asked them if a "pay-for-performance" or bounty program was in fact in place, and never gave any instructions to discontinue such a program.

12. In January 2012, prior to the Saints' first playoff game of the 2011 season, Coach Payton was advised by Mr. Loomis that the league office had reopened the investigation. Coach Payton made a cursory inquiry but took no action to ensure that any bounty program was discontinued.

So the program was still in place in the playoffs in January, and they still couldn't stop Alex Smith? Good riddance.
 

Sheep

Golden Member
Jun 13, 2006
1,275
0
71
How do commentators say how to control a great QB? As a Saints fan I hear it every game. "If you want to control Drew Brees you have to hit him hard and often."

There's a world of difference between "Knock him on his ass!" and "There's $10,000 in it for you if you knock him on his ass!".
 

rudeguy

Lifer
Dec 27, 2001
47,371
14
61
There's a world of difference between "Knock him on his ass!" and "There's $10,000 in it for you if you knock him on his ass!".

no

there is a difference between knocking him on his ass and knocking him out of the game. That is what has everyone upset.
 

GCS

Diamond Member
Oct 16, 1999
4,898
0
71
I said it once and I will say it again. The world is nuts and the NFL if they think this isn't going on in some form on every team. Question is who is dumb enough to get caught.
 

Sheep

Golden Member
Jun 13, 2006
1,275
0
71
no

there is a difference between knocking him on his ass and knocking him out of the game. That is what has everyone upset.

Bottom line is that the NFL has rules against ANY bonus incentives for specific performances in a game like INTs or causing fumbles. I doubt the NFL would have come down as hard if it were coaches telling their players to "knock Favre out of the game" or something along that line without dangling a bonus amount in front of them.
 
Apr 17, 2003
37,622
0
76
they can't be seen as condoning this kind of thing. Think about the billion dollar lawsuits if they did...

If it had been a wink wink, nudge nudge thing, this wouldn't even be a headline. But the dumbasses put it in writing.

"Let sue the NFL over the bounty program!" They only suspended Peyton 8 games!"

"We can't sue the NFL over the bounty program...they suspended Peyton for the season."

See how the severity of punishment very little to do with the legal implications?
 

thraashman

Lifer
Apr 10, 2000
11,093
1,535
126
I think the punishment wasn't quite severe enough. The Saints should have lost a first round draft pick in there somewhere as well. Sean Payton being suspended for a year is adequate to me, not too much and not too little. Maybe with Payton gone the Saints will learn to have some class ... but I doubt it.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |