Reminds me of the old desktop GPU wars.
I personally have never based my buying decisions on benchmarks for mobile devices. I simply try them out in the real world and then decide.
These.LOL at people basing their buying decision on benchmarks alone
Well what are you gonna do. I'm not all that surprised considering Samsung pays people to bash their competitors.
Wait, I am confused.
The Snapdragon 600 models are very close to the Exynos version. Without this hack, wouldn't the Exynos version be clearly inferior? Is this just Samsung's way of covering for a bad homegrown SoC?
Does this performance optimization affect the Galaxy S4 "Google Play" Edition?
Wait, I am confused.
The Snapdragon 600 models are very close to the Exynos version. Without this hack, wouldn't the Exynos version be clearly inferior? Is this just Samsung's way of covering for a bad homegrown SoC?
They are calling Intel to find out what the appropriate level of outrage should be. Just saying. ^^
More like calling whether they have actual consumers products people would actually buy on market yet? lol.
Anyway, it's well known that the Octa is a defective chip and nobody in the developed world buys the Exynos version anyway.
ROFL...
So you're saying Korea is undeveloped? The very country that owns Samsung (the biggest electronics company in the world)?
Okay then...
This thread is full of misinformation and makes Anandtech look like a bunch of misinformed people... mods should certainly close this embarrassing thread.
Korea also gets the S600 so why would they buy the lousy version without 4G when the S600 is superior for all intents and purposes. Heck, they are complaining about being shortchanged by Samsung with the S600.
http://www.phonearena.com/news/Earl...f-a-Snapdragon-800-version-with-LTE-A_id44352
The only one embarrassing here is you. The children playground is *that* way, thank you very much. Remember to have an adult beside you for supervision.
LOl
Samsung pays me well
Samsung Taiwan said it had not been told about the investigation, however the subsidiary put a statement on its local Facebook page saying it had "ceased all marketing activities that involve the posting of anonymous comments".
It said all future marketing work would be more in line with its company philosophy of transparency and honesty.
Samsung makes some good products but they are a mega-shady conglomerate that basically has the South Korean govt in their back pocket.
So AT has a followup article on this and they still don't flat out flame Samsung for cheating on benchmarks.
I am more disappointed in AT than I am with Samsung at the moment.
So AT has a followup article on this and they still don't flat out flame Samsung for cheating on benchmarks.
I am more disappointed in AT than I am with Samsung at the moment.
Or maybe as professionals, they're just presenting facts and letting the facts speak for itself. We're not children, we can come to the appropriate conclusion.
So this doesn't happen with the Qualcomm models? If not, what was the point?
Still confused.