Then buy a dedicated MP3 player? If music was that important to me, that's what I'd do...
I don't see the need for that much local storage on a phone. I understand wanting it, but I don't think the majority of smartphone users out there would take full advantage of it, so the handset builders must not think it's worth doing if it means all phones get bulkier and/or more expensive.
Great, but it's not micro. Micro is only up to 64gb, which is why I noted that 80gb is the current tech limit.Lexar 128GB SDXC card: $200.
Well I hope that's true zin. That would make me a very happy camper.
KT
That's some seriously lofty requirements/dreams. Unless you accept some compromises I think you'll be waiting years before that's even close to a reality. Guess I can understand that you don't want to juggle music on and off the device, but almost think you'd be better off with a 160GB ipod for planerides etc.
Personally I think I can accept 32GB in the device and streaming/caching of all my music from Subsonic or Google music. It's not that much hassle so I can live with it, until we get 250GB flash storage on phones
edit: and if you're that serious about music it's my understanding that the DAC on most phones is not that great, and there are dedicated mp3 players that give better sound quality (which I would think would be important to you)
Then buy a dedicated MP3 player? If music was that important to me, that's what I'd do...
.
Great, but it's not micro. Micro is only up to 64gb, which is why I noted that 80gb is the current tech limit.
aah! Didn't know that was different. I don't deal with SD cards SLR with CF and iPod only..
Well then the couple people here with massive collections have even longer to wait then.
man, your SLR must be as old as mine. i don't think they make them with CF any more, do they?
Max CF that I have is 1GB! ballin'!
pro models still use CF
I have a massive collection, but ripping it is a long, long process.Well then the couple people here with massive collections have even longer to wait then.
cool. I never had the desire to plunk down 10k..or even 6k on an SLR< so I wouldn't know.
man, your SLR must be as old as mine. i don't think they make them with CF any more, do they?
Max CF that I have is 1GB! ballin'!
old-ish; canon 40D. Released 2007 apparently. Man, older than I thought. But hey, I still think 10MP is enough. Think they went over to SD with the 60D? Not sure about the 7D. edit: yes CF. Like Anubis said I think all the pro models still stick with CF. Probably since the pros would freak if they had to replace 100s of gigs of cards
its because i have nearly 200GB of music and i want it ALL on my device. I know some people find this strange but its how i like to do things
i want it all on there so I
1) don't have to change stuff in and out
2) don't have to stream it from something which kills the battery and is not available without a connection (airplane)
3) carry around a separate device
i would actually do #3 but no one makes a mp3 player with enough space
This isn't true. 24FPS, with motion blur (like in a movie) is the minimum to fool the eye into thinking there's motion instead of just still images in a sequence but it's not identical to 60FPS especially with non-blurred motion like scrolling a webpage.Been using Opera Mobile since I bought the T-bolt, but the stock browser seemed equally smooth to me, once the page loaded fully. Opera loaded it faster though.
Since the human eye can't distinguish 24 to 60 though, does it matter?
The limiting factor with web browsing on a modern smartphone, of any OS, is data throughput.
Furthermore, it's been shown (on tests on fighter pilots IIRC) that the upper range of the human eye is more like 200FPS. Nonetheless, empirically, 60FPS is smooth for most people (although a steady FPS is more important).
In any case, perhaps the T-bolt's stock browser is accelerated as well. I've a modified stock browser that also runs at 60FPS for instance.
You should run the three "flinger" tests (Ocean, Text, Image) under Vellamo (free on the App Market) to see what your browser goes at for larger websites. I find that even pure stock runs fine for small mobile pages but if you try to load something like XDA Forums, it'll bog down amazingly.
Not a world phone apparently, which is disappointing but not terribly breaking for me at least.
is the point of this so you can switch with it to another carrier / it's unlocked / you can sell it when you're done?
Well that, but why would you want to with Verizons LTE. More like it wont have a GSM chip so unable to take it to most places over seas.
I don't know anyone that regularly does that
hilariousGoogle Translate said:S and S2 Galaxy Galaxy raised the bottom of the battery cover to pop out and I called your ass?