does all ICS require 1280x720?
Are you using lossless encoding or are you storing all the music in Vorbis/MP3/etc?
I think the OMAP CPUs are actually the fastest, clock for clock, vs Exynos and Snapdragons. Samsung and Qualcomm seem to actually design and implement better CPUs though, whereas TI just rehashes the older PowerVR GPUs. A year ago, the SGX540 was still among the most powerful, but its now being asked to do a LOT more than it was then.
That's MotoBlur dragging down the Bionic, saw the same thing on a co-worker's Bionic, behavior the T-bolt/CM7/ADWEx doesn't display.
Edit - The SGS1's also were extremely laggy, with the 1Ghz Hummingbird/SGX540, mostly due to the the RFS file system. But also due to Samsung's TouchWiz implementation and issues between it and 2.1, 2.2, 2.2.1, and 2.2.2.
Yes. Pretty much all of them, definitely all the currently shipping ones.
My T-bolt just did it perfectly smooth, once the page loaded all the way. Only 1 bar of 3G here.
Well, it'll do it at about 45fps actually.
But if you use Opera it'll be at 60FPS.
Yes. Pretty much all of them, definitely all the currently shipping ones.
My T-bolt just did it perfectly smooth, once the page loaded all the way. Only 1 bar of 3G here.
A
That's MotoBlur dragging down the Bionic, saw the same thing on a co-worker's Bionic, behavior the T-bolt/CM7/ADWEx doesn't display.
.
ok I guess something about the OG Droid just really sucks then and I thought it was all android hardwares or something
its not that it sucks it that its 2 years old and needed more ram
This, I've really had to cut down on what I do because I've effectively run out. I hate closing out a program and waiting on the launcher to repopulate because it was forced out of memory. Sigh...come on Galaxy Nexus, I want to love my phone again!
yea IDK why they went with so little on it, hell the DX is basically the same phone running at 1ghz with dbl the ram & a bigger screen and it runs fine
This, I've really had to cut down on what I do because I've effectively run out. I hate closing out a program and waiting on the launcher to repopulate because it was forced out of memory. Sigh...come on Galaxy Nexus, I want to love my phone again!
its not that it sucks it that its 2 years old and needed more ram
While I agree that it stinks that there may be no SD slot, I'm still (always have been & will be) confused as to why people want so much storage on their phone.
While I agree that it stinks that there may be no SD slot, I'm still (always have been & will be) confused as to why people want so much storage on their phone. 32GB built in won't be enough? I seriously use less than 5GB. If I were to add my entire music collection, I doubt I would even fill up a 16GB card. If I did that and actually used my camera a lot, maybe throw on 4 more gigs. Still would have plenty of room left on that 32GB storage.
its because i have nearly 200GB of music and i want it ALL on my device. I know some people find this strange but its how i like to do things
i want it all on there so I
1) don't have to change stuff in and out
2) don't have to stream it from something which kills the battery and is not available without a connection (airplane)
3) carry around a separate device
i would actually do #3 but no one makes a mp3 player with enough space
I thought I read somewhere that Google Music was going to allow for local caching for reasons you mentioned.
This isn't true. 24FPS, with motion blur (like in a movie) is the minimum to fool the eye into thinking there's motion instead of just still images in a sequence but it's not identical to 60FPS especially with non-blurred motion like scrolling a webpage.Been using Opera Mobile since I bought the T-bolt, but the stock browser seemed equally smooth to me, once the page loaded fully. Opera loaded it faster though.
Since the human eye can't distinguish 24 to 60 though, does it matter?
The limiting factor with web browsing on a modern smartphone, of any OS, is data throughput.
it does, however i cant cache everything
You should run the three "flinger" tests (Ocean, Text, Image) under Vellamo (free on the App Market) to see what your browser goes at for larger websites. I find that even pure stock runs fine for small mobile pages but if you try to load something like XDA Forums, it'll bog down amazingly.
its because i have nearly 200GB of music and i want it ALL on my device. I know some people find this strange but its how i like to do things
i want it all on there so I
1) don't have to change stuff in and out
2) don't have to stream it from something which kills the battery and is not available without a connection (airplane)
3) carry around a separate device
i would actually do #3 but no one makes a mp3 player with enough space
200GB of music is a lot more than you can listen to on one plane ride...
its because i have nearly 200GB of music and i want it ALL on my device. I know some people find this strange but its how i like to do things
i want it all on there so I
1) don't have to change stuff in and out
2) don't have to stream it from something which kills the battery and is not available without a connection (airplane)
3) carry around a separate device
i would actually do #3 but no one makes a mp3 player with enough space
thats not the point
i want the option to listen to any song in my lib at any time i want,
Not a world phone apparently, which is disappointing but not terribly breaking for me at least.
I agree. Plus current tech only gets you to like 80gb -- 200 would require multiple microSD slots or something.I don't see the need for that much local storage on a phone. I understand wanting it, but I don't think the majority of smartphone users out there would take full advantage of it, so the handset builders must not think it's worth doing if it means all phones get bulkier and/or more expensive.