The only complaint you can make is the fact that the rear camera is not flush with the black on the phone. Other than that, really good product aside from all the carrier and Samsung bloat.
I had always assumed Samsung did it b/c most folks are right handed, and if you're one-handing the phone, it's much more useful to be able to reach the back button than recent apps.
I do totally get that from a "flow" perspective, that the back button makes sense on the left. But it'd be impossible to reach one-handed.
If you're right handed, you should be holding the device with your left hand so you can operate it with your right. In that case, the back button should be oon the left so it can be reached with the left thumb.
If you're right handed, you should be holding the device with your left hand so you can operate it with your right. In that case, the back button should be oon the left so it can be reached with the left thumb.
If you're right handed, you should be holding the device with your left hand so you can operate it with your right. In that case, the back button should be oon the left so it can be reached with the left thumb.
Ok, Google works just fine for me, you just need to installed Google Text-to Speech instead of the Default samsung one.
Please, I have a note 4 and can still use it one handed. Having a gesture that shrinks down the screen do you can easily reach things on the top left was a stroke of brilliance.I never hold my phone in my left hand. Ever. That's for people with tiny girl hands or Note 4's.
That said I prefer the back button on the left.
Samsung Galaxy S5 has better battery life than S6, just saying
No it's not. Here's the evidence:
What's most impressive is that the Galaxy S6 is superior in both the Web Browsing and Video Playback battery life tests.
3G talk time is much less important.
So it looks like that, while having a slimmer battery, the Galaxy S6's 14nm processor is far more efficient than the 20nm junk found on the Galaxy S5 or iPhone 6 for that matter.
Ars Technica's more rigorous testing begs to differ:
In other words, that 20nm "junk" is doing much better on battery life. And for that matter, why are you attacking a manufacturing process that was cutting edge when devices like the iPhone 6 were new? You can't use technology that isn't ready yet.
Don't give in to the bait - I don't think anyone takes him seriously here.
Yes I know, I'm referring to touch-less control, which apparently only works with S-voice.
I haven't tried one out to see if it has it or not, but you do have some options. You can either install a 3rd party launcher that does the equivalent of touch-less control. Or, you could actually use S-voice to launch the Google app... and then use the Google app with your voice.
No it's not. Here's the evidence:
What's most impressive is that the Galaxy S6 is superior in both the Web Browsing and Video Playback battery life tests.
3G talk time is much less important.
So it looks like that, while having a slimmer battery, the Galaxy S6's 14nm processor is far more efficient than the 20nm junk found on the Galaxy S5 or iPhone 6 for that matter.
Ars Technica's more rigorous testing begs to differ:
In other words, that 20nm "junk" is doing much better on battery life. And for that matter, why are you attacking a manufacturing process that was cutting edge when devices like the iPhone 6 were new? You can't use technology that isn't ready yet.
Any more rumours about the S6 active? I've kinda lost interest in the S6 now that it is lacking in the two things that I really wanted out of it.
This is evidence that the Galaxy S6's fast charging capabilities are superior to whatever capabilities that the iPhone 6 has.
And that's data without a 2.1 mAh charger for the iP6.
I'm out...