Amd and Intel needs to up their game.
Samsungs big fat monster R&D budget is starting to materialize.
Euv and 6 issue design...
2x faster @ 2.9GHz and 40% faster for multicore against 2.34GHz predecessor suggests:
-60% faster per clock
-2GHz multi core clock
I think ARM vendors including Apple are getting nice benefits from the "big.little approach". The idea starts to make sense when the advancements start being process limited. Before, you'd increase execution units to improve per core performance with little care for anything else - new process will take care of the transistor count and power consumption increase.
But its been few years where process improvements have slowed. And the CPUs are thermally limited. Hence all architects go with the 1% increase in power for 1% increase in performance approach, for example.
Traditionally, its said that per core performance increases at square root of core size(thus power use). 4x core size would end up in 2x the performance. If you are then process, thus power limited, that works against you. Rather than a 4x sized core being 2x faster, it needs to throttle and may not end up being faster. Also it means eventually your "little" cores aren't so little in terms of performance compared to your "big" cores.
With approaches like what ARM calls it DynamIQ(enhanced big.little basically), you can do fancy things with it. The "little" cores can be used to speed up multi-thread execution, as multiple cores scale near linearly in many applications. The "big" cores can be way bigger than before for Single thread, since smaller, and more power efficient cores can be used for everything else.
ARM's DynamIQ:
https://www.anandtech.com/show/11441/dynamiq-and-arms-new-cpus-cortex-a75-a55/2
Unfortunately for Intel and AMD they seem to be beset with serious execution issues and their implementation of such an idea is delayed. For Intel, their CTO Justin Rattner in 2008 talked about "Platform 2015", a vision that is being fulfilled today.
Around 2015-2016 we would have seen 10nm Intel architectures, had they not had issues with their process. I believe Intel's version, code-named Lake Field, will be achieved early as Ice Lake generation.